linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 9/9] tools lib traceevent: Honor operator priority
Date: Mon,  6 Apr 2015 14:36:16 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1428298576-9785-10-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428298576-9785-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>

Currently it ignores operator priority and just sets processed args as a
right operand.  But it could result in priority inversion in case that
the right operand is also a operator arg and its priority is lower.

For example, following print format is from new kmem events.

  "page=%p", REC->pfn != -1UL ? (((struct page *)(0xffffea0000000000UL)) + (REC->pfn)) : ((void *)0)

But this was treated as below:

  REC->pfn != ((null - 1UL) ? ((struct page *)0xffffea0000000000UL + REC->pfn) : (void *) 0)

In this case, the right arg was '?' operator which has lower priority.
But it just sets the whole arg so making the output confusing - page was
always 0 or 1 since that's the result of logical operation.

With this patch, it can handle it properly like following:

  ((REC->pfn != (null - 1UL)) ? ((struct page *)0xffffea0000000000UL + REC->pfn) : (void *) 0)

Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
 tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
index 6d31b6419d37..604bea5c3fb0 100644
--- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
+++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
@@ -1939,7 +1939,22 @@ process_op(struct event_format *event, struct print_arg *arg, char **tok)
 			goto out_warn_free;
 
 		type = process_arg_token(event, right, tok, type);
-		arg->op.right = right;
+
+		if (right->type == PRINT_OP &&
+		    get_op_prio(arg->op.op) < get_op_prio(right->op.op)) {
+			struct print_arg tmp;
+
+			/* swap ops according to the priority */
+			arg->op.right = right->op.left;
+
+			tmp = *arg;
+			*arg = *right;
+			*right = tmp;
+
+			arg->op.left = right;
+		} else {
+			arg->op.right = right;
+		}
 
 	} else if (strcmp(token, "[") == 0) {
 
-- 
2.3.2

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-06  5:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-06  5:36 [PATCHSET 0/9] perf kmem: Implement page allocation analysis (v6) Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06  5:36 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf kmem: Respect -i option Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06  5:36 ` [PATCH 2/9] tracing, mm: Record pfn instead of pointer to struct page Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06  5:36 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf kmem: Analyze page allocator events also Namhyung Kim
2015-04-10 21:06   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-04-10 21:10     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-04-13  6:59       ` Namhyung Kim
2015-04-13 13:21         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-04-13 13:40   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-04-06  5:36 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf kmem: Implement stat --page --caller Namhyung Kim
2015-04-13 13:40   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-04-14  2:17     ` Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06  5:36 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf kmem: Support sort keys on page analysis Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06  5:36 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf kmem: Add --live option for current allocation stat Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06  5:36 ` [PATCH 7/9] perf kmem: Print gfp flags in human readable string Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06  5:36 ` [PATCH 8/9] perf kmem: Add kmem.default config option Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06  5:36 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2015-04-06 14:45   ` [PATCH 9/9] tools lib traceevent: Honor operator priority Steven Rostedt
2015-04-07  7:52     ` Namhyung Kim
2015-04-07 13:02       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-04-07 13:57         ` Steven Rostedt
2015-04-07 14:10         ` Namhyung Kim
2015-04-13 13:41   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1428298576-9785-10-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=js1304@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).