From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 10/11] kernel: drop voluntary schedule from might_fault
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 17:18:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1369404522-12927-10-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1368702323.git.mst@redhat.com>
might_fault is called from functions like copy_to_user
which most callers expect to be very fast, like
a couple of instructions. So functions like memcpy_toiovec call them
many times in a loop.
But might_fault calls might_sleep() and with CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY
this results in a function call.
Let's not do this - just call __might_sleep that produces
a diagnostic for sleep within atomic, but drop
might_preempt().
Here's a test sending traffic between the VM and the host,
host is built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY:
Before:
incoming: 7122.77 Mb/s
outgoing: 8480.37 Mb/s
after:
incoming: 8619.24 Mb/s
outgoing: 9455.42 Mb/s
As a side effect, this fixes an issue pointed
out by Ingo: might_fault might schedule differently
depending on PROVE_LOCKING. Now there's no
preemption point in both cases, so it's consistent.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/kernel.h | 2 +-
mm/memory.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
index e96329c..c514c06 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ void might_fault(void);
#else
static inline void might_fault(void)
{
- might_sleep();
+ __might_sleep(__FILE__, __LINE__, 0);
}
#endif
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 6dc1882..c1f190f 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -4222,7 +4222,8 @@ void might_fault(void)
if (segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS))
return;
- might_sleep();
+ __might_sleep(__FILE__, __LINE__, 0);
+
/*
* it would be nicer only to annotate paths which are not under
* pagefault_disable, however that requires a larger audit and
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-24 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-16 11:07 [PATCH v2 00/10] uaccess: better might_sleep/might_fault behavior Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:10 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] asm-generic: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/ Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:10 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] arm64: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 13:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-16 11:10 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] frv: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] m32r: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] microblaze: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] mn10300: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] powerpc: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 13:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-22 14:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 13:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 13:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 13:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-16 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] tile: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 13:33 ` Chris Metcalf
2013-05-16 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] x86: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:16 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] kernel: might_fault does not imply might_sleep Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 18:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-19 9:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-19 12:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-19 13:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-19 16:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-19 16:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-19 20:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-19 20:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-21 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-21 11:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-21 11:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-21 13:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 9:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-22 20:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 20:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 9:25 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] uaccess: better might_sleep/might_fault behavior Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-22 9:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-22 11:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 11:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-22 13:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-22 14:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-22 14:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 14:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-05-24 14:18 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] kernel: uaccess in atomic with pagefault_disable Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1369404522-12927-10-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).