From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 9/9] tools lib traceevent: Honor operator priority
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 14:36:16 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1428298576-9785-10-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428298576-9785-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
Currently it ignores operator priority and just sets processed args as a
right operand. But it could result in priority inversion in case that
the right operand is also a operator arg and its priority is lower.
For example, following print format is from new kmem events.
"page=%p", REC->pfn != -1UL ? (((struct page *)(0xffffea0000000000UL)) + (REC->pfn)) : ((void *)0)
But this was treated as below:
REC->pfn != ((null - 1UL) ? ((struct page *)0xffffea0000000000UL + REC->pfn) : (void *) 0)
In this case, the right arg was '?' operator which has lower priority.
But it just sets the whole arg so making the output confusing - page was
always 0 or 1 since that's the result of logical operation.
With this patch, it can handle it properly like following:
((REC->pfn != (null - 1UL)) ? ((struct page *)0xffffea0000000000UL + REC->pfn) : (void *) 0)
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
index 6d31b6419d37..604bea5c3fb0 100644
--- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
+++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
@@ -1939,7 +1939,22 @@ process_op(struct event_format *event, struct print_arg *arg, char **tok)
goto out_warn_free;
type = process_arg_token(event, right, tok, type);
- arg->op.right = right;
+
+ if (right->type == PRINT_OP &&
+ get_op_prio(arg->op.op) < get_op_prio(right->op.op)) {
+ struct print_arg tmp;
+
+ /* swap ops according to the priority */
+ arg->op.right = right->op.left;
+
+ tmp = *arg;
+ *arg = *right;
+ *right = tmp;
+
+ arg->op.left = right;
+ } else {
+ arg->op.right = right;
+ }
} else if (strcmp(token, "[") == 0) {
--
2.3.2
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-06 5:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-06 5:36 [PATCHSET 0/9] perf kmem: Implement page allocation analysis (v6) Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06 5:36 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf kmem: Respect -i option Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06 5:36 ` [PATCH 2/9] tracing, mm: Record pfn instead of pointer to struct page Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06 5:36 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf kmem: Analyze page allocator events also Namhyung Kim
2015-04-10 21:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-04-10 21:10 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-04-13 6:59 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-04-13 13:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-04-13 13:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-04-06 5:36 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf kmem: Implement stat --page --caller Namhyung Kim
2015-04-13 13:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-04-14 2:17 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06 5:36 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf kmem: Support sort keys on page analysis Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06 5:36 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf kmem: Add --live option for current allocation stat Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06 5:36 ` [PATCH 7/9] perf kmem: Print gfp flags in human readable string Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06 5:36 ` [PATCH 8/9] perf kmem: Add kmem.default config option Namhyung Kim
2015-04-06 5:36 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2015-04-06 14:45 ` [PATCH 9/9] tools lib traceevent: Honor operator priority Steven Rostedt
2015-04-07 7:52 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-04-07 13:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-04-07 13:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-04-07 14:10 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-04-13 13:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1428298576-9785-10-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).