linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH V5 3/5] mm: memcg detect no memcgs above softlimit under zone reclaim
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:47:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340038051-29502-3-git-send-email-yinghan@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340038051-29502-1-git-send-email-yinghan@google.com>

In memcg kernel, cgroup under its softlimit is not targeted under global
reclaim. It could be possible that all memcgs are under their softlimit for
a particular zone. If that is the case, the current implementation will
burn extra cpu cycles without making forward progress.

The idea is from LSF discussion where we detect it after the first round of
scanning and restart the reclaim by not looking at softlimit at all. This
allows us to make forward progress on shrink_zone().

Signed-off-by: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c |   17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 8c367e1..51f8cc9 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1827,6 +1827,10 @@ static void shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
 		.priority = sc->priority,
 	};
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
+	bool over_softlimit, ignore_softlimit = false;
+
+restart:
+	over_softlimit = false;
 
 	memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, NULL, &reclaim);
 	do {
@@ -1845,10 +1849,14 @@ static void shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
 		 * we have to reclaim under softlimit instead of burning more
 		 * cpu cycles.
 		 */
-		if (!global_reclaim(sc) || sc->priority < DEF_PRIORITY - 2 ||
-				should_reclaim_mem_cgroup(memcg))
+		if (ignore_softlimit || !global_reclaim(sc) ||
+				sc->priority < DEF_PRIORITY - 2 ||
+				should_reclaim_mem_cgroup(memcg)) {
 			shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
 
+			over_softlimit = true;
+		}
+
 		/*
 		 * Limit reclaim has historically picked one memcg and
 		 * scanned it with decreasing priority levels until
@@ -1865,6 +1873,11 @@ static void shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
 		}
 		memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, memcg, &reclaim);
 	} while (memcg);
+
+	if (!over_softlimit) {
+		ignore_softlimit = true;
+		goto restart;
+	}
 }
 
 /* Returns true if compaction should go ahead for a high-order request */
-- 
1.7.7.3

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-18 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-18 16:47 [PATCH V5 1/5] mm: memcg softlimit reclaim rework Ying Han
2012-06-18 16:47 ` [PATCH V2 2/5] mm: memcg set soft_limit_in_bytes to 0 by default Ying Han
2012-06-18 16:47 ` Ying Han [this message]
2012-06-18 16:47 ` [PATCH V5 4/5] mm, vmscan: fix do_try_to_free_pages() livelock Ying Han
2012-06-19 18:29   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-20  3:29     ` Ying Han
2012-06-18 16:47 ` [PATCH V5 5/5] mm: memcg discount pages under softlimit from per-zone reclaimable_pages Ying Han
2012-06-19 12:05   ` Johannes Weiner
2012-06-20  3:51     ` Ying Han
2012-06-25 21:00     ` Ying Han
2012-06-19 11:29 ` [PATCH V5 1/5] mm: memcg softlimit reclaim rework Johannes Weiner
2012-06-20  3:45   ` Ying Han
2012-06-20  8:53     ` Johannes Weiner
2012-06-20 14:59       ` Ying Han

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1340038051-29502-3-git-send-email-yinghan@google.com \
    --to=yinghan@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
    --cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).