From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com (mail-pb0-f46.google.com [209.85.160.46]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001B26B0035 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:00:22 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id md12so26450035pbc.5 for ; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 13:00:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from e23smtp09.au.ibm.com (e23smtp09.au.ibm.com. [202.81.31.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id il5si43879312pbb.324.2013.12.05.13.00.20 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Dec 2013 13:00:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp09.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 07:00:18 +1000 Received: from d23relay05.au.ibm.com (d23relay05.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.152]) by d23dlp01.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BC12CE8053 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 08:00:10 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (d23av01.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.96]) by d23relay05.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id rB5KfsoX44630074 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 07:41:54 +1100 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id rB5L08GZ002989 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 08:00:08 +1100 Message-ID: <1386277201.21910.44.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [PATCH -V2 3/5] mm: Move change_prot_numa outside CONFIG_ARCH_USES_NUMA_PROT_NONE From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 08:00:01 +1100 In-Reply-To: <52A0B786.608@redhat.com> References: <1384766893-10189-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1384766893-10189-4-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1386126782.16703.137.camel@pasglop> <52A0B786.608@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Rik van Riel Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , paulus@samba.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 12:27 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: > However, it appears that since the code was #ifdefed > like that, the called code was made generic enough, > that change_prot_numa should actually work for > everything. > > In other words: > > Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel Ok thanks, that's what I needed. Do you have any objection of me merging that change via the powerpc tree along with the corresponding powerpc bits from Aneesh ? The other option would be to have it in a topic branch that I pull from you. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org