linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	hughd@google.com, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 25/35] vmscan: also shrink slab in memcg pressure
Date: Mon,  3 Jun 2013 23:29:54 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1370287804-3481-26-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370287804-3481-1-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org>

Without the surrounding infrastructure, this patch is a bit of a hammer:
it will basically shrink objects from all memcgs under memcg pressure.
At least, however, we will keep the scan limited to the shrinkers marked
as per-memcg.

Future patches will implement the in-shrinker logic to filter objects
based on its memcg association.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
 include/linux/memcontrol.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/shrinker.h   |  6 +++++-
 mm/memcontrol.c            | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 mm/vmscan.c                | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 7b4d9d7..489c6d7 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -200,6 +200,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct page *head);
 bool mem_cgroup_bad_page_check(struct page *page);
 void mem_cgroup_print_bad_page(struct page *page);
 #endif
+
+unsigned long
+memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone);
 #else /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
 struct mem_cgroup;
 
@@ -378,6 +381,12 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_replace_page_cache(struct page *oldpage,
 				struct page *newpage)
 {
 }
+
+static inline unsigned long
+memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
 
 #if !defined(CONFIG_MEMCG) || !defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM)
@@ -430,6 +439,8 @@ static inline bool memcg_kmem_enabled(void)
 	return static_key_false(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
 }
 
+bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
+
 /*
  * In general, we'll do everything in our power to not incur in any overhead
  * for non-memcg users for the kmem functions. Not even a function call, if we
@@ -563,6 +574,12 @@ memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
 	return __memcg_kmem_get_cache(cachep, gfp);
 }
 #else
+
+static inline bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 #define for_each_memcg_cache_index(_idx)	\
 	for (; NULL; )
 
diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
index 0786394..bfa9666 100644
--- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
+++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ struct shrink_control {
 	nodemask_t nodes_to_scan;
 	/* current node being shrunk (for NUMA aware shrinkers) */
 	int nid;
+
+	/* reclaim from this memcg only (if not NULL) */
+	struct mem_cgroup *target_mem_cgroup;
 };
 
 /*
@@ -75,7 +78,8 @@ struct shrinker {
 #define DEFAULT_SEEKS 2 /* A good number if you don't know better. */
 
 /* Flags */
-#define SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE (1 << 0)
+#define SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE	(1 << 0)
+#define SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE	(1 << 1)
 
 extern int register_shrinker(struct shrinker *);
 extern void unregister_shrinker(struct shrinker *);
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index a1982ba..27af2d1 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ static inline void memcg_kmem_set_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 	set_bit(KMEM_ACCOUNTED_ACTIVE, &memcg->kmem_account_flags);
 }
 
-static bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
 	return test_bit(KMEM_ACCOUNTED_ACTIVE, &memcg->kmem_account_flags);
 }
@@ -1044,6 +1044,20 @@ mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid, int zid,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+unsigned long
+memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
+{
+	int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
+	int zid = zone_idx(zone);
+	unsigned long val;
+
+	val = mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid, LRU_ALL_FILE);
+	if (do_swap_account)
+		val += mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid,
+						    LRU_ALL_ANON);
+	return val;
+}
+
 static unsigned long
 mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 			int nid, unsigned int lru_mask)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 7641614..109a3bf 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -139,11 +139,42 @@ static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
 {
 	return !sc->target_mem_cgroup;
 }
+
+/*
+ * kmem reclaim should usually not be triggered when we are doing targetted
+ * reclaim. It is only valid when global reclaim is triggered, or when the
+ * underlying memcg has kmem objects.
+ */
+static bool has_kmem_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+	return !sc->target_mem_cgroup ||
+		memcg_kmem_is_active(sc->target_mem_cgroup);
+}
+
+static unsigned long
+zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(struct scan_control *sc, struct zone *zone)
+{
+	if (global_reclaim(sc))
+		return zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+	return memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(sc->target_mem_cgroup, zone);
+}
+
 #else
 static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
 {
 	return true;
 }
+
+static bool has_kmem_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
+static unsigned long
+zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(struct scan_control *sc, struct zone *zone)
+{
+	return zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+}
 #endif
 
 static unsigned long get_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru)
@@ -332,6 +363,14 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
 	}
 
 	list_for_each_entry(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) {
+		/*
+		 * If we don't have a target mem cgroup, we scan them all.
+		 * Otherwise we will limit our scan to shrinkers marked as
+		 * memcg aware
+		 */
+		if (shrinkctl->target_mem_cgroup &&
+		    !(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE))
+			continue;
 
 		if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE)) {
 			shrinkctl->nid = 0;
@@ -2319,9 +2358,9 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 
 		/*
 		 * Don't shrink slabs when reclaiming memory from
-		 * over limit cgroups
+		 * over limit cgroups, unless we know they have kmem objects
 		 */
-		if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
+		if (has_kmem_reclaim(sc)) {
 			unsigned long lru_pages = 0;
 
 			nodes_clear(shrink->nodes_to_scan);
@@ -2330,7 +2369,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 				if (!cpuset_zone_allowed_hardwall(zone, GFP_KERNEL))
 					continue;
 
-				lru_pages += zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+				lru_pages += zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(sc, zone);
 				node_set(zone_to_nid(zone),
 					 shrink->nodes_to_scan);
 			}
@@ -2598,6 +2637,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 	};
 	struct shrink_control shrink = {
 		.gfp_mask = sc.gfp_mask,
+		.target_mem_cgroup = memcg,
 	};
 
 	/*
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-03 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-03 19:29 [PATCH v10 00/35] kmemcg shrinkers Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 01/35] fs: bump inode and dentry counters to long Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 02/35] super: fix calculation of shrinkable objects for small numbers Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 03/35] dcache: convert dentry_stat.nr_unused to per-cpu counters Glauber Costa
2013-06-05 23:07   ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  1:45     ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-06  2:48       ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  4:02         ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-06 12:40         ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-06 22:25           ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06 23:42             ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-07  6:03               ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 04/35] dentry: move to per-sb LRU locks Glauber Costa
2013-06-05 23:07   ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  1:56     ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-06  8:03     ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-06 12:51       ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 05/35] dcache: remove dentries from LRU before putting on dispose list Glauber Costa
2013-06-05 23:07   ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  8:04     ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 06/35] mm: new shrinker API Glauber Costa
2013-06-05 23:07   ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  7:58     ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 07/35] shrinker: convert superblock shrinkers to new API Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 08/35] list: add a new LRU list type Glauber Costa
2013-06-05 23:07   ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  2:49     ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-06  3:05       ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  4:44         ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-06  7:04           ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  9:03             ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-06  9:55               ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06 11:47                 ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-06 14:28       ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-06  8:10     ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 09/35] inode: convert inode lru list to generic lru list code Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 10/35] dcache: convert to use new lru list infrastructure Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 11/35] list_lru: per-node " Glauber Costa
2013-06-05 23:08   ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  3:21     ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-06  3:51       ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  8:21       ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-06 16:15     ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-06 16:48       ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 12/35] shrinker: add node awareness Glauber Costa
2013-06-05 23:08   ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  3:26     ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-06  3:54       ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  8:23     ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 13/35] vmscan: per-node deferred work Glauber Costa
2013-06-05 23:08   ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  3:37     ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-06  4:59       ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-06  7:12         ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  9:00     ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 14/35] list_lru: per-node API Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 15/35] fs: convert inode and dentry shrinking to be node aware Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 16/35] xfs: convert buftarg LRU to generic code Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 17/35] xfs: rework buffer dispose list tracking Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 18/35] xfs: convert dquot cache lru to list_lru Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 19/35] fs: convert fs shrinkers to new scan/count API Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 20/35] drivers: convert shrinkers to new count/scan API Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 21/35] i915: bail out earlier when shrinker cannot acquire mutex Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 22/35] shrinker: convert remaining shrinkers to count/scan API Glauber Costa
2013-06-05 23:08   ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  3:41     ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-06  8:27       ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 23/35] hugepage: convert huge zero page shrinker to new shrinker API Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 24/35] shrinker: Kill old ->shrink API Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 26/35] memcg,list_lru: duplicate LRUs upon kmemcg creation Glauber Costa
2013-06-05 23:08   ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  8:52     ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 27/35] lru: add an element to a memcg list Glauber Costa
2013-06-05 23:08   ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  8:44     ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 28/35] list_lru: per-memcg walks Glauber Costa
2013-06-05 23:08   ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  8:37     ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 29/35] memcg: per-memcg kmem shrinking Glauber Costa
2013-06-05 23:08   ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  8:35     ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-06  9:49       ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06 12:09         ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-06 22:23           ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-07  6:10             ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:29 ` [PATCH v10 30/35] memcg: scan cache objects hierarchically Glauber Costa
2013-06-05 23:08   ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-03 19:30 ` [PATCH v10 31/35] vmscan: take at least one pass with shrinkers Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:30 ` [PATCH v10 32/35] super: targeted memcg reclaim Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:30 ` [PATCH v10 33/35] memcg: move initialization to memcg creation Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:30 ` [PATCH v10 34/35] vmpressure: in-kernel notifications Glauber Costa
2013-06-03 19:30 ` [PATCH v10 35/35] memcg: reap dead memcgs upon global memory pressure Glauber Costa
2013-06-05 23:09   ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  8:33     ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-05 23:07 ` [PATCH v10 00/35] kmemcg shrinkers Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  3:44   ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-06  5:51   ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-06  7:18     ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  7:37       ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-06  7:47         ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-06  7:59           ` Glauber Costa
2013-06-07 14:15   ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1370287804-3481-26-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org \
    --to=glommer@openvz.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).