From: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Gang Li <gang.li@linux.dev>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page allocation on boot
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 14:52:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13ad8d92-dc69-4088-b3db-16fade43bde3@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db1b593a-41d9-444a-b3f4-f6bffe98634b@bytedance.com>
Hi David Hildenbrand :),
On 2023/11/23 22:10, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Sorry to say, but why is that a scenario worth adding complexity for /
> optimizing for? You don't cover that, so there is a clear lack in the
> motivation.
Regarding your concern about complexity, this is indeed something to
consider. There is a precedent of parallelization in pgdata[1] which
might be reused (or other methods) to reduce the complexity of this
series.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200527173608.2885243-1-daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-28 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-23 13:30 [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page allocation on boot Gang Li
2023-11-23 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] hugetlb: code clean for hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages Gang Li
2023-11-23 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/4] hugetlb: split hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages Gang Li
2023-11-23 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] hugetlb: add timing to hugetlb allocations on boot Gang Li
2023-11-23 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/4] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page allocation Gang Li
2023-11-23 13:58 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page allocation on boot Gang Li
2023-11-23 14:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-24 19:44 ` David Rientjes
2023-11-24 19:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-24 20:00 ` David Rientjes
2023-11-28 3:18 ` Gang Li
2023-11-28 6:52 ` Gang Li [this message]
2023-11-28 8:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-29 19:41 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13ad8d92-dc69-4088-b3db-16fade43bde3@bytedance.com \
--to=ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gang.li@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).