From: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, yang.shi@windriver.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, hughd@google.com,
hocko@suse.cz, ralf@linux-mips.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, airlied@linux.ie,
daniel.vetter@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v1 01/15] uaccess: count pagefault_disable() levels in pagefault_disabled
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 17:52:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431359540-32227-2-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431359540-32227-1-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Until now, pagefault_disable()/pagefault_enabled() used the preempt
count to track whether in an environment with pagefaults disabled (can
be queried via in_atomic()).
This patch introduces a separate counter in task_struct to count the
level of pagefault_disable() calls. We'll keep manipulating the preempt
count to retain compatibility to existing pagefault handlers.
It is now possible to verify whether in a pagefault_disable() envionment
by calling pagefault_disabled(). In contrast to in_atomic() it will not
be influenced by preempt_enable()/preempt_disable().
This patch is based on a patch from Ingo Molnar.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
include/linux/uaccess.h | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
kernel/fork.c | 3 +++
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index af01e3c..6df2790 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1792,6 +1792,7 @@ struct task_struct {
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
unsigned long task_state_change;
#endif
+ int pagefault_disabled;
};
/* Future-safe accessor for struct task_struct's cpus_allowed. */
diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h
index ecd3319..23290cc 100644
--- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
+++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
@@ -2,20 +2,36 @@
#define __LINUX_UACCESS_H__
#include <linux/preempt.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
+static __always_inline void pagefault_disabled_inc(void)
+{
+ current->pagefault_disabled++;
+}
+
+static __always_inline void pagefault_disabled_dec(void)
+{
+ current->pagefault_disabled--;
+ WARN_ON(current->pagefault_disabled < 0);
+}
+
/*
- * These routines enable/disable the pagefault handler in that
- * it will not take any locks and go straight to the fixup table.
+ * These routines enable/disable the pagefault handler. If disabled, it will
+ * not take any locks and go straight to the fixup table.
+ *
+ * We increase the preempt and the pagefault count, to be able to distinguish
+ * whether we run in simple atomic context or in a real pagefault_disable()
+ * context.
+ *
+ * For now, after pagefault_disabled() has been called, we run in atomic
+ * context. User access methods will not sleep.
*
- * They have great resemblance to the preempt_disable/enable calls
- * and in fact they are identical; this is because currently there is
- * no other way to make the pagefault handlers do this. So we do
- * disable preemption but we don't necessarily care about that.
*/
static inline void pagefault_disable(void)
{
preempt_count_inc();
+ pagefault_disabled_inc();
/*
* make sure to have issued the store before a pagefault
* can hit.
@@ -25,18 +41,24 @@ static inline void pagefault_disable(void)
static inline void pagefault_enable(void)
{
-#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT
/*
* make sure to issue those last loads/stores before enabling
* the pagefault handler again.
*/
barrier();
+ pagefault_disabled_dec();
+#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT
preempt_count_dec();
#else
preempt_enable();
#endif
}
+/*
+ * Is the pagefault handler disabled? If so, user access methods will not sleep.
+ */
+#define pagefault_disabled() (current->pagefault_disabled != 0)
+
#ifndef ARCH_HAS_NOCACHE_UACCESS
static inline unsigned long __copy_from_user_inatomic_nocache(void *to,
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 2e67086..0bb88b5 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1393,6 +1393,9 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
p->hardirq_context = 0;
p->softirq_context = 0;
#endif
+
+ p->pagefault_disabled = 0;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
p->lockdep_depth = 0; /* no locks held yet */
p->curr_chain_key = 0;
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-11 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-11 15:52 [PATCH v1 00/15] decouple pagefault_disable() from preempt_disable() David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 02/15] mm, uaccess: trigger might_sleep() in might_fault() with disabled pagefaults David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 03/15] uaccess: clarify that uaccess may only sleep if pagefaults are enabled David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 04/15] mm: explicitly disable/enable preemption in kmap_atomic_* David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 05/15] mips: kmap_coherent relies on disabled preemption David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 06/15] mm: use pagefault_disable() to check for disabled pagefaults in the handler David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 07/15] drm/i915: use pagefault_disabled() to check for disabled pagefaults David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 08/15] futex: UP futex_atomic_op_inuser() relies on disabled preemption David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 09/15] futex: UP futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() " David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 10/15] arm/futex: " David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 11/15] arm/futex: UP futex_atomic_op_inuser() " David Hildenbrand
2015-05-12 19:00 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-05-13 7:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2015-05-13 8:19 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-05-13 8:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 12/15] futex: clarify that preemption doesn't have to be disabled David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 13/15] powerpc: enable_kernel_altivec() requires disabled preemption David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 14/15] mips: properly lock access to the fpu David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 15/15] uaccess: decouple preemption from the pagefault logic David Hildenbrand
2015-05-15 14:23 ` [PATCH v1 00/15] decouple pagefault_disable() from preempt_disable() Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-18 12:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2015-05-18 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1431359540-32227-2-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hocko@suse.cz \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yang.shi@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).