linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	mgorman@suse.de, mhocko@suse.cz, riel@redhat.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/vmscan.c: wrap five parameters into shrink_result for reducing the stack consumption
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 11:04:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1402715082.750.13.camel@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140613162807.GP2878@cmpxchg.org>

On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 12:28 -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 01:21:15PM +0800, Chen Yucong wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 21:40 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:36:31 +0800 Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > @@ -1148,7 +1146,8 @@ unsigned long reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone,
> > > >  		.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
> > > >  		.may_unmap = 1,
> > > >  	};
> > > > -	unsigned long ret, dummy1, dummy2, dummy3, dummy4, dummy5;
> > > > +	unsigned long ret;
> > > > +	struct shrink_result dummy = { };
> > > 
> > > You didn't like the idea of making this static?
> > Sorry! It's my negligence.
> > If we make dummy static, it can help us save more stack.
> > 
> > without change:  
> > 0xffffffff810aede8 reclaim_clean_pages_from_list []:	184
> > 0xffffffff810aeef8 reclaim_clean_pages_from_list []:	184
> > 
> > with change: struct shrink_result dummy = {};
> > 0xffffffff810aed6c reclaim_clean_pages_from_list []:	152
> > 0xffffffff810aee68 reclaim_clean_pages_from_list []:	152
> > 
> > with change: static struct shrink_result dummy ={};
> > 0xffffffff810aed69 reclaim_clean_pages_from_list []:	120
> > 0xffffffff810aee4d reclaim_clean_pages_from_list []:	120
> 
> FWIW, I copied bloat-o-meter and hacked up a quick comparison tool
> that you can feed two outputs of checkstack.pl for a whole vmlinux and
> it shows you the delta.
> 
> The output for your patch (with the static dummy) looks like this:
> 
> +0/-240 -240
> shrink_inactive_list                         136     112     -24
> shrink_page_list                             208     160     -48
> reclaim_clean_pages_from_list                168       -    -168
> 
> (The stack footprint for reclaim_clean_pages_from_list is actually 96
> after your patch, but checkstack.pl skips frames under 100)
> 
Thanks very much for your comparison tool. Its output is more concise.

thx!
cyc

gcc version 4.7.3 (Gentoo 4.7.3-r1 p1.4, pie-0.5.5)
kernel version 3.15(stable)
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     T5670  @ 1.80GHz

The output for this patch (with the static dummy) is:

+0/-144 -144
shrink_inactive_list                         152     120     -32
shrink_page_list                             232     184     -48
reclaim_clean_pages_from_list                184     120     -64

-------
gcc version 4.7.2 (Debian 4.7.2-5)
kernel version 3.15(stable)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2320 CPU @ 3.00GHz

The output for this patch (with the static dummy) is:

shrink_inactive_list                         136     120     -16
shrink_page_list                             216     168     -48
reclaim_clean_pages_from_list                184     120     -64


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-14  3:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-13  4:36 [PATCH v2] mm/vmscan.c: wrap five parameters into shrink_result for reducing the stack consumption Chen Yucong
2014-06-13  4:40 ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-13  5:21   ` Chen Yucong
2014-06-13 16:28     ` Johannes Weiner
2014-06-14  3:04       ` Chen Yucong [this message]
2014-06-13  4:52 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2014-06-13  5:21   ` Johannes Weiner
2014-06-13 10:21     ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2014-06-13  5:10 ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1402715082.750.13.camel@debian \
    --to=slaoub@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).