From: Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com,
wency@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, lenb@kernel.org, toshi.kani@hp.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] acpi: Introduce prepare_remove device operation
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:22:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1352974970-6643-1-git-send-email-vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com> (raw)
As discussed in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1581581/
the driver core remove function needs to always succeed. This means we need
to know that the device can be successfully removed before acpi_bus_trim /
acpi_bus_hot_remove_device are called. This can cause panics when OSPM-initiated
eject or driver unbind of memory devices fails e.g with:
echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
echo "PNP0C80:XX" > /sys/bus/acpi/drivers/acpi_memhotplug/unbind
since the ACPI core goes ahead and ejects the device regardless of whether the
the memory is still in use or not.
For this reason a new acpi_device operation called prepare_remove is introduced.
This operation should be registered for acpi devices whose removal (from kernel
perspective) can fail. Memory devices fall in this category.
A similar operation is introduced in bus_type to safely handle driver unbind
from the device driver core.
acpi_bus_hot_remove_device and driver_unbind are changed to handle removal in 2
steps:
- preparation for removal i.e. perform part of removal that can fail. Should
succeed for device and all its children.
- if above step was successfull, proceed to actual device removal
With this patchset, only acpi memory devices use the new prepare_remove
device operation. The actual memory removal (VM-related offline and other memory
cleanups) is moved to prepare_remove. The old remove operation just cleans up
the acpi structures. Directly ejecting PNP0C80 memory devices works safely. I
haven't tested yet with an ACPI container which contains memory devices.
v1->v2:
- new patch to introduce bus_type prepare_remove callback. Needed to prepare
removal on driver unbinding from device-driver core.
- v1 patches 1 and 2 simplified and merged in one. acpi_bus_trim does not require
argument changes.
Comments welcome.
Vasilis Liaskovitis (3):
driver core: Introduce prepare_remove in bus_type
acpi: Introduce prepare_remove operation in acpi_device_ops
acpi_memhotplug: Add prepare_remove operation
drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/base/bus.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 2 ++
include/linux/device.h | 2 ++
5 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
1.7.9
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2012-11-15 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-15 10:22 Vasilis Liaskovitis [this message]
2012-11-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] driver core: Introduce prepare_remove in bus_type Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] acpi: Introduce prepare_remove operation in acpi_device_ops Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] acpi_memhotplug: Add prepare_remove operation Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-16 21:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] acpi: Introduce prepare_remove device operation Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 21:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-16 21:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 21:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 22:45 ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-16 23:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-16 23:14 ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-16 23:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-16 23:35 ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-17 0:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-17 0:08 ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-17 0:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-17 0:25 ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-18 16:16 ` Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1352974970-6643-1-git-send-email-vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com \
--to=vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).