linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.cz,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	htejun@gmail.com, lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cgroup: Don't drop the cgroup_mutex in cgroup_rmdir
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 19:39:32 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1342706972-10912-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ipdjc15j.fsf@skywalker.in.ibm.com>

From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

We dropped cgroup mutex, because of a deadlock between memcg and cpuset.
cpuset took hotplug lock followed by cgroup_mutex, where as memcg pre_destroy
did lru_add_drain_all() which took hotplug lock while already holding
cgroup_mutex. The deadlock is explained in 3fa59dfbc3b223f02c26593be69ce6fc9a940405
But dropping cgroup_mutex in cgroup_rmdir also means tasks could get
added to cgroup while we are in pre_destroy. This makes error handling in
pre_destroy complex. So move the unlock/lock to memcg pre_destroy callback.
Core cgroup will now call pre_destroy with cgroup_mutex held.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/cgroup.c |    3 +--
 mm/memcontrol.c |   11 ++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 7981850..01c67f4 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -4151,7 +4151,6 @@ again:
 		mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
 		return -EBUSY;
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
 
 	/*
 	 * In general, subsystem has no css->refcnt after pre_destroy(). But
@@ -4171,10 +4170,10 @@ again:
 	ret = cgroup_call_pre_destroy(cgrp);
 	if (ret) {
 		clear_bit(CGRP_WAIT_ON_RMDIR, &cgrp->flags);
+		mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
 	parent = cgrp->parent;
 	if (atomic_read(&cgrp->count) || !list_empty(&cgrp->children)) {
 		clear_bit(CGRP_WAIT_ON_RMDIR, &cgrp->flags);
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index e8ddc00..9bd56ee 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -4993,9 +4993,18 @@ free_out:
 
 static int mem_cgroup_pre_destroy(struct cgroup *cont)
 {
+	int ret;
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
 
-	return mem_cgroup_force_empty(memcg, false);
+	cgroup_unlock();
+	/*
+	 * we call lru_add_drain_all, which end up taking
+	 * mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock), But cpuset have
+	 * the reverse order. So drop the cgroup lock
+	 */
+	ret = mem_cgroup_force_empty(memcg, false);
+	cgroup_lock();
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static void mem_cgroup_destroy(struct cgroup *cont)
-- 
1.7.10

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-19 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20120718212637.133475C0050@hpza9.eem.corp.google.com>
2012-07-19 11:39 ` + hugetlb-cgroup-simplify-pre_destroy-callback.patch added to -mm tree Michal Hocko
2012-07-19 12:21   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-07-19 12:38     ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-19 13:48       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-07-19 14:09         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2012-07-19 16:50           ` [PATCH] cgroup: Don't drop the cgroup_mutex in cgroup_rmdir Tejun Heo
2012-07-20 15:45             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-20 20:05               ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-20 22:07                 ` Glauber Costa
2012-07-27  6:15                 ` Li Zefan
2012-07-30 18:25                   ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-20  7:51           ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-20 19:49           ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-20  1:05         ` + hugetlb-cgroup-simplify-pre_destroy-callback.patch added to -mm tree Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-07-20  1:20           ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-07-20  8:01             ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-20  8:08               ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-07-20  8:06         ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-20 19:18           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-07-20 19:56             ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-21  2:14               ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-07-21  2:46                 ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-21  4:05                   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-07-22 17:34                     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1342706972-10912-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).