From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com (mail-pa0-f44.google.com [209.85.220.44]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4006B0044 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 04:22:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id rd3so10255465pab.3 for ; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 01:22:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lgemrelse6q.lge.com (LGEMRELSE6Q.lge.com. [156.147.1.121]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qs6si26167552pbc.21.2014.07.01.01.22.33 for ; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 01:22:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Joonsoo Kim Subject: [PATCH v3 6/9] slab: use the lock on alien_cache, instead of the lock on array_cache Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 17:27:35 +0900 Message-Id: <1404203258-8923-7-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> In-Reply-To: <1404203258-8923-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> References: <1404203258-8923-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vladimir Davydov , Joonsoo Kim Now, we have separate alien_cache structure, so it'd be better to hold the lock on alien_cache while manipulating alien_cache. After that, we don't need the lock on array_cache, so remove it. Acked-by: Christoph Lameter Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim --- mm/slab.c | 25 ++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c index e1a473d..1c319ad 100644 --- a/mm/slab.c +++ b/mm/slab.c @@ -191,7 +191,6 @@ struct array_cache { unsigned int limit; unsigned int batchcount; unsigned int touched; - spinlock_t lock; void *entry[]; /* * Must have this definition in here for the proper * alignment of array_cache. Also simplifies accessing @@ -512,7 +511,7 @@ static void slab_set_lock_classes(struct kmem_cache *cachep, return; for_each_node(r) { if (alc[r]) - lockdep_set_class(&(alc[r]->ac.lock), alc_key); + lockdep_set_class(&(alc[r]->lock), alc_key); } } @@ -811,7 +810,6 @@ static void init_arraycache(struct array_cache *ac, int limit, int batch) ac->limit = limit; ac->batchcount = batch; ac->touched = 0; - spin_lock_init(&ac->lock); } } @@ -1010,6 +1008,7 @@ static struct alien_cache *__alloc_alien_cache(int node, int entries, alc = kmalloc_node(memsize, gfp, node); init_arraycache(&alc->ac, entries, batch); + spin_lock_init(&alc->lock); return alc; } @@ -1086,9 +1085,9 @@ static void reap_alien(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct kmem_cache_node *n) if (alc) { ac = &alc->ac; - if (ac->avail && spin_trylock_irq(&ac->lock)) { + if (ac->avail && spin_trylock_irq(&alc->lock)) { __drain_alien_cache(cachep, ac, node); - spin_unlock_irq(&ac->lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&alc->lock); } } } @@ -1106,9 +1105,9 @@ static void drain_alien_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, alc = alien[i]; if (alc) { ac = &alc->ac; - spin_lock_irqsave(&ac->lock, flags); + spin_lock_irqsave(&alc->lock, flags); __drain_alien_cache(cachep, ac, i); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ac->lock, flags); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&alc->lock, flags); } } } @@ -1136,13 +1135,13 @@ static inline int cache_free_alien(struct kmem_cache *cachep, void *objp) if (n->alien && n->alien[nodeid]) { alien = n->alien[nodeid]; ac = &alien->ac; - spin_lock(&ac->lock); + spin_lock(&alien->lock); if (unlikely(ac->avail == ac->limit)) { STATS_INC_ACOVERFLOW(cachep); __drain_alien_cache(cachep, ac, nodeid); } ac_put_obj(cachep, ac, objp); - spin_unlock(&ac->lock); + spin_unlock(&alien->lock); } else { n = get_node(cachep, nodeid); spin_lock(&n->list_lock); @@ -1619,10 +1618,6 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void) memcpy(ptr, cpu_cache_get(kmem_cache), sizeof(struct arraycache_init)); - /* - * Do not assume that spinlocks can be initialized via memcpy: - */ - spin_lock_init(&ptr->lock); kmem_cache->array[smp_processor_id()] = ptr; @@ -1632,10 +1627,6 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void) != &initarray_generic.cache); memcpy(ptr, cpu_cache_get(kmalloc_caches[INDEX_AC]), sizeof(struct arraycache_init)); - /* - * Do not assume that spinlocks can be initialized via memcpy: - */ - spin_lock_init(&ptr->lock); kmalloc_caches[INDEX_AC]->array[smp_processor_id()] = ptr; } -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org