[PATCH 0/4] slub: refactoring some code in slub

[PATCH 0/4] slub: refactoring some code in slub

[Joonsoo Kim]

These patches are for refactoring some code in slub.

Two patches were submitted 1 weeks ago, but doesn't receive ack or nack
from MAINTAINER for slub. So I re-send these.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/10/273
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/10/275

Among others, one about page-flag is very simple change.
Last one is main target of this patch set.

It is dependent on 'slub: change cmpxchg_double_slab in 
unfreeze_partials to __cmpxchg_double_slab', so I send these at one time.

Joonsoo Kim (4):
  slub: change cmpxchg_double_slab in get_freelist() to
    __cmpxchg_double_slab
  slub: change cmpxchg_double_slab in unfreeze_partials to
    __cmpxchg_double_slab
  slub: use __SetPageSlab function to set PG_slab flag
  slub: refactoring unfreeze_partials()

 mm/slub.c |   54 +++++++++++++++++-------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

[PATCH 1/4] slub: change cmpxchg_double_slab in get_freelist() to __cmpxchg_double_slab

[Joonsoo Kim]

get_freelist() is only called by __slab_alloc with interrupt disabled,
so __cmpxchg_double_slab is suitable.

Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 0c3105c..d28bc45 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2179,7 +2179,7 @@ static inline void *get_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page)
 		new.inuse = page->objects;
 		new.frozen = freelist != NULL;
 
-	} while (!cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
+	} while (!__cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
 		freelist, counters,
 		NULL, new.counters,
 		"get_freelist"));
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

[PATCH 2/4] slub: change cmpxchg_double_slab in unfreeze_partials to __cmpxchg_double_slab

[Joonsoo Kim]

unfreeze_partials() is only called with interrupt disabled,
so __cmpxchg_double_slab is suitable.

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index d28bc45..c38efce 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1935,7 +1935,7 @@ static void unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s)
 				l = m;
 			}
 
-		} while (!cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
+		} while (!__cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
 				old.freelist, old.counters,
 				new.freelist, new.counters,
 				"unfreezing slab"));
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

[PATCH 3/4] slub: use __SetPageSlab function to set PG_slab flag

[Joonsoo Kim]

To set page-flag, using SetPageXXXX() and __SetPageXXXX() is more
understandable and maintainable. So change it.

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index c38efce..69342fd 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ static struct page *new_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
 
 	inc_slabs_node(s, page_to_nid(page), page->objects);
 	page->slab = s;
-	page->flags |= 1 << PG_slab;
+	__SetPageSlab(page);
 
 	start = page_address(page);
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 3/4] slub: use __SetPageSlab function to set PG_slab flag

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 18 May 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:

> To set page-flag, using SetPageXXXX() and __SetPageXXXX() is more
> understandable and maintainable. So change it.

Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 3/4] slub: use __SetPageSlab function to set PG_slab flag

[Pekka Enberg]

On Fri, 18 May 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:

> To set page-flag, using SetPageXXXX() and __SetPageXXXX() is more
> understandable and maintainable. So change it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
> 
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index c38efce..69342fd 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ static struct page *new_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
>  
>  	inc_slabs_node(s, page_to_nid(page), page->objects);
>  	page->slab = s;
> -	page->flags |= 1 << PG_slab;
> +	__SetPageSlab(page);
>  
>  	start = page_address(page);

Applied

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

[PATCH 4/4] slub: refactoring unfreeze_partials()

[Joonsoo Kim]

Current implementation of unfreeze_partials() is so complicated,
but benefit from it is insignificant. In addition many code in
do {} while loop have a bad influence to a fail rate of cmpxchg_double_slab.
Under current implementation which test status of cpu partial slab
and acquire list_lock in do {} while loop,
we don't need to acquire a list_lock and gain a little benefit
when front of the cpu partial slab is to be discarded, but this is a rare case.
In case that add_partial is performed and cmpxchg_double_slab is failed,
remove_partial should be called case by case.

I think that these are disadvantages of current implementation,
so I do refactoring unfreeze_partials().

Minimizing code in do {} while loop introduce a reduced fail rate
of cmpxchg_double_slab. Below is output of 'slabinfo -r kmalloc-256'
when './perf stat -r 33 hackbench 50 process 4000 > /dev/null' is done.

** before **
Cmpxchg_double Looping
------------------------
Locked Cmpxchg Double redos   182685
Unlocked Cmpxchg Double redos 0

** after **
Cmpxchg_double Looping
------------------------
Locked Cmpxchg Double redos   177995
Unlocked Cmpxchg Double redos 1

We can see cmpxchg_double_slab fail rate is improved slightly.

Bolow is output of './perf stat -r 30 hackbench 50 process 4000 > /dev/null'.

** before **
 Performance counter stats for './hackbench 50 process 4000' (30 runs):

     108517.190463 task-clock                #    7.926 CPUs utilized            ( +-  0.24% )
         2,919,550 context-switches          #    0.027 M/sec                    ( +-  3.07% )
           100,774 CPU-migrations            #    0.929 K/sec                    ( +-  4.72% )
           124,201 page-faults               #    0.001 M/sec                    ( +-  0.15% )
   401,500,234,387 cycles                    #    3.700 GHz                      ( +-  0.24% )
   <not supported> stalled-cycles-frontend
   <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
   250,576,913,354 instructions              #    0.62  insns per cycle          ( +-  0.13% )
    45,934,956,860 branches                  #  423.297 M/sec                    ( +-  0.14% )
       188,219,787 branch-misses             #    0.41% of all branches          ( +-  0.56% )

      13.691837307 seconds time elapsed                                          ( +-  0.24% )

** after **
 Performance counter stats for './hackbench 50 process 4000' (30 runs):

     107784.479767 task-clock                #    7.928 CPUs utilized            ( +-  0.22% )
         2,834,781 context-switches          #    0.026 M/sec                    ( +-  2.33% )
            93,083 CPU-migrations            #    0.864 K/sec                    ( +-  3.45% )
           123,967 page-faults               #    0.001 M/sec                    ( +-  0.15% )
   398,781,421,836 cycles                    #    3.700 GHz                      ( +-  0.22% )
   <not supported> stalled-cycles-frontend
   <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
   250,189,160,419 instructions              #    0.63  insns per cycle          ( +-  0.09% )
    45,855,370,128 branches                  #  425.436 M/sec                    ( +-  0.10% )
       169,881,248 branch-misses             #    0.37% of all branches          ( +-  0.43% )

      13.596272341 seconds time elapsed                                          ( +-  0.22% )

No regression is found, but rather we can see slightly better result.

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 69342fd..eebb6d0 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1882,18 +1882,24 @@ redo:
 /* Unfreeze all the cpu partial slabs */
 static void unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s)
 {
-	struct kmem_cache_node *n = NULL;
+	struct kmem_cache_node *n = NULL, *n2 = NULL;
 	struct kmem_cache_cpu *c = this_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
 	struct page *page, *discard_page = NULL;
 
 	while ((page = c->partial)) {
-		enum slab_modes { M_PARTIAL, M_FREE };
-		enum slab_modes l, m;
 		struct page new;
 		struct page old;
 
 		c->partial = page->next;
-		l = M_FREE;
+
+		n2 = get_node(s, page_to_nid(page));
+		if (n != n2) {
+			if (n)
+				spin_unlock(&n->list_lock);
+
+			n = n2;
+			spin_lock(&n->list_lock);
+		}
 
 		do {
 
@@ -1906,43 +1912,17 @@ static void unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s)
 
 			new.frozen = 0;
 
-			if (!new.inuse && (!n || n->nr_partial > s->min_partial))
-				m = M_FREE;
-			else {
-				struct kmem_cache_node *n2 = get_node(s,
-							page_to_nid(page));
-
-				m = M_PARTIAL;
-				if (n != n2) {
-					if (n)
-						spin_unlock(&n->list_lock);
-
-					n = n2;
-					spin_lock(&n->list_lock);
-				}
-			}
-
-			if (l != m) {
-				if (l == M_PARTIAL) {
-					remove_partial(n, page);
-					stat(s, FREE_REMOVE_PARTIAL);
-				} else {
-					add_partial(n, page,
-						DEACTIVATE_TO_TAIL);
-					stat(s, FREE_ADD_PARTIAL);
-				}
-
-				l = m;
-			}
-
 		} while (!__cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
 				old.freelist, old.counters,
 				new.freelist, new.counters,
 				"unfreezing slab"));
 
-		if (m == M_FREE) {
+		if (unlikely(!new.inuse && n->nr_partial > s->min_partial)) {
 			page->next = discard_page;
 			discard_page = page;
+		} else {
+			add_partial(n, page, DEACTIVATE_TO_TAIL);
+			stat(s, FREE_ADD_PARTIAL);
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 4/4] slub: refactoring unfreeze_partials()

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 18 May 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:

> I think that these are disadvantages of current implementation,
> so I do refactoring unfreeze_partials().

The reason the current implementation is so complex is to avoid races. The
state of the list and the state of the partial pages must be consistent at
all times.

> Minimizing code in do {} while loop introduce a reduced fail rate
> of cmpxchg_double_slab. Below is output of 'slabinfo -r kmalloc-256'
> when './perf stat -r 33 hackbench 50 process 4000 > /dev/null' is done.

Looks good. If I can convince myself that this does not open up any
new races then I may ack it.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 4/4] slub: refactoring unfreeze_partials()

[JoonSoo Kim]

2012/5/18 Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>:
> The reason the current implementation is so complex is to avoid races. The
> state of the list and the state of the partial pages must be consistent at
> all times.
OK. I got it.

> Looks good. If I can convince myself that this does not open up any
> new races then I may ack it.
Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 4/4] slub: refactoring unfreeze_partials()

[Joonsoo Kim]

On Thu, 17 May 2012, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> On Fri, 18 May 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
>> I think that these are disadvantages of current implementation,
>> so I do refactoring unfreeze_partials().
>
> The reason the current implementation is so complex is to avoid races. The
> state of the list and the state of the partial pages must be consistent at
> all times.
>
>> Minimizing code in do {} while loop introduce a reduced fail rate
>> of cmpxchg_double_slab. Below is output of 'slabinfo -r kmalloc-256'
>> when './perf stat -r 33 hackbench 50 process 4000 > /dev/null' is done.
>
> Looks good. If I can convince myself that this does not open up any
> new races then I may ack it.

This is a reminder mail.
Would u give me some comments for this please?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 4/4] slub: refactoring unfreeze_partials()

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 18 May 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:

> Minimizing code in do {} while loop introduce a reduced fail rate
> of cmpxchg_double_slab. Below is output of 'slabinfo -r kmalloc-256'
> when './perf stat -r 33 hackbench 50 process 4000 > /dev/null' is done.

Ok. This works because the pages are frozen and the node lock has been
taken so the only concurrency to worry about is freeing of objects via
slab_free(). The cmpxchg is safe for that.

Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 0/4] slub: refactoring some code in slub

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 18 May 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:

> Two patches were submitted 1 weeks ago, but doesn't receive ack or nack
> from MAINTAINER for slub. So I re-send these.

Could you combine the first two patches into one? They do the same thing.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 0/4] slub: refactoring some code in slub

[JoonSoo Kim]

2012/5/18 Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>:
> On Fri, 18 May 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
>> Two patches were submitted 1 weeks ago, but doesn't receive ack or nack
>> from MAINTAINER for slub. So I re-send these.
>
> Could you combine the first two patches into one? They do the same thing.
>

Of course. I will re-send combined patch soon.
Thank you.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

[PATCH 1,2/4 v2] slub: use __cmpxchg_double_slab() at interrupt disabled place

[Joonsoo Kim]

get_freelist() is only called by __slab_alloc() with interrupt disabled,
so __cmpxchg_double_slab() is suitable.

unfreeze_partials() is only called with interrupt disabled,
so __cmpxchg_double_slab() is suitable.

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 0c3105c..c38efce 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1935,7 +1935,7 @@ static void unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s)
 				l = m;
 			}
 
-		} while (!cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
+		} while (!__cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
 				old.freelist, old.counters,
 				new.freelist, new.counters,
 				"unfreezing slab"));
@@ -2179,7 +2179,7 @@ static inline void *get_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page)
 		new.inuse = page->objects;
 		new.frozen = freelist != NULL;
 
-	} while (!cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
+	} while (!__cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
 		freelist, counters,
 		NULL, new.counters,
 		"get_freelist"));
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 1,2/4 v2] slub: use __cmpxchg_double_slab() at interrupt disabled place

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 18 May 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:

> get_freelist() is only called by __slab_alloc() with interrupt disabled,
> so __cmpxchg_double_slab() is suitable.
>
> unfreeze_partials() is only called with interrupt disabled,
> so __cmpxchg_double_slab() is suitable.

Combine these sentences as well.

Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

[PATCH 1,2/4 v3] slub: use __cmpxchg_double_slab() at interrupt disabled place

[Joonsoo Kim]

get_freelist(), unfreeze_partials() are only called with interrupt disabled,
so __cmpxchg_double_slab() is suitable.

Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 0c3105c..c38efce 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1935,7 +1935,7 @@ static void unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s)
 				l = m;
 			}
 
-		} while (!cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
+		} while (!__cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
 				old.freelist, old.counters,
 				new.freelist, new.counters,
 				"unfreezing slab"));
@@ -2179,7 +2179,7 @@ static inline void *get_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page)
 		new.inuse = page->objects;
 		new.frozen = freelist != NULL;
 
-	} while (!cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
+	} while (!__cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
 		freelist, counters,
 		NULL, new.counters,
 		"get_freelist"));
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 1,2/4 v2] slub: use __cmpxchg_double_slab() at interrupt disabled place

[Pekka Enberg]

On Thu, 17 May 2012, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> On Fri, 18 May 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> 
> > get_freelist() is only called by __slab_alloc() with interrupt disabled,
> > so __cmpxchg_double_slab() is suitable.
> >
> > unfreeze_partials() is only called with interrupt disabled,
> > so __cmpxchg_double_slab() is suitable.
> 
> Combine these sentences as well.
> 
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>

You should add a comment on top of get_freelist() and unfreeze_partials() 
that they now *require* interrupts to be disabled.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

[PATCH 1,2/4 v4] slub: use __cmpxchg_double_slab() at interrupt disabled place

[Joonsoo Kim]

get_freelist(), unfreeze_partials() are only called with interrupt disabled,
so __cmpxchg_double_slab() is suitable.

Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
---
According to comment from Pekka, add some comment.

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 0c3105c..d7f8291 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1879,7 +1879,11 @@ redo:
 	}
 }
 
-/* Unfreeze all the cpu partial slabs */
+/*
+ * Unfreeze all the cpu partial slabs.
+ *
+ * This function must be called with interrupt disabled.
+ */
 static void unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s)
 {
 	struct kmem_cache_node *n = NULL;
@@ -1935,7 +1939,7 @@ static void unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s)
 				l = m;
 			}
 
-		} while (!cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
+		} while (!__cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
 				old.freelist, old.counters,
 				new.freelist, new.counters,
 				"unfreezing slab"));
@@ -2163,6 +2167,8 @@ static inline void *new_slab_objects(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags,
  * The page is still frozen if the return value is not NULL.
  *
  * If this function returns NULL then the page has been unfrozen.
+ *
+ * This function must be called with interrupt disabled.
  */
 static inline void *get_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page)
 {
@@ -2179,7 +2185,7 @@ static inline void *get_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page)
 		new.inuse = page->objects;
 		new.frozen = freelist != NULL;
 
-	} while (!cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
+	} while (!__cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
 		freelist, counters,
 		NULL, new.counters,
 		"get_freelist"));
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 1,2/4 v4] slub: use __cmpxchg_double_slab() at interrupt disabled place

[Pekka Enberg]

On Fri, 18 May 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:

> get_freelist(), unfreeze_partials() are only called with interrupt disabled,
> so __cmpxchg_double_slab() is suitable.
> 
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>

Applied, thanks!

> ---
> According to comment from Pekka, add some comment.
> 
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 0c3105c..d7f8291 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1879,7 +1879,11 @@ redo:
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -/* Unfreeze all the cpu partial slabs */
> +/*
> + * Unfreeze all the cpu partial slabs.
> + *
> + * This function must be called with interrupt disabled.
> + */
>  static void unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s)
>  {
>  	struct kmem_cache_node *n = NULL;
> @@ -1935,7 +1939,7 @@ static void unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s)
>  				l = m;
>  			}
>  
> -		} while (!cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
> +		} while (!__cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
>  				old.freelist, old.counters,
>  				new.freelist, new.counters,
>  				"unfreezing slab"));
> @@ -2163,6 +2167,8 @@ static inline void *new_slab_objects(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags,
>   * The page is still frozen if the return value is not NULL.
>   *
>   * If this function returns NULL then the page has been unfrozen.
> + *
> + * This function must be called with interrupt disabled.
>   */
>  static inline void *get_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page)
>  {
> @@ -2179,7 +2185,7 @@ static inline void *get_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page)
>  		new.inuse = page->objects;
>  		new.frozen = freelist != NULL;
>  
> -	} while (!cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
> +	} while (!__cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
>  		freelist, counters,
>  		NULL, new.counters,
>  		"get_freelist"));
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>