From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 04/10] sched: Move active_load_balance_cpu_stop to a new helper function
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:18:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1375170505-5967-5-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375170505-5967-1-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Due to the way active_load_balance_cpu gets called and the parameters
passed to it, the active_load_balance_cpu_stop call gets split into
multiple lines. Instead move it into a separate helper function.
this is a cleanup change. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 8fcbf96..debb75a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5103,6 +5103,12 @@ static int need_active_balance(struct lb_env *env)
static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data);
+static void active_load_balance(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ stop_one_cpu_nowait(cpu_of(rq), active_load_balance_cpu_stop, rq,
+ &rq->active_balance_work);
+}
+
/*
* Check this_cpu to ensure it is balanced within domain. Attempt to move
* tasks if there is an imbalance.
@@ -5290,11 +5296,8 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
}
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&busiest->lock, flags);
- if (active_balance) {
- stop_one_cpu_nowait(cpu_of(busiest),
- active_load_balance_cpu_stop, busiest,
- &busiest->active_balance_work);
- }
+ if (active_balance)
+ active_load_balance(busiest);
/*
* We've kicked active balancing, reset the failure
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-30 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-30 7:48 [RFC PATCH 00/10] Improve numa scheduling by consolidating tasks Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-30 7:48 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] sched: Introduce per node numa weights Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-30 7:48 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] sched: Use numa weights while migrating tasks Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-30 7:48 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] sched: Select a better task to pull across node using iterations Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-30 7:48 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2013-07-30 7:48 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] sched: Extend idle balancing to look for consolidation of tasks Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-30 7:48 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] sched: Limit migrations from a node Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-30 7:48 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] sched: Pass hint to active balancer about the task to be chosen Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-30 7:48 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] sched: Prevent a task from migrating immediately after an active balance Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-30 7:48 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] sched: Choose a runqueue that has lesser local affinity tasks Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-30 7:48 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] x86, mm: Prevent gcc to re-read the pagetables Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-30 8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] Improve numa scheduling by consolidating tasks Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-30 8:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-30 9:03 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-30 9:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-30 9:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-30 9:46 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-31 15:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 18:06 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-30 9:15 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-30 9:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-31 17:35 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-31 13:33 ` Andrew Theurer
2013-07-31 15:43 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1375170505-5967-5-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).