From: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
To: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: mhocko@suse.cz, hannes@cmpxchg.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: avoid scanning the whole targets[*] when scan_balance equals SCAN_FILE/SCAN_ANON
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 16:54:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1402044866-15313-1-git-send-email-slaoub@gmail.com> (raw)
If (scan_balance == SCAN_FILE) is true for shrink_lruvec, then the value of
targets[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] and targets[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON] will be zero. As a result,
the value of 'percentage' will also be zero, and the *whole* targets[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE]
and targets[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] will be scanned.
For (scan_balance == SCAN_ANON), there is the same conditions stated above.
But via https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/10/334, we can find that the kernel does not prefer
reclaiming too many pages from the other LRU. So before recalculating the other LRU scan
count based on its original scan targets and the percentage scanning already complete, we
should need to check whether 'scan_balance' equals SCAN_FILE/SCAN_ANON.
Signed-off-by: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index d51f7e0..ca3f5f1 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2120,6 +2120,9 @@ static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
percentage = nr_file * 100 / scan_target;
}
+ if (targets[lru] == 0 && targets[lru + LRU_ACTIVE] == 0)
+ break;
+
/* Stop scanning the smaller of the LRU */
nr[lru] = 0;
nr[lru + LRU_ACTIVE] = 0;
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2014-06-06 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-06 8:54 Chen Yucong [this message]
2014-06-06 13:12 ` [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: avoid scanning the whole targets[*] when scan_balance equals SCAN_FILE/SCAN_ANON Johannes Weiner
2014-06-06 13:47 ` Chen Yucong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1402044866-15313-1-git-send-email-slaoub@gmail.com \
--to=slaoub@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).