From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, hch@infradead.org,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
vgoyal@redhat.com, lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@suse.cz, clm@fb.com,
fengguang.wu@intel.com, david@fromorbit.com,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 13/45] writeback: implement WB_has_dirty_io wb_state flag
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 16:25:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1420579582-8516-14-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420579582-8516-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Currently, wb_has_dirty_io() determines whether a wb (bdi_writeback)
has any dirty inode by testing all three IO lists on each invocation
without actively keeping track. For cgroup writeback support, a
single bdi will host multiple wb's each of which will host dirty
inodes separately and we'll need to make bdi_has_dirty_io(), which
currently only represents the root wb, aggregate has_dirty_io from all
member wb's, which requires tracking transitions in has_dirty_io state
on each wb.
This patch adds inode_wb_list_move_locked() and
inode_wb_list_del_locked() replace direct inode->i_wb_list operations
with them. In addition to the list operations, the two functions keep
track of whether the wb has dirty inodes or not and record it using
the new WB_has_dirty_io flag. inode_wb_list_moved_locked()'s return
value indicates whether the wb had no dirty inodes before.
mark_inode_dirty_dctx() is restructured so that the return value of
inode_wb_list_move_locked() can be used for deciding whether to wake
up the wb.
While at it, change {bdi|wb}_has_dirty_io()'s return values to bool.
These functions were returning 0 and 1 before. Also, add a comment
explaining the synchronization of wb_state flags.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h | 8 ++++
include/linux/backing-dev.h | 8 ++--
mm/backing-dev.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 43c1fb2..1718f5f 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -291,16 +291,62 @@ void bdi_start_background_writeback(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
wb_wakeup(&bdi->wb);
}
+/**
+ * inode_wb_list_move_locked - move an inode onto a bdi_writeback IO list
+ * @inode: inode to be moved
+ * @wb: target bdi_writeback
+ * @head: one of @wb->b_{dirty|io|more_io}
+ *
+ * Move @inode->i_wb_list to @list of @wb and set %WB_has_dirty_io.
+ * Returns %true if all IO lists were empty before; otherwise, %false.
+ */
+static bool inode_wb_list_move_locked(struct inode *inode,
+ struct bdi_writeback *wb,
+ struct list_head *head)
+{
+ assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock);
+
+ list_move(&inode->i_wb_list, head);
+
+ if (wb_has_dirty_io(wb)) {
+ return false;
+ } else {
+ set_bit(WB_has_dirty_io, &wb->state);
+ return true;
+ }
+}
+
+/**
+ * inode_wb_list_del_locked - remove an inode from its bdi_writeback IO list
+ * @inode: inode to be removed
+ * @wb: bdi_writeback @inode is being removed from
+ *
+ * Remove @inode which may be on one of @wb->b_{dirty|io|more_io} lists and
+ * clear %WB_has_dirty_io if all are empty afterwards.
+ */
+static void inode_wb_list_del_locked(struct inode *inode,
+ struct bdi_writeback *wb)
+{
+ assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock);
+
+ list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
+
+ if (wb_has_dirty_io(wb) && list_empty(&wb->b_dirty) &&
+ list_empty(&wb->b_io) && list_empty(&wb->b_more_io))
+ clear_bit(WB_has_dirty_io, &wb->state);
+}
+
/*
* Remove the inode from the writeback list it is on.
*/
void inode_wb_list_del(struct inode *inode)
{
struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(inode);
+ struct bdi_writeback *wb = &bdi->wb;
- spin_lock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
- list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
- spin_unlock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
+ spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
+ inode_wb_list_del_locked(inode, wb);
+ spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
}
/*
@@ -314,7 +360,6 @@ void inode_wb_list_del(struct inode *inode)
*/
static void redirty_tail(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb)
{
- assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock);
if (!list_empty(&wb->b_dirty)) {
struct inode *tail;
@@ -322,7 +367,7 @@ static void redirty_tail(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb)
if (time_before(inode->dirtied_when, tail->dirtied_when))
inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
}
- list_move(&inode->i_wb_list, &wb->b_dirty);
+ inode_wb_list_move_locked(inode, wb, &wb->b_dirty);
}
/*
@@ -330,8 +375,7 @@ static void redirty_tail(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb)
*/
static void requeue_io(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb)
{
- assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock);
- list_move(&inode->i_wb_list, &wb->b_more_io);
+ inode_wb_list_move_locked(inode, wb, &wb->b_more_io);
}
static void inode_sync_complete(struct inode *inode)
@@ -549,7 +593,7 @@ static void requeue_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
redirty_tail(inode, wb);
} else {
/* The inode is clean. Remove from writeback lists. */
- list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
+ inode_wb_list_del_locked(inode, wb);
}
}
@@ -678,7 +722,7 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
* touch it. See comment above for explanation.
*/
if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY))
- list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
+ inode_wb_list_del_locked(inode, wb);
spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
inode_sync_complete(inode);
out:
@@ -1319,25 +1363,23 @@ void mark_inode_dirty_dctx(struct dirty_context *dctx, int flags)
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
spin_lock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
- if (bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi)) {
- WARN(!test_bit(WB_registered, &bdi->wb.state),
- "bdi-%s not registered\n", bdi->name);
- /*
- * If this is the first dirty inode for this
- * bdi, we have to wake-up the corresponding
- * bdi thread to make sure background
- * write-back happens later.
- */
- if (!wb_has_dirty_io(&bdi->wb))
- wakeup_bdi = true;
- }
+ WARN(bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi) &&
+ !test_bit(WB_registered, &bdi->wb.state),
+ "bdi-%s not registered\n", bdi->name);
inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
- list_move(&inode->i_wb_list, &bdi->wb.b_dirty);
+ wakeup_bdi = inode_wb_list_move_locked(inode, &bdi->wb,
+ &bdi->wb.b_dirty);
spin_unlock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
- if (wakeup_bdi)
+ /*
+ * If this is the first dirty inode for this bdi,
+ * we have to wake-up the corresponding bdi thread
+ * to make sure background write-back happens
+ * later.
+ */
+ if (bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi) && wakeup_bdi)
wb_wakeup_delayed(&bdi->wb);
return;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h b/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
index 54a3a9c..d1c0bf4 100644
--- a/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
+++ b/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
@@ -17,10 +17,18 @@ struct dentry;
* Bits in bdi_writeback.state
*/
enum wb_state {
+ /*
+ * The two congested flags are modified asynchronously and must be
+ * atomic. The other flags are protected either by wb->list_lock
+ * or ->work_lock and don't need to be atomic if placed on separate
+ * fields. The extra atomic operations don't really matter here.
+ * Let's keep them together and use atomic bitops.
+ */
WB_async_congested, /* The async (write) queue is getting full */
WB_sync_congested, /* The sync queue is getting full */
WB_registered, /* bdi_register() was done */
WB_writeback_running, /* Writeback is in progress */
+ WB_has_dirty_io, /* Dirty inodes on ->b_{dirty|io|more_io} */
};
typedef int (congested_fn)(void *, int);
diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev.h b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
index 0b1ac4b..533ff86 100644
--- a/include/linux/backing-dev.h
+++ b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ void bdi_start_writeback(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, long nr_pages,
enum wb_reason reason);
void bdi_start_background_writeback(struct backing_dev_info *bdi);
void wb_workfn(struct work_struct *work);
-int bdi_has_dirty_io(struct backing_dev_info *bdi);
+bool bdi_has_dirty_io(struct backing_dev_info *bdi);
void wb_wakeup_delayed(struct bdi_writeback *wb);
extern spinlock_t bdi_lock;
@@ -38,11 +38,9 @@ extern struct list_head bdi_list;
extern struct workqueue_struct *bdi_wq;
-static inline int wb_has_dirty_io(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
+static inline bool wb_has_dirty_io(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
{
- return !list_empty(&wb->b_dirty) ||
- !list_empty(&wb->b_io) ||
- !list_empty(&wb->b_more_io);
+ return test_bit(WB_has_dirty_io, &wb->state);
}
static inline void __add_wb_stat(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
index 2851278..9d69e7c 100644
--- a/mm/backing-dev.c
+++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ static int __init default_bdi_init(void)
}
subsys_initcall(default_bdi_init);
-int bdi_has_dirty_io(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
+bool bdi_has_dirty_io(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
{
return wb_has_dirty_io(&bdi->wb);
}
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-06 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-06 21:25 [PATCHSET RFC block/for-next] writeback: cgroup writeback support Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 01/45] writeback: add struct dirty_context Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 02/45] writeback: add {CONFIG|BDI_CAP|FS}_CGROUP_WRITEBACK Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 03/45] memcg: encode page_cgflags in the lower bits of page->mem_cgroup Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 04/45] memcg, writeback: implement memcg_blkcg_ptr Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 05/45] writeback: make backing_dev_info host cgroup-specific bdi_writebacks Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 06/45] writeback, blkcg: associate each blkcg_gq with the corresponding bdi_writeback Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 07/45] writeback: attribute stats to the matching per-cgroup bdi_writeback Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 08/45] writeback: let balance_dirty_pages() work on the matching cgroup bdi_writeback Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 09/45] writeback: make congestion functions per bdi_writeback Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 10/45] writeback, blkcg: restructure blk_{set|clear}_queue_congested() Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 11/45] writeback, blkcg: propagate non-root blkcg congestion state Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 12/45] writeback: implement and use mapping_congested() Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 14/45] writeback: implement backing_dev_info->tot_write_bandwidth Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 15/45] writeback: make bdi_has_dirty_io() take multiple bdi_writeback's into account Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 16/45] writeback: don't issue wb_writeback_work if clean Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 17/45] writeback: make bdi->min/max_ratio handling cgroup writeback aware Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 18/45] writeback: implement bdi_for_each_wb() Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 19/45] writeback: remove bdi_start_writeback() Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 20/45] writeback: make laptop_mode_timer_fn() handle multiple bdi_writeback's Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 21/45] writeback: make writeback_in_progress() take bdi_writeback instead of backing_dev_info Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:25 ` [PATCH 22/45] writeback: make bdi_start_background_writeback() " Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 23/45] writeback: make wakeup_flusher_threads() handle multiple bdi_writeback's Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 24/45] writeback: add wb_writeback_work->auto_free Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 25/45] writeback: implement bdi_wait_for_completion() Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 26/45] writeback: implement wb_wait_for_single_work() Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 27/45] writeback: restructure try_writeback_inodes_sb[_nr]() Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 28/45] writeback: make writeback initiation functions handle multiple bdi_writeback's Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 29/45] writeback: move i_wb_list emptiness test into inode_wb_list_del() from its caller Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 30/45] vfs, writeback: introduce struct inode_wb_link Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 31/45] vfs, writeback: add inode_wb_link->data point to the associated bdi_writeback Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 32/45] vfs, writeback: move inode->dirtied_when into inode->i_wb_link Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 33/45] writeback: minor reorganization of fs/fs-writeback.c Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 34/45] vfs, writeback: implement support for multiple inode_wb_link's Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 35/45] vfs, writeback: implement inode->i_nr_syncs Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 36/45] writeback: dirty inodes against their matching cgroup bdi_writeback's Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 37/45] writeback: make writeback_control carry the inode_wb_link being served Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 38/45] writeback: make cyclic writeback cursor cgroup writeback aware Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 39/45] writeback: make DIRTY_PAGES tracking " Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 40/45] writeback: make write_cache_pages() " Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 41/45] writeback: make __writeback_single_inode() " Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 42/45] writeback: make __filemap_fdatawrite_range() croup " Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 43/45] buffer, writeback: make __block_write_full_page() honor cgroup writeback Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 44/45] mpage: make __mpage_writepage() " Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:26 ` [PATCH 45/45] ext2: enable cgroup writeback support Tejun Heo
2015-01-06 21:44 ` [PATCHSET RFC block/for-next] writeback: " Tejun Heo
2015-01-07 23:45 ` Dave Chinner
2015-01-09 21:23 ` Tejun Heo
2015-01-10 0:38 ` Dave Chinner
2015-01-10 15:56 ` Tejun Heo
2015-01-10 16:05 ` Tejun Heo
2015-01-08 9:30 ` Jan Kara
2015-01-09 21:36 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1420579582-8516-14-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).