From: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: mgorman@suse.de, mhocko@suse.cz, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: avoid recording the original scan targets in shrink_lruvec()
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:08:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1402452521.28433.26.camel@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140610163338.5b463c5884c4c7e3f1b948e2@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 16:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 21:27:16 +0800 Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Via https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/10/334 , we can find that recording the
> > original scan targets introduces extra 40 bytes on the stack. This patch
> > is able to avoid this situation and the call to memcpy(). At the same time,
> > it does not change the relative design idea.
> >
> > ratio = original_nr_file / original_nr_anon;
> >
> > If (nr_file > nr_anon), then ratio = (nr_file - x) / nr_anon.
> > x = nr_file - ratio * nr_anon;
> >
> > if (nr_file <= nr_anon), then ratio = nr_file / (nr_anon - x).
> > x = nr_anon - nr_file / ratio;
> >
> > ...
> >
>
> Are you sure this is an equivalent-to-before change? If so, then I
> can't immediately see why :(
>
The relative design idea is to keep
ratio
== scan_target[anon] : scan_target[file]
== really_scanned_num[anon] : really_scanned_num[file]
The original implementation is
ratio
== (scan_target[anon] * percentage_anon) /
(scan_target[file] * percentage_file)
To keep the original ratio, percentage_anon should equal to
percentage_file. In other word, we need to calculate the difference
value between percentage_anon and percentage_file, we also have to
record the original scan targets for this.
Instead, we can calculate the *ratio* at the beginning of
shrink_lruvec(). As a result, this can avoid introducing the extra 40
bytes.
In short, we have the same goal: keep the same *ratio* from beginning to
end.
thx!
cyc
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-11 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-09 13:27 [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: avoid recording the original scan targets in shrink_lruvec() Chen Yucong
2014-06-09 23:24 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-10 0:10 ` Chen Yucong
2014-06-10 0:24 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-10 23:33 ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-11 2:08 ` Chen Yucong [this message]
2014-06-11 3:21 ` Chen Yucong
2014-06-16 0:47 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-06-16 6:21 ` Chen Yucong
2014-06-16 12:57 ` Chen Yucong
2014-06-16 23:42 ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-16 23:50 ` Chen Yucong
2014-06-16 23:51 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-16 23:46 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1402452521.28433.26.camel@debian \
--to=slaoub@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).