From: "David Wang" <00107082@163.com>
To: "Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>
Cc: kent.overstreet@linux.dev, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] Add accumulated call counter for memory allocation profiling
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:23:32 +0800 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13c19bd1.2c49.1906c1ac5bf.Coremail.00107082@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpGaEJLaWYPidiAG1vtayugQY5vJoFv9Opauh1TrofOv7Q@mail.gmail.com>
HI Suren,
At 2024-07-01 03:33:14, "Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com> wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 8:33 AM David Wang <00107082@163.com> wrote:
>>
>> Accumulated call counter can be used to evaluate rate
>> of memory allocation via delta(counters)/delta(time).
>> This metrics can help analysis performance behaviours,
>> e.g. tuning cache size, etc.
>
>Sorry for the delay, David.
>IIUC with this counter you can identify the number of allocations ever
>made from a specific code location. Could you please clarify the usage
>a bit more? Is the goal to see which locations are the most active and
>the rate at which allocations are made there? How will that
>information be used?
Cumulative counters can be sampled with timestamp, say at T1, a monitoring tool got a sample value V1,
then after sampling interval, at T2, got a sample value V2. Then the average rate of allocation can be evaluated
via (V2-V1)/(T2-T1). (The accuracy depends on sampling interval)
This information "may" help identify where the memory allocation is unnecessary frequent,
and gain some better performance by making less memory allocation .
The performance "gain" is just a guess, I do not have a valid example.
>I'm a bit cautious here because each counter will take more space and
>use some additional cpu cycles.
>Thanks,
>Suren.
>
Thanks~!
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-01 2:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-17 15:32 [PATCH] Add accumulated call counter for memory allocation profiling David Wang
2024-06-30 19:33 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-06-30 19:52 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-07-01 2:23 ` David Wang [this message]
2024-07-01 21:58 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-09-12 2:27 ` David Wang
2024-09-12 16:12 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13c19bd1.2c49.1906c1ac5bf.Coremail.00107082@163.com \
--to=00107082@163.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).