From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Clark Williams <clark@redhat.com>, John Kacur <jkacur@gmail.com>,
"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] slub: Check for page NULL before doing the node_match check
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:43:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1358458996.23211.46.camel@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0000013c4a69a2cf-1a19a6f6-e6a3-4f06-99a4-10fdd4b9aca2-000000@email.amazonses.com>
On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 21:28 +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > > @@ -2399,7 +2399,7 @@ redo:
> > >
> > > object = c->freelist;
> > > page = c->page;
We should add a BUG_ON(!page) if it's a problem. I wasted a bit of time
finding this bug just because it triggered in a static inline function,
and I didn't have the vmlinuz file to play with. I had to ask someone
else to do the work for me.
> > > - if (unlikely(!object || !node_match(page, node)))
> > > + if (unlikely(!object || !page || !node_match(page, node)))
> >
> > I'm still trying to see if c->freelist != NULL and c->page == NULL isn't
> > a bug. The cmpxchg_doubles are a little confusing. If it's not expected
> > that page is NULL but freelist isn't than we need to figure out why it
> > happened.
>
> hmmm.. We may want to change the sequence of updates to c->page and
> c->freelist. Update c->freelist to be NULL first so that we always enter
> the slow path for these cases where we can do more expensive
> synchronization.
>
> Index: linux/mm/slub.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/mm/slub.c 2013-01-15 10:42:08.490183607 -0600
> +++ linux/mm/slub.c 2013-01-17 15:27:48.973051155 -0600
> @@ -1993,8 +1993,8 @@ static inline void flush_slab(struct kme
> deactivate_slab(s, c->page, c->freelist);
>
> c->tid = next_tid(c->tid);
> - c->page = NULL;
> c->freelist = NULL;
> + c->page = NULL;
I'm assuming that this is to deal with the same CPU being able to touch
the code?
If so, it requires "barrier()". If this can affect other CPUs, then we
need a smp_wmb() here, and smp_rmb() where it matters.
-- Steve
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -2227,8 +2227,8 @@ redo:
> if (unlikely(!node_match(page, node))) {
> stat(s, ALLOC_NODE_MISMATCH);
> deactivate_slab(s, page, c->freelist);
> - c->page = NULL;
> c->freelist = NULL;
> + c->page = NULL;
> goto new_slab;
> }
>
> @@ -2239,8 +2239,8 @@ redo:
> */
> if (unlikely(!pfmemalloc_match(page, gfpflags))) {
> deactivate_slab(s, page, c->freelist);
> - c->page = NULL;
> c->freelist = NULL;
> + c->page = NULL;
> goto new_slab;
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-17 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-17 18:10 [RFC][PATCH] slub: Check for page NULL before doing the node_match check Steven Rostedt
2013-01-17 18:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-01-17 21:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-01-17 21:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-17 21:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-01-17 21:43 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2013-01-17 21:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-01-17 22:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-01-17 22:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-01-17 23:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-01-17 23:20 ` [RFC][PATCH] slub: Keep page and object in sync in slab_alloc_node() Steven Rostedt
2013-01-18 0:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-01-18 0:28 ` [RFC][PATCH v2] " Steven Rostedt
2013-01-18 4:42 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-01-18 14:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-01-18 15:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-01-18 14:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-01-18 15:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-01-18 15:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-01-18 18:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-01-18 18:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-01-21 1:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-01-21 8:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-01-21 12:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-01-18 18:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-01-18 15:09 ` [RFC][PATCH v3] " Steven Rostedt
2013-01-18 18:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-01-18 19:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-18 19:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-01-21 1:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-01-18 14:43 ` [RFC][PATCH] slub: Check for page NULL before doing the node_match check Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1301171547370.2774@gentwo.org>
2013-01-17 21:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-01-17 22:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-01-17 21:22 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1358458996.23211.46.camel@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=clark@redhat.com \
--cc=jkacur@gmail.com \
--cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).