From: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
handai.szj@taobao.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] fix unsigned pcp adjustments
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 10:30:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1382895017-19067-1-git-send-email-gthelen@google.com> (raw)
As of v3.11-9444-g3ea67d0 "memcg: add per cgroup writeback pages accounting"
memcg use of __this_cpu_add(counter, -nr_pages) leads to incorrect statistic
values because the negated nr_pages is not sign extended (counter is long,
nr_pages is unsigned int). The memcg fix is __this_cpu_sub(counter, nr_pages).
But that doesn't simply work because __this_cpu_sub(counter, nr_pages) was
implemented as __this_cpu_add(counter, -nr_pages) which suffers the same
problem. Example:
unsigned int delta = 1
preempt_disable()
this_cpu_write(long_counter, 0)
this_cpu_sub(long_counter, delta)
preempt_enable()
Before this change long_counter on a 64 bit machine ends with value 0xffffffff,
rather than 0xffffffffffffffff. This is because this_cpu_sub(pcp, delta) boils
down to:
long_counter = 0 + 0xffffffff
v3.12-rc6 shows that only new memcg code is affected by this problem - the new
mem_cgroup_move_account_page_stat() is the only place where an unsigned
adjustment is used. All other callers (e.g. shrink_dcache_sb) already use a
signed adjustment, so no problems before v3.12. Though I did not audit the
stable kernel trees, so there could be something hiding in there.
Patch 1 creates a test module for percpu operations which demonstrates the
__this_cpu_sub() problems. This patch is independent can be discarded if there
is no interest.
Patch 2 fixes __this_cpu_sub() to work with unsigned adjustments.
Patch 3 uses __this_cpu_sub() in memcg.
An alternative smaller solution is for memcg to use:
__this_cpu_add(counter, -(int)nr_pages)
admitting that __this_cpu_add/sub() doesn't work with unsigned adjustments. But
I felt like fixing the core services to prevent this in the future.
Changes from V1:
- more accurate patch titles, patch logs, and test module description now
referring to per cpu operations rather than per cpu counters.
- move small test code update from patch 2 to patch 1 (where the test is
introduced).
Greg Thelen (3):
percpu: add test module for various percpu operations
percpu: fix this_cpu_sub() subtrahend casting for unsigneds
memcg: use __this_cpu_sub() to dec stats to avoid incorrect subtrahend
casting
arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h | 3 +-
include/linux/percpu.h | 8 +--
lib/Kconfig.debug | 9 +++
lib/Makefile | 2 +
lib/percpu_test.c | 138 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
6 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 lib/percpu_test.c
--
1.8.4.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2013-10-27 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-27 17:30 Greg Thelen [this message]
2013-10-27 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] percpu: add test module for various percpu operations Greg Thelen
2013-11-05 0:09 ` Andrew Morton
2013-11-07 20:29 ` Greg Thelen
2013-10-27 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] percpu: fix this_cpu_sub() subtrahend casting for unsigneds Greg Thelen
2013-10-29 14:26 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-10-27 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] memcg: use __this_cpu_sub() to dec stats to avoid incorrect subtrahend casting Greg Thelen
2013-10-29 14:28 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1382895017-19067-1-git-send-email-gthelen@google.com \
--to=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=handai.szj@taobao.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).