Re: [PATCH -V2 3/5] mm: Move change_prot_numa outside CONFIG_ARCH_USES_NUMA_PROT_NONE

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@au1.ibm.com>]

On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 14:58 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> change_prot_numa should work even if _PAGE_NUMA != _PAGE_PROTNONE.
> On archs like ppc64 that don't use _PAGE_PROTNONE and also have
> a separate page table outside linux pagetable, we just need to
> make sure that when calling change_prot_numa we flush the
> hardware page table entry so that next page access  result in a numa
> fault.

That patch doesn't look right...

You are essentially making change_prot_numa() do whatever it does (which
I don't completely understand) *for all architectures* now, whether they
have CONFIG_ARCH_USES_NUMA_PROT_NONE or not ... So because you want that
behaviour on powerpc book3s64, you change everybody.

Is that correct ?

Also what exactly is that doing, can you explain ? From what I can see,
it calls back into the core of mprotect to change the protection to
vma->vm_page_prot, which I would have expected is already the protection
there, with the added "prot_numa" flag passed down.

Your changeset comment says "On archs like ppc64 [...] we just need to
make sure that when calling change_prot_numa we flush the
hardware page table entry so that next page access  result in a numa
fault."

But change_prot_numa() does a lot more than that ... it does
pte_mknuma(), do we need it ? I assume we do or we wouldn't have added
that PTE bit to begin with...

Now it *might* be allright and it might be that no other architecture
cares anyway etc... but I need at least some mm folks to ack on that
patch before I can take it because it *will* change behaviour of other
architectures.

Cheers,
Ben.

> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mm.h | 3 ---
>  mm/mempolicy.c     | 9 ---------
>  2 files changed, 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 0548eb201e05..51794c1a1d7e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1851,11 +1851,8 @@ static inline pgprot_t vm_get_page_prot(unsigned long vm_flags)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_USES_NUMA_PROT_NONE
>  unsigned long change_prot_numa(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  			unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
> -#endif
> -
>  struct vm_area_struct *find_extend_vma(struct mm_struct *, unsigned long addr);
>  int remap_pfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *, unsigned long addr,
>  			unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size, pgprot_t);
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index c4403cdf3433..cae10af4fdc4 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -613,7 +613,6 @@ static inline int queue_pages_pgd_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_USES_NUMA_PROT_NONE
>  /*
>   * This is used to mark a range of virtual addresses to be inaccessible.
>   * These are later cleared by a NUMA hinting fault. Depending on these
> @@ -627,7 +626,6 @@ unsigned long change_prot_numa(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  			unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
>  {
>  	int nr_updated;
> -	BUILD_BUG_ON(_PAGE_NUMA != _PAGE_PROTNONE);
>  
>  	nr_updated = change_protection(vma, addr, end, vma->vm_page_prot, 0, 1);
>  	if (nr_updated)
> @@ -635,13 +633,6 @@ unsigned long change_prot_numa(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  
>  	return nr_updated;
>  }
> -#else
> -static unsigned long change_prot_numa(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> -			unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_USES_NUMA_PROT_NONE */
>  
>  /*
>   * Walk through page tables and collect pages to be migrated.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>