From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, davem@davemloft.net,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@elte.hu, ebiederm@xmission.com,
aarcange@redhat.com, ericvh@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
josh@joshtriplett.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC v3 3/7] mm,ksm: use new hashtable implementation
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 02:45:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1344300317-23189-4-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344300317-23189-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Switch ksm to use the new hashtable implementation. This reduces the amount of
generic unrelated code in the ksm module.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
---
mm/ksm.c | 31 +++++++++++++------------------
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index 47c8853..96d5f91 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
#include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
#include <linux/swap.h>
#include <linux/ksm.h>
-#include <linux/hash.h>
+#include <linux/hashtable.h>
#include <linux/freezer.h>
#include <linux/oom.h>
@@ -156,9 +156,8 @@ struct rmap_item {
static struct rb_root root_stable_tree = RB_ROOT;
static struct rb_root root_unstable_tree = RB_ROOT;
-#define MM_SLOTS_HASH_SHIFT 10
-#define MM_SLOTS_HASH_HEADS (1 << MM_SLOTS_HASH_SHIFT)
-static struct hlist_head mm_slots_hash[MM_SLOTS_HASH_HEADS];
+#define MM_SLOTS_HASH_BITS 10
+static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(mm_slots_hash, MM_SLOTS_HASH_BITS);
static struct mm_slot ksm_mm_head = {
.mm_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(ksm_mm_head.mm_list),
@@ -275,26 +274,22 @@ static inline void free_mm_slot(struct mm_slot *mm_slot)
static struct mm_slot *get_mm_slot(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
- struct mm_slot *mm_slot;
- struct hlist_head *bucket;
struct hlist_node *node;
+ struct mm_slot *slot;
+
+ hash_for_each_possible(mm_slots_hash, slot, MM_SLOTS_HASH_BITS,
+ node, link, (unsigned long)mm)
+ if (slot->mm == mm)
+ return slot;
- bucket = &mm_slots_hash[hash_ptr(mm, MM_SLOTS_HASH_SHIFT)];
- hlist_for_each_entry(mm_slot, node, bucket, link) {
- if (mm == mm_slot->mm)
- return mm_slot;
- }
return NULL;
}
static void insert_to_mm_slots_hash(struct mm_struct *mm,
struct mm_slot *mm_slot)
{
- struct hlist_head *bucket;
-
- bucket = &mm_slots_hash[hash_ptr(mm, MM_SLOTS_HASH_SHIFT)];
mm_slot->mm = mm;
- hlist_add_head(&mm_slot->link, bucket);
+ hash_add(mm_slots_hash, MM_SLOTS_HASH_BITS, &mm_slot->link, (long)mm);
}
static inline int in_stable_tree(struct rmap_item *rmap_item)
@@ -647,7 +642,7 @@ static int unmerge_and_remove_all_rmap_items(void)
ksm_scan.mm_slot = list_entry(mm_slot->mm_list.next,
struct mm_slot, mm_list);
if (ksm_test_exit(mm)) {
- hlist_del(&mm_slot->link);
+ hash_del(&mm_slot->link);
list_del(&mm_slot->mm_list);
spin_unlock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
@@ -1385,7 +1380,7 @@ next_mm:
* or when all VM_MERGEABLE areas have been unmapped (and
* mmap_sem then protects against race with MADV_MERGEABLE).
*/
- hlist_del(&slot->link);
+ hash_del(&slot->link);
list_del(&slot->mm_list);
spin_unlock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
@@ -1548,7 +1543,7 @@ void __ksm_exit(struct mm_struct *mm)
mm_slot = get_mm_slot(mm);
if (mm_slot && ksm_scan.mm_slot != mm_slot) {
if (!mm_slot->rmap_list) {
- hlist_del(&mm_slot->link);
+ hash_del(&mm_slot->link);
list_del(&mm_slot->mm_list);
easy_to_free = 1;
} else {
--
1.7.8.6
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-07 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-07 0:45 [RFC v3 0/7] generic hashtable implementation Sasha Levin
2012-08-07 0:45 ` [RFC v3 1/7] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable Sasha Levin
2012-08-07 1:19 ` Joe Perches
2012-08-07 1:48 ` Li Wei
2012-08-07 1:54 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-07 2:55 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-07 9:49 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-07 0:45 ` [RFC v3 2/7] user_ns: use new hashtable implementation Sasha Levin
2012-08-07 0:45 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2012-08-07 0:45 ` [RFC v3 4/7] workqueue: " Sasha Levin
2012-08-07 0:45 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-07 1:19 ` Joe Perches
2012-08-07 0:45 ` [RFC v3 5/7] mm/huge_memory: " Sasha Levin
2012-08-07 0:45 ` [RFC v3 6/7] tracepoint: " Sasha Levin
2012-08-07 0:45 ` [RFC v3 7/7] net,9p: " Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1344300317-23189-4-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--to=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).