linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: minchan@kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	mhocko@suse.cz, riel@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: fix an implementation flaw in proportional scanning
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:55:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1402980902-6345-1-git-send-email-slaoub@gmail.com> (raw)

Via https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/10/897, we can know that the relative design
idea is to keep

    scan_target[anon] : scan_target[file]
        == really_scanned_num[anon] : really_scanned_num[file]

But we can find the following snippet in shrink_lruvec():

    if (nr_file > nr_anon) {
        ...
    } else {
        ...
    }

However, the above code fragment broke the design idea. We can assume:

      nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] = 30
      nr[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE] = 30
      nr[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON] = 0
      nr[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] = 40

When the value of (nr_reclaimed < nr_to_reclaim) become false, there are
the following results:

      nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] = 15
      nr[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE] = 15
      nr[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON] = 0
      nr[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] = 25
      nr_file = 30
      nr_anon = 25
      file_percent = 30 / 60 = 0.5
      anon_percent = 25 / 40 = 0.65

According to the above design idea, we should scan some pages from ANON,
but in fact we execute the an error code path due to "if (nr_file > nr_anon)".
In this way, nr[lru] is likely to be a negative number. Luckily,
"nr[lru] -= min(nr[lru], nr_scanned)" can help us to filter this situation,
but it has rebelled against our design idea.

Signed-off-by: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c |   39 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index a8ffe4e..2c35e34 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2057,8 +2057,7 @@ out:
 static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
 {
 	unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS];
-	unsigned long targets[NR_LRU_LISTS];
-	unsigned long nr_to_scan;
+	unsigned long file_target, anon_target;
 	enum lru_list lru;
 	unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
 	unsigned long nr_to_reclaim = sc->nr_to_reclaim;
@@ -2067,8 +2066,8 @@ static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
 
 	get_scan_count(lruvec, sc, nr);
 
-	/* Record the original scan target for proportional adjustments later */
-	memcpy(targets, nr, sizeof(nr));
+	file_target = nr[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE] + nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE];
+	anon_target = nr[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] + nr[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON];
 
 	/*
 	 * Global reclaiming within direct reclaim at DEF_PRIORITY is a normal
@@ -2087,8 +2086,8 @@ static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
 	blk_start_plug(&plug);
 	while (nr[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] || nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] ||
 					nr[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE]) {
-		unsigned long nr_anon, nr_file, percentage;
-		unsigned long nr_scanned;
+		unsigned long nr_anon, nr_file, file_percent, anon_percent;
+		unsigned long nr_to_scan, nr_scanned, percentage;
 
 		for_each_evictable_lru(lru) {
 			if (nr[lru]) {
@@ -2122,16 +2121,19 @@ static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
 		if (!nr_file || !nr_anon)
 			break;
 
-		if (nr_file > nr_anon) {
-			unsigned long scan_target = targets[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] +
-						targets[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON] + 1;
+		file_percent = nr_file * 100 / file_target;
+		anon_percent = nr_anon * 100 / anon_target;
+
+		if (file_percent > anon_percent) {
 			lru = LRU_BASE;
-			percentage = nr_anon * 100 / scan_target;
+			nr_scanned = file_target - nr_file;
+			nr_to_scan = file_target * (100 - anon_percent) / 100;
+			percentage = nr[LRU_FILE] * 100 / nr_file;
 		} else {
-			unsigned long scan_target = targets[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE] +
-						targets[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] + 1;
 			lru = LRU_FILE;
-			percentage = nr_file * 100 / scan_target;
+			nr_scanned = anon_target - nr_anon;
+			nr_to_scan = anon_target * (100 - file_percent) / 100;
+			percentage = nr[LRU_BASE] * 100 / nr_anon;
 		}
 
 		/* Stop scanning the smaller of the LRU */
@@ -2143,14 +2145,9 @@ static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
 		 * scan target and the percentage scanning already complete
 		 */
 		lru = (lru == LRU_FILE) ? LRU_BASE : LRU_FILE;
-		nr_scanned = targets[lru] - nr[lru];
-		nr[lru] = targets[lru] * (100 - percentage) / 100;
-		nr[lru] -= min(nr[lru], nr_scanned);
-
-		lru += LRU_ACTIVE;
-		nr_scanned = targets[lru] - nr[lru];
-		nr[lru] = targets[lru] * (100 - percentage) / 100;
-		nr[lru] -= min(nr[lru], nr_scanned);
+		nr_to_scan -= min(nr_to_scan, nr_scanned);
+		nr[lru] = nr_to_scan * percentage / 100;
+		nr[lru + LRU_ACTIVE] = nr_to_scan - nr[lru];
 
 		scan_adjusted = true;
 	}
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2014-06-17  4:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-17  4:55 Chen Yucong [this message]
2014-06-18  9:00 ` [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: fix an implementation flaw in proportional scanning Jerome Marchand
2014-06-18  9:08   ` Chen Yucong
2014-06-18  9:54     ` Jerome Marchand
2014-06-18 22:27 ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-19  0:04   ` Chen Yucong
2014-06-19  0:40     ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-19  1:02       ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-19 20:13         ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-23 10:00           ` Mel Gorman
2014-06-23 11:02 ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1402980902-6345-1-git-send-email-slaoub@gmail.com \
    --to=slaoub@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).