From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Improve hugepage allocation success rates under load V2
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 20:08:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1344452924-24438-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> (raw)
Changelog since V1
o Dropped kswapd related patch, basically a no-op and regresses if fixed (minchan)
o Expanded changelogs a little
Allocation success rates have been far lower since 3.4 due to commit
[fe2c2a10: vmscan: reclaim at order 0 when compaction is enabled]. This
commit was introduced for good reasons and it was known in advance that
the success rates would suffer but it was justified on the grounds that
the high allocation success rates were achieved by aggressive reclaim.
Success rates are expected to suffer even more in 3.6 due to commit
[7db8889a: mm: have order > 0 compaction start off where it left] which
testing has shown to severely reduce allocation success rates under load -
to 0% in one case. There is a proposed change to that patch in this series
and it would be ideal if Jim Schutt could retest the workload that led to
commit [7db8889a: mm: have order > 0 compaction start off where it left].
This series aims to improve the allocation success rates without regressing
the benefits of commit fe2c2a10. The series is based on 3.5 and includes
the commit 7db8889a to illustrate what impact it has to success rates.
Patch 1 updates a stale comment seeing as I was in the general area.
Patch 2 updates reclaim/compaction to reclaim pages scaled on the number
of recent failures.
Patch 3 captures suitable high-order pages freed by compaction to reduce
races with parallel allocation requests.
Patch 4 is an upstream commit that has compaction restart free page scanning
from an old position instead of always starting from the end of the
zone
Patch 5 adjusts patch 5 to restores allocation success rates.
STRESS-HIGHALLOC
3.5.0-vanilla patches:1-2 patches:1-3 patches:1-5
Pass 1 36.00 ( 0.00%) 61.00 (25.00%) 62.00 (26.00%) 56.00 (20.00%)
Pass 2 46.00 ( 0.00%) 61.00 (15.00%) 60.00 (14.00%) 56.00 (10.00%)
while Rested 84.00 ( 0.00%) 85.00 ( 1.00%) 86.00 ( 2.00%) 85.00 ( 1.00%)
>From
http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/mmtests-20120424/global-dhp__stress-highalloc-performance-ext3/hydra/comparison.html
I know that the allocation success rates in 3.3.6 was 78% in comparison
to 36% in 3.5. With the full series applied, the success rates are up to
around 60% with some variability in the results. This is not as high
a success rate but it does not reclaim excessively which is a key point.
Previous tests on V1 of this series showed that patch 4 on its own adversely
affected high-order allocation success rates.
MMTests Statistics: vmstat
Page Ins 3037580 3167260 3121588 2939576
Page Outs 8026888 8028472 8026444 8033852
Swap Ins 0 0 0 0
Swap Outs 0 0 0 0
Note that swap in/out rates remain at 0. In 3.3.6 with 78% success rates
there were 71881 pages swapped out.
Direct pages scanned 97106 59600 118792 84142
Kswapd pages scanned 1231288 1419472 1406569 1406642
Kswapd pages reclaimed 1231221 1419248 1390694 1357820
Direct pages reclaimed 97100 59486 107873 82067
Kswapd efficiency 99% 99% 98% 96%
Kswapd velocity 1001.153 1129.622 1082.592 1077.474
Direct efficiency 99% 99% 90% 97%
Direct velocity 78.956 47.430 91.431 64.452
kswapd velocity stays at around 1000 pages/second which is reasonable. In
kernel 3.3.6, it was 8140 pages/second.
include/linux/compaction.h | 4 +-
include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
include/linux/mmzone.h | 4 ++
mm/compaction.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
mm/internal.h | 7 +++
mm/page_alloc.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++-----
mm/vmscan.c | 10 ++++
7 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
--
1.7.9.2
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2012-08-08 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-08 19:08 Mel Gorman [this message]
2012-08-08 19:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm: compaction: Update comment in try_to_compact_pages Mel Gorman
2012-08-08 19:08 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: vmscan: Scale number of pages reclaimed by reclaim/compaction based on failures Mel Gorman
2012-08-08 19:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm: compaction: Capture a suitable high-order page immediately when it is made available Mel Gorman
2012-08-09 1:33 ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-09 8:11 ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-09 8:41 ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-08 19:08 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm: have order > 0 compaction start off where it left Mel Gorman
2012-08-08 19:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: have order > 0 compaction start near a pageblock with free pages Mel Gorman
2012-08-09 0:12 ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-09 8:23 ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-09 8:46 ` Minchan Kim
2012-08-09 8:47 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1344452924-24438-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=jaschut@sandia.gov \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).