From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] thp: close race between split and zap huge pages
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:48:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1397598536-25074-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Sasha Levin has reported two THP BUGs[1][2]. I believe both of them have
the same root cause. Let's look to them one by one.
The first bug[1] is "kernel BUG at mm/huge_memory.c:1829!".
It's BUG_ON(mapcount != page_mapcount(page)) in __split_huge_page().
>From my testing I see that page_mapcount() is higher than mapcount here.
I think it happens due to race between zap_huge_pmd() and
page_check_address_pmd(). page_check_address_pmd() misses PMD
which is under zap:
CPU0 CPU1
zap_huge_pmd()
pmdp_get_and_clear()
__split_huge_page()
anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach()
__split_huge_page_splitting()
page_check_address_pmd()
mm_find_pmd()
/*
* We check if PMD present without taking ptl: no
* serialization against zap_huge_pmd(). We miss this PMD,
* it's not accounted to 'mapcount' in __split_huge_page().
*/
pmd_present(pmd) == 0
BUG_ON(mapcount != page_mapcount(page)) // CRASH!!!
page_remove_rmap(page)
atomic_add_negative(-1, &page->_mapcount)
The second bug[2] is "kernel BUG at mm/huge_memory.c:1371!".
It's VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHead(page), page) in zap_huge_pmd().
This happens in similar way:
CPU0 CPU1
zap_huge_pmd()
pmdp_get_and_clear()
page_remove_rmap(page)
atomic_add_negative(-1, &page->_mapcount)
__split_huge_page()
anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach()
__split_huge_page_splitting()
page_check_address_pmd()
mm_find_pmd()
pmd_present(pmd) == 0 /* The same comment as above */
/*
* No crash this time since we already decremented page->_mapcount in
* zap_huge_pmd().
*/
BUG_ON(mapcount != page_mapcount(page))
/*
* We split the compound page here into small pages without
* serialization against zap_huge_pmd()
*/
__split_huge_page_refcount()
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHead(page), page); // CRASH!!!
So my understanding the problem is pmd_present() check in mm_find_pmd()
without taking page table lock.
The bug was introduced by me commit with commit 117b0791ac42. Sorry for
that. :(
Let's open code mm_find_pmd() in page_check_address_pmd() and do the
check under page table lock.
Note that __page_check_address() does the same for PTE entires
if sync != 0.
I've stress tested split and zap code paths for 36+ hours by now and
don't see crashes with the patch applied. Before it took <20 min to
trigger the first bug and few hours for second one (if we ignore
first).
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/g/<53440991.9090001@oracle.com>
[2] https://lkml.kernel.org/g/<5310C56C.60709@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #3.13+
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 5025709bb3b5..d02a83852ee9 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -1536,16 +1536,23 @@ pmd_t *page_check_address_pmd(struct page *page,
enum page_check_address_pmd_flag flag,
spinlock_t **ptl)
{
+ pgd_t *pgd;
+ pud_t *pud;
pmd_t *pmd;
if (address & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK)
return NULL;
- pmd = mm_find_pmd(mm, address);
- if (!pmd)
+ pgd = pgd_offset(mm, address);
+ if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
return NULL;
+ pud = pud_offset(pgd, address);
+ if (!pud_present(*pud))
+ return NULL;
+ pmd = pmd_offset(pud, address);
+
*ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
- if (pmd_none(*pmd))
+ if (!pmd_present(*pmd))
goto unlock;
if (pmd_page(*pmd) != page)
goto unlock;
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2014-04-15 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-15 21:48 Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2014-04-15 23:52 ` [PATCH] thp: close race between split and zap huge pages Bob Liu
2014-04-16 8:42 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-04-17 0:28 ` Bob Liu
2014-04-17 20:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-04-15 21:48 Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-04-16 14:46 ` Sasha Levin
2014-04-16 20:19 ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-18 20:56 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1397598536-25074-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--to=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lliubbo@gmail.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).