From: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de,
david@fromorbit.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, mhocko@suze.cz,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, hughd@google.com, gthelen@google.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v10 03/16] vmscan: also shrink slab in memcg pressure
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 11:56:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1373212616-11713-4-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373212616-11713-1-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org>
Without the surrounding infrastructure, this patch is a bit of a hammer:
it will basically shrink objects from all memcgs under memcg pressure.
At least, however, we will keep the scan limited to the shrinkers marked
as per-memcg.
Future patches will implement the in-shrinker logic to filter objects
based on its memcg association.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++
include/linux/shrinker.h | 6 +++++-
mm/memcontrol.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-
mm/vmscan.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
4 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 7b4d9d7..489c6d7 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -200,6 +200,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct page *head);
bool mem_cgroup_bad_page_check(struct page *page);
void mem_cgroup_print_bad_page(struct page *page);
#endif
+
+unsigned long
+memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone);
#else /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
struct mem_cgroup;
@@ -378,6 +381,12 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_replace_page_cache(struct page *oldpage,
struct page *newpage)
{
}
+
+static inline unsigned long
+memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
#if !defined(CONFIG_MEMCG) || !defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM)
@@ -430,6 +439,8 @@ static inline bool memcg_kmem_enabled(void)
return static_key_false(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
}
+bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
+
/*
* In general, we'll do everything in our power to not incur in any overhead
* for non-memcg users for the kmem functions. Not even a function call, if we
@@ -563,6 +574,12 @@ memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
return __memcg_kmem_get_cache(cachep, gfp);
}
#else
+
+static inline bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
#define for_each_memcg_cache_index(_idx) \
for (; NULL; )
diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
index 68c0970..7d462b1 100644
--- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
+++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ struct shrink_control {
nodemask_t nodes_to_scan;
/* current node being shrunk (for NUMA aware shrinkers) */
int nid;
+
+ /* reclaim from this memcg only (if not NULL) */
+ struct mem_cgroup *target_mem_cgroup;
};
#define SHRINK_STOP (~0UL)
@@ -63,7 +66,8 @@ struct shrinker {
#define DEFAULT_SEEKS 2 /* A good number if you don't know better. */
/* Flags */
-#define SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE (1 << 0)
+#define SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE (1 << 0)
+#define SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE (1 << 1)
extern int register_shrinker(struct shrinker *);
extern void unregister_shrinker(struct shrinker *);
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index f524332..eda075b4 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ static inline void memcg_kmem_set_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
set_bit(KMEM_ACCOUNTED_ACTIVE, &memcg->kmem_account_flags);
}
-static bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
return test_bit(KMEM_ACCOUNTED_ACTIVE, &memcg->kmem_account_flags);
}
@@ -950,6 +950,20 @@ mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid, int zid,
return ret;
}
+unsigned long
+memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
+{
+ int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
+ int zid = zone_idx(zone);
+ unsigned long val;
+
+ val = mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid, LRU_ALL_FILE);
+ if (do_swap_account)
+ val += mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid,
+ LRU_ALL_ANON);
+ return val;
+}
+
static unsigned long
mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
int nid, unsigned int lru_mask)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index e364542..d2d9823 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -139,11 +139,42 @@ static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
{
return !sc->target_mem_cgroup;
}
+
+/*
+ * kmem reclaim should usually not be triggered when we are doing targetted
+ * reclaim. It is only valid when global reclaim is triggered, or when the
+ * underlying memcg has kmem objects.
+ */
+static bool has_kmem_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ return !sc->target_mem_cgroup ||
+ memcg_kmem_is_active(sc->target_mem_cgroup);
+}
+
+static unsigned long
+zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(struct scan_control *sc, struct zone *zone)
+{
+ if (global_reclaim(sc))
+ return zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+ return memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(sc->target_mem_cgroup, zone);
+}
+
#else
static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
{
return true;
}
+
+static bool has_kmem_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ return true;
+}
+
+static unsigned long
+zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(struct scan_control *sc, struct zone *zone)
+{
+ return zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+}
#endif
static unsigned long get_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru)
@@ -331,6 +362,15 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
}
list_for_each_entry(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) {
+ /*
+ * If we don't have a target mem cgroup, we scan them all.
+ * Otherwise we will limit our scan to shrinkers marked as
+ * memcg aware
+ */
+ if (shrinkctl->target_mem_cgroup &&
+ !(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE))
+ continue;
+
for_each_node_mask(shrinkctl->nid, shrinkctl->nodes_to_scan) {
if (!node_online(shrinkctl->nid))
continue;
@@ -2382,11 +2422,11 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
/*
* Don't shrink slabs when reclaiming memory from over limit
- * cgroups but do shrink slab at least once when aborting
- * reclaim for compaction to avoid unevenly scanning file/anon
- * LRU pages over slab pages.
+ * cgroups unless we know they have kmem objects. But do shrink
+ * slab at least once when aborting reclaim for compaction to
+ * avoid unevenly scanning file/anon LRU pages over slab pages.
*/
- if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
+ if (has_kmem_reclaim(sc)) {
unsigned long lru_pages = 0;
nodes_clear(shrink->nodes_to_scan);
@@ -2395,7 +2435,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
if (!cpuset_zone_allowed_hardwall(zone, GFP_KERNEL))
continue;
- lru_pages += zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+ lru_pages += zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(sc, zone);
node_set(zone_to_nid(zone),
shrink->nodes_to_scan);
}
@@ -2652,6 +2692,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
};
struct shrink_control shrink = {
.gfp_mask = sc.gfp_mask,
+ .target_mem_cgroup = memcg,
};
/*
--
1.8.2.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-07 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-07 15:56 [PATCH v10 00/16] kmemcg shrinkers Glauber Costa
2013-07-07 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 01/16] memcg: make cache index determination more robust Glauber Costa
2013-07-07 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 02/16] memcg: consolidate callers of memcg_cache_id Glauber Costa
2013-07-07 15:56 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2013-07-07 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 04/16] memcg: move stop and resume accounting functions Glauber Costa
2013-07-07 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 05/16] memcg,list_lru: duplicate LRUs upon kmemcg creation Glauber Costa
2013-07-07 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 06/16] lru: add an element to a memcg list Glauber Costa
2013-07-07 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 07/16] list_lru: per-memcg walks Glauber Costa
2013-07-07 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 08/16] memcg: move initialization to memcg creation Glauber Costa
2013-07-07 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 09/16] memcg: per-memcg kmem shrinking Glauber Costa
2013-07-07 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 10/16] memcg: scan cache objects hierarchically Glauber Costa
2013-07-07 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 11/16] vmscan: take at least one pass with shrinkers Glauber Costa
2013-07-07 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 12/16] super: targeted memcg reclaim Glauber Costa
2013-07-07 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 13/16] memcg: allow kmem limit to be resized down Glauber Costa
2013-07-07 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 14/16] vmpressure: in-kernel notifications Glauber Costa
2013-07-07 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 15/16] memcg: reap dead memcgs upon global memory pressure Glauber Costa
2013-07-07 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 16/16] memcg: flush memcg items upon memcg destruction Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1373212616-11713-4-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org \
--to=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=glommer@openvz.org \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=mhocko@suze.cz \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).