linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: riel@redhat.com, daniel.santos@pobox.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
	dwmw2@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] rbtree: faster augmented insert
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 21:26:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1343417168.32120.38.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1342787467-5493-5-git-send-email-walken@google.com>

On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 05:31 -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> --- a/lib/rbtree.c
> +++ b/lib/rbtree.c
> @@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ __rb_rotate_set_parents(struct rb_node *old, struct rb_node *new,
>                 root->rb_node = new;
>  }
>  
> -void rb_insert_color(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root)
> +inline void rb_insert_augmented(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root,
> +                               rb_augment_rotate *augment)

Daniel probably knows best, but I would have expected something like:

__always_inline void 
__rb_insert(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root,
	    const rb_augment_rotate *augment)

Where you force inline and use a const function pointer since GCC is
better with inlining them -- iirc, Daniel?

>  {
>         struct rb_node *parent = rb_red_parent(node), *gparent, *tmp;
>  
> @@ -152,6 +153,7 @@ void rb_insert_color(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root)
>                                         rb_set_parent_color(tmp, parent,
>                                                             RB_BLACK);
>                                 rb_set_parent_color(parent, node, RB_RED);
> +                               augment(parent, node);

And possibly:
		if (augment)
			augment(parent, node);

>                                 parent = node;
>                                 tmp = node->rb_right;
>                         }


> +static inline void dummy(struct rb_node *old, struct rb_node *new) {}

That would obviate the need for the dummy..

> +void rb_insert_color(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root) {

placed your { wrong..

> +       rb_insert_augmented(node, root, dummy);
> +}
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(rb_insert_color); 

And use Daniel's __flatten here, like:

void rb_insert_color(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root)
__flatten
{
	__rb_insert(node, root, NULL);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rb_insert_color);

void rb_insert_augmented(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root,
			 const rb_augment_rotate *augment) __flatten
{
	__rb_insert(node, root, augment);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rb_insert_augmented);

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-27 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-20 12:31 [RFC PATCH 0/6] augmented rbtree changes Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-20 12:31 ` [PATCH 1/6] rbtree: rb_erase updates and comments Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-24 18:50   ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-20 12:31 ` [PATCH 2/6] rbtree: optimize fetching of sibling node Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-24 21:52   ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-20 12:31 ` [PATCH 3/6] augmented rbtree test Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-25 15:42   ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-20 12:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] rbtree: faster augmented insert Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-25 16:10   ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-25 17:54   ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-27 19:26   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-07-27 21:43     ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-27 19:31   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-27 20:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-27 21:55     ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-20 12:31 ` [PATCH 5/6] rbtree: faster augmented erase Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-24  1:54   ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-25 17:53     ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-27 19:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-27 20:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-28  0:44     ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-28  2:31       ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-20 12:31 ` [PATCH 6/6] rbtree: remove prior augmented rbtree implementation Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-24  1:55   ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-07-25 17:59     ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-24  1:46 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] augmented rbtree changes Michel Lespinasse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1343417168.32120.38.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=daniel.santos@pobox.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).