[RFC PATCHv3 03/11] percpu: use VMALLOC_TOTAL instead of VMALLOC_END - VMALLOC_START

[Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>]

vmalloc already gives a useful macro to calculate the total vmalloc
size. Use it.

Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
---
 mm/percpu.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index 0d10def..afbf352 100644
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@ -1686,10 +1686,10 @@ int __init pcpu_embed_first_chunk(size_t reserved_size, size_t dyn_size,
 	max_distance += ai->unit_size;
 
 	/* warn if maximum distance is further than 75% of vmalloc space */
-	if (max_distance > (VMALLOC_END - VMALLOC_START) * 3 / 4) {
+	if (max_distance > VMALLOC_TOTAL * 3 / 4) {
 		pr_warning("PERCPU: max_distance=0x%zx too large for vmalloc "
 			   "space 0x%lx\n", max_distance,
-			   (unsigned long)(VMALLOC_END - VMALLOC_START));
+			   VMALLOC_TOTAL);
 #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK
 		/* and fail if we have fallback */
 		rc = -EINVAL;
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>