From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 28/52] sched: Implement slow start for working set sampling
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 19:43:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1354473824-19229-29-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354473824-19229-1-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org>
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Add a 1 second delay before starting to scan the working set of
a task and starting to balance it amongst nodes.
[ note that before the constant per task WSS sampling rate patch
the initial scan would happen much later still, in effect that
patch caused this regression. ]
The theory is that short-run tasks benefit very little from NUMA
placement: they come and go, and they better stick to the node
they were started on. As tasks mature and rebalance to other CPUs
and nodes, so does their NUMA placement have to change and so
does it start to matter more and more.
In practice this change fixes an observable kbuild regression:
# [ a perf stat --null --repeat 10 test of ten bzImage builds to /dev/shm ]
!NUMA:
45.291088843 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.40% )
45.154231752 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.36% )
+NUMA, no slow start:
46.172308123 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.30% )
46.343168745 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.25% )
+NUMA, 1 sec slow start:
45.224189155 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.25% )
45.160866532 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.17% )
and it also fixes an observable perf bench (hackbench) regression:
# perf stat --null --repeat 10 perf bench sched messaging
-NUMA:
-NUMA: 0.246225691 seconds time elapsed ( +- 1.31% )
+NUMA no slow start: 0.252620063 seconds time elapsed ( +- 1.13% )
+NUMA 1sec delay: 0.248076230 seconds time elapsed ( +- 1.35% )
The implementation is simple and straightforward, most of the patch
deals with adding the /proc/sys/kernel/sched_numa_scan_delay_ms tunable
knob.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
[ Various small fixes ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/sched/core.c | 1 +
kernel/sched/fair.c | 16 ++++++++++------
kernel/sysctl.c | 7 +++++++
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 7e838b0..c020bc7 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2051,6 +2051,7 @@ enum sched_tunable_scaling {
};
extern enum sched_tunable_scaling sysctl_sched_tunable_scaling;
+extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_delay;
extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_min;
extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_max;
extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_size;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 171c126..8ef9a46 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1556,6 +1556,7 @@ static void __sched_fork(struct task_struct *p)
p->numa_scan_seq = p->mm ? p->mm->numa_scan_seq : 0;
p->numa_migrate_seq = 2;
p->numa_faults = NULL;
+ p->numa_scan_period = sysctl_sched_numa_scan_delay;
p->numa_work.next = &p->numa_work;
p->shared_buddy = NULL;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index da28315..8f0e6ba 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -823,11 +823,12 @@ static void account_numa_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
}
/*
- * numa task sample period in ms: 5s
+ * Scan @scan_size MB every @scan_period after an initial @scan_delay.
*/
-unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_min = 100;
-unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_max = 100*16;
-unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_size = 256; /* MB */
+unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_delay = 1000; /* ms */
+unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_min = 100; /* ms */
+unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_max = 100*16;/* ms */
+unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_size = 256; /* MB */
/*
* Wait for the 2-sample stuff to settle before migrating again
@@ -938,10 +939,12 @@ void task_numa_work(struct callback_head *work)
if (time_before(now, migrate))
return;
- next_scan = now + 2*msecs_to_jiffies(sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_min);
+ next_scan = now + msecs_to_jiffies(sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_min);
if (cmpxchg(&mm->numa_next_scan, migrate, next_scan) != migrate)
return;
+ current->numa_scan_period += jiffies_to_msecs(2);
+
start = mm->numa_scan_offset;
pages = sysctl_sched_numa_scan_size;
pages <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT; /* MB in pages */
@@ -998,7 +1001,8 @@ void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
period = (u64)curr->numa_scan_period * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
if (now - curr->node_stamp > period) {
- curr->node_stamp = now;
+ curr->node_stamp += period;
+ curr->numa_scan_period = sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_min;
/*
* We are comparing runtime to wall clock time here, which
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
index a14b8a4..6d2fe5b 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -353,6 +353,13 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
{
+ .procname = "sched_numa_scan_delay_ms",
+ .data = &sysctl_sched_numa_scan_delay,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int),
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
+ },
+ {
.procname = "sched_numa_scan_period_min_ms",
.data = &sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_min,
.maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int),
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-02 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-02 18:42 [PATCH 00/52] RFC: Unified NUMA balancing tree, v1 Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:42 ` [PATCH 01/52] mm/compaction: Move migration fail/success stats to migrate.c Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:42 ` [PATCH 02/52] mm/compaction: Add scanned and isolated counters for compaction Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:42 ` [PATCH 03/52] mm/migrate: Add a tracepoint for migrate_pages Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:42 ` [PATCH 04/52] mm/numa: define _PAGE_NUMA Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:42 ` [PATCH 05/52] mm/numa: Add pte_numa() and pmd_numa() Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:42 ` [PATCH 06/52] mm/numa: Support NUMA hinting page faults from gup/gup_fast Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:42 ` [PATCH 07/52] mm/numa: split_huge_page: transfer the NUMA type from the pmd to the pte Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 08/52] mm/numa: Create basic numa page hinting infrastructure Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 09/52] mm/mempolicy: Make MPOL_LOCAL a real policy Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 10/52] mm/mempolicy: Add MPOL_MF_NOOP Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 11/52] mm/mempolicy: Check for misplaced page Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 12/52] mm/migrate: Introduce migrate_misplaced_page() Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 13/52] mm/mempolicy: Use _PAGE_NUMA to migrate pages Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 14/52] mm/mempolicy: Add MPOL_MF_LAZY Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 15/52] mm/mempolicy: Implement change_prot_numa() in terms of change_protection() Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 16/52] mm/mempolicy: Hide MPOL_NOOP and MPOL_MF_LAZY from userspace for now Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 17/52] mm/numa: Add pte updates, hinting and migration stats Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 18/52] mm/numa: Migrate on reference policy Ingo Molnar
2012-12-03 15:44 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 19/52] sched, numa, mm: Add last_cpu to page flags Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 20/52] mm, numa: Implement migrate-on-fault lazy NUMA strategy for regular and THP pages Ingo Molnar
2012-12-05 0:55 ` David Rientjes
2012-12-05 9:43 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 21/52] sched: Make find_busiest_queue() a method Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 22/52] sched, numa, mm: Add credits for NUMA placement Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 23/52] sched, numa, mm: Describe the NUMA scheduling problem formally Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 24/52] sched: Add adaptive NUMA affinity support Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 25/52] sched, numa: Improve the CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING help text Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 26/52] sched: Implement constant, per task Working Set Sampling (WSS) rate Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 27/52] sched, numa, mm: Count WS scanning against present PTEs, not virtual memory ranges Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 29/52] sched: Implement NUMA scanning backoff Ingo Molnar
2012-12-03 19:55 ` Rik van Riel
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 30/52] sched: Improve convergence Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 31/52] sched: Introduce staged average NUMA faults Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 32/52] sched: Track groups of shared tasks Ingo Molnar
2012-12-03 22:46 ` Rik van Riel
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 33/52] sched: Use the best-buddy 'ideal cpu' in balancing decisions Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 34/52] sched: Average the fault stats longer Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 35/52] sched: Use the ideal CPU to drive active balancing Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 36/52] sched: Add hysteresis to p->numa_shared Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 37/52] sched, numa, mm: Interleave shared tasks Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 38/52] sched, mm, mempolicy: Add per task mempolicy Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 39/52] sched: Track shared task's node groups and interleave their memory allocations Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 40/52] sched: Add "task flipping" support Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 41/52] sched: Move the NUMA placement logic to a worklet Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 42/52] numa, mempolicy: Improve CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING=y OOM behavior Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 43/52] sched: Introduce directed NUMA convergence Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 44/52] sched: Remove statistical NUMA scheduling Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 45/52] sched: Track quality and strength of convergence Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 46/52] sched: Converge NUMA migrations Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 47/52] sched: Add convergence strength based adaptive NUMA page fault rate Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 48/52] sched: Refine the 'shared tasks' memory interleaving logic Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 49/52] mm/rmap: Convert the struct anon_vma::mutex to an rwsem Ingo Molnar
2012-12-04 14:43 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 50/52] mm/rmap, migration: Make rmap_walk_anon() and try_to_unmap_anon() more scalable Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 51/52] sched: Exclude pinned tasks from the NUMA-balancing logic Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 18:43 ` [PATCH 52/52] sched: Add RSS filter to NUMA-balancing Ingo Molnar
2012-12-03 5:09 ` [PATCH 00/52] RFC: Unified NUMA balancing tree, v1 Ingo Molnar
2012-12-03 9:25 ` [GIT] Unified NUMA balancing tree, v2 Ingo Molnar
2012-12-03 15:52 ` [PATCH 00/52] RFC: Unified NUMA balancing tree, v1 Rik van Riel
2012-12-03 17:11 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1354473824-19229-29-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).