From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
riel@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, daniel.santos@pobox.com,
aarcange@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] rbtree: add __rb_change_child() helper function
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:08:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1345727281.21476.93.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1208231356010.30263@frira.zrqbmnf.qr>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 252 bytes --]
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 14:05 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> The current use of "inline" is to shut up the compiler, otherwise gcc
> would emit a warning about "function declared but not used".
Don't we have __maybe_unused for that?
--
dwmw2
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 6171 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-23 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-20 22:05 [PATCH v3 0/9] faster augmented rbtree interface Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-20 22:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] rbtree test: fix sparse warning about 64-bit constant Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-20 22:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] rbtree: add __rb_change_child() helper function Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-20 22:17 ` Andrew Morton
2012-08-23 12:05 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-08-23 13:08 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2012-09-26 22:34 ` Daniel Santos
2012-09-26 22:43 ` Andrew Morton
2012-08-20 22:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] rbtree: place easiest case first in rb_erase() Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-20 22:28 ` Andrew Morton
2012-08-20 22:05 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] rbtree: handle 1-child recoloring in rb_erase() instead of rb_erase_color() Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-20 22:05 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] rbtree: low level optimizations in rb_erase() Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-20 22:05 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] rbtree: augmented rbtree test Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-20 22:05 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] rbtree: faster augmented rbtree manipulation Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-20 22:05 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] rbtree: remove prior augmented rbtree implementation Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-20 22:05 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] rbtree: add RB_DECLARE_CALLBACKS() macro Michel Lespinasse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1345727281.21476.93.camel@shinybook.infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel.santos@pobox.com \
--cc=jengelh@inai.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).