Re: dma_alloc_coherent fails in framebuffer

[Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>]

On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 08:42 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Tony,
> 
> On Monday 15 of October 2012 11:26:31 Tony Prisk wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 09:34 +1300, Tony Prisk wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 18:28 +1300, Tony Prisk wrote:
> > > > Up until 07 Oct, drivers/video/wm8505-fb.c was working fine, but on
> > > > the
> > > > 11 Oct when I did another pull from linus all of a sudden
> > > > dma_alloc_coherent is failing to allocate the framebuffer any
> > > > longer.
> > > > 
> > > > I did a quick look back and found this:
> > > > 
> > > > ARM: add coherent dma ops
> > > > 
> > > > arch_is_coherent is problematic as it is a global symbol. This
> > > > doesn't work for multi-platform kernels or platforms which can
> > > > support
> > > > per device coherent DMA.
> > > > 
> > > > This adds arm_coherent_dma_ops to be used for devices which
> > > > connected
> > > > coherently (i.e. to the ACP port on Cortex-A9 or A15). The
> > > > arm_dma_ops
> > > > are modified at boot when arch_is_coherent is true.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> > > > Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > > > Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > This is the only patch lately that I could find (not that I would
> > > > claim
> > > > to be any good at finding things) that is related to the problem.
> > > > Could
> > > > it have caused the allocations to fail?
> > > > 
> > > > Regards
> > > > Tony P
> > > 
> > > Have done a bit more digging and found the cause - not Rob's patch so
> > > apologies.
> > > 
> > > The cause of the regression is this patch:
> > > 
> > > From f40d1e42bb988d2a26e8e111ea4c4c7bac819b7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> > > Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 16:32:36 -0700
> > > Subject: [PATCH 2/3] mm: compaction: acquire the zone->lock as late as
> > > 
> > >  possible
> > > 
> > > Up until then, the framebuffer allocation with dma_alloc_coherent(...)
> > > was fine. From this patch onwards, allocations fail.
> > > 
> > > I don't know how this patch would effect CMA allocations, but it seems
> > > to be causing the issue (or at least, it's caused an error in
> > > arch-vt8500 to become visible).
> > > 
> > > Perhaps someone who understand -mm could explain the best way to
> > > troubleshoot the cause of this problem?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Regards
> > > Tony P
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> > 
> > Have done a bit more testing..
> > 
> > Disabling Memory Compaction makes no difference.
> > Disabling CMA fixes/hides the problem. ?!?!?!
> 
> Could you post your kernel log when it isn't working?
> 
> Do you have the default CMA reserved pool in Kconfig set big enough to 
> serve this allocation?
> 
> I'm not sure what kind of allocation this framebuffer driver does, but if 
> it needs to allocate memory from atomic context then possibly this patch 
> series has something to do with it: 
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/182697/focus=182699
> 
> CC'ing Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> 
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Figa
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

I set CMA to 16MB (and also tried 32MB) in Kconfig, but it made no
difference. The framebuffer is only trying to allocate ~1.5MB via
dma_alloc_coherent().

I haven't captured a kernel log, but will do.

Thanks for the feedback.

Regards
Tony P

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>