From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: riel@redhat.com, daniel.santos@pobox.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
dwmw2@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] rbtree: faster augmented insert
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 21:26:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1343417168.32120.38.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1342787467-5493-5-git-send-email-walken@google.com>
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 05:31 -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> --- a/lib/rbtree.c
> +++ b/lib/rbtree.c
> @@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ __rb_rotate_set_parents(struct rb_node *old, struct rb_node *new,
> root->rb_node = new;
> }
>
> -void rb_insert_color(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root)
> +inline void rb_insert_augmented(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root,
> + rb_augment_rotate *augment)
Daniel probably knows best, but I would have expected something like:
__always_inline void
__rb_insert(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root,
const rb_augment_rotate *augment)
Where you force inline and use a const function pointer since GCC is
better with inlining them -- iirc, Daniel?
> {
> struct rb_node *parent = rb_red_parent(node), *gparent, *tmp;
>
> @@ -152,6 +153,7 @@ void rb_insert_color(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root)
> rb_set_parent_color(tmp, parent,
> RB_BLACK);
> rb_set_parent_color(parent, node, RB_RED);
> + augment(parent, node);
And possibly:
if (augment)
augment(parent, node);
> parent = node;
> tmp = node->rb_right;
> }
> +static inline void dummy(struct rb_node *old, struct rb_node *new) {}
That would obviate the need for the dummy..
> +void rb_insert_color(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root) {
placed your { wrong..
> + rb_insert_augmented(node, root, dummy);
> +}
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rb_insert_color);
And use Daniel's __flatten here, like:
void rb_insert_color(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root)
__flatten
{
__rb_insert(node, root, NULL);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rb_insert_color);
void rb_insert_augmented(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root,
const rb_augment_rotate *augment) __flatten
{
__rb_insert(node, root, augment);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rb_insert_augmented);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-27 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-20 12:31 [RFC PATCH 0/6] augmented rbtree changes Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-20 12:31 ` [PATCH 1/6] rbtree: rb_erase updates and comments Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-24 18:50 ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-20 12:31 ` [PATCH 2/6] rbtree: optimize fetching of sibling node Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-24 21:52 ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-20 12:31 ` [PATCH 3/6] augmented rbtree test Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-25 15:42 ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-20 12:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] rbtree: faster augmented insert Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-25 16:10 ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-25 17:54 ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-27 19:26 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-07-27 21:43 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-27 19:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-27 20:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-27 21:55 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-20 12:31 ` [PATCH 5/6] rbtree: faster augmented erase Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-24 1:54 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-25 17:53 ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-27 19:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-27 20:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-28 0:44 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-28 2:31 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-20 12:31 ` [PATCH 6/6] rbtree: remove prior augmented rbtree implementation Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-24 1:55 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-25 17:59 ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-24 1:46 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] augmented rbtree changes Michel Lespinasse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1343417168.32120.38.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel.santos@pobox.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).