linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com,
	kamaleshb@in.ibm.com, hechjie@cn.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, dave.hansen@intel.com,
	dvlasenk@redhat.com, prarit@redhat.com, lwoodman@redhat.com,
	hannsj_uhl@de.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] x86: allow read/write /dev/mem to access non-system RAM above high_memory
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:25:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1408548326-18665-1-git-send-email-fhrbata@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408103043-31015-1-git-send-email-fhrbata@redhat.com>

Hi,

this patch set depends on the following patches posted earlier.

[PATCH V2 1/2] x86: add arch_pfn_possible helper
   lkml: Message-Id: <1408103043-31015-2-git-send-email-fhrbata@redhat.com>
[PATCH V2 2/2] x86: add phys addr validity check for /dev/mem mmap
   lkml: Message-Id: <1408103043-31015-3-git-send-email-fhrbata@redhat.com>

This is an attempt to remove the high_memory limit for the read/write access to
/dev/mem. IMHO there is no reason for this limit on x86. It is presented in 
the generic valid_phys_addr_range, which is used only by (read|write)_mem. IIUIC
it's main purpose is for the generic xlate_dev_mem_ptr, which is using only the
direct kernel mapping __va translation. Since the valid_phys_addr_range is
called as the first check in (read|write)_mem, it basically does not allow to
access anything above high_memory on x86.

The first patch adds high_memory check to x86's (xlate|unxlate)_dev_mem_ptr, so
the direct kernel mapping can be safely used for system RAM bellow high_memory.
This is IMHO the only valid reason to use high_memory check in (read|write)_mem.

The second patch removes the high_memory check from valid_phys_addr_range,
allowing read/write to access non-system RAM above high_memory. So far this was
possible only by using mmap.

I hope I haven't overlooked something.

Many thanks

Frantisek Hrbata (2):
  x86: add high_memory check to (xlate|unxlate)_dev_mem_ptr
  x86: remove high_memory check from valid_phys_addr_range

 arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c | 9 ++++++---
 arch/x86/mm/mmap.c    | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.3

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-20 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-14 14:18 [PATCH 0/1] Prevent possible PTE corruption with /dev/mem mmap Frantisek Hrbata
2014-08-14 14:18 ` [PATCH 1/1] x86: add phys addr validity check for " Frantisek Hrbata
2014-08-14 16:36   ` Dave Hansen
2014-08-14 17:20     ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-14 17:53       ` Frantisek Hrbata
2014-08-14 17:40     ` Frantisek Hrbata
2014-08-15 10:17   ` Frantisek Hrbata
2014-08-15 11:44 ` [PATCH V2 0/2] Prevent possible PTE corruption with " Frantisek Hrbata
2014-08-15 11:44   ` [PATCH V2 1/2] x86: add arch_pfn_possible helper Frantisek Hrbata
2014-08-15 11:44   ` [PATCH V2 2/2] x86: add phys addr validity check for /dev/mem mmap Frantisek Hrbata
2014-08-15 18:10     ` Dave Hansen
2014-08-18 11:26       ` Frantisek Hrbata
2014-08-20 15:25   ` Frantisek Hrbata [this message]
2014-08-20 15:25     ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: add high_memory check to (xlate|unxlate)_dev_mem_ptr Frantisek Hrbata
2014-08-20 15:25     ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: remove high_memory check from valid_phys_addr_range Frantisek Hrbata

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1408548326-18665-1-git-send-email-fhrbata@redhat.com \
    --to=fhrbata@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannsj_uhl@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hechjie@cn.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kamaleshb@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).