linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, yang.shi@windriver.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, hughd@google.com,
	hocko@suse.cz, ralf@linux-mips.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
	linux@arm.linux.org.uk, airlied@linux.ie,
	daniel.vetter@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v1 01/15] uaccess: count pagefault_disable() levels in pagefault_disabled
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 17:52:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431359540-32227-2-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431359540-32227-1-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Until now, pagefault_disable()/pagefault_enabled() used the preempt
count to track whether in an environment with pagefaults disabled (can
be queried via in_atomic()).

This patch introduces a separate counter in task_struct to count the
level of pagefault_disable() calls. We'll keep manipulating the preempt
count to retain compatibility to existing pagefault handlers.

It is now possible to verify whether in a pagefault_disable() envionment
by calling pagefault_disabled(). In contrast to in_atomic() it will not
be influenced by preempt_enable()/preempt_disable().

This patch is based on a patch from Ingo Molnar.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h   |  1 +
 include/linux/uaccess.h | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 kernel/fork.c           |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index af01e3c..6df2790 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1792,6 +1792,7 @@ struct task_struct {
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
 	unsigned long	task_state_change;
 #endif
+	int pagefault_disabled;
 };
 
 /* Future-safe accessor for struct task_struct's cpus_allowed. */
diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h
index ecd3319..23290cc 100644
--- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
+++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
@@ -2,20 +2,36 @@
 #define __LINUX_UACCESS_H__
 
 #include <linux/preempt.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 
+static __always_inline void pagefault_disabled_inc(void)
+{
+	current->pagefault_disabled++;
+}
+
+static __always_inline void pagefault_disabled_dec(void)
+{
+	current->pagefault_disabled--;
+	WARN_ON(current->pagefault_disabled < 0);
+}
+
 /*
- * These routines enable/disable the pagefault handler in that
- * it will not take any locks and go straight to the fixup table.
+ * These routines enable/disable the pagefault handler. If disabled, it will
+ * not take any locks and go straight to the fixup table.
+ *
+ * We increase the preempt and the pagefault count, to be able to distinguish
+ * whether we run in simple atomic context or in a real pagefault_disable()
+ * context.
+ *
+ * For now, after pagefault_disabled() has been called, we run in atomic
+ * context. User access methods will not sleep.
  *
- * They have great resemblance to the preempt_disable/enable calls
- * and in fact they are identical; this is because currently there is
- * no other way to make the pagefault handlers do this. So we do
- * disable preemption but we don't necessarily care about that.
  */
 static inline void pagefault_disable(void)
 {
 	preempt_count_inc();
+	pagefault_disabled_inc();
 	/*
 	 * make sure to have issued the store before a pagefault
 	 * can hit.
@@ -25,18 +41,24 @@ static inline void pagefault_disable(void)
 
 static inline void pagefault_enable(void)
 {
-#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT
 	/*
 	 * make sure to issue those last loads/stores before enabling
 	 * the pagefault handler again.
 	 */
 	barrier();
+	pagefault_disabled_dec();
+#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT
 	preempt_count_dec();
 #else
 	preempt_enable();
 #endif
 }
 
+/*
+ * Is the pagefault handler disabled? If so, user access methods will not sleep.
+ */
+#define pagefault_disabled() (current->pagefault_disabled != 0)
+
 #ifndef ARCH_HAS_NOCACHE_UACCESS
 
 static inline unsigned long __copy_from_user_inatomic_nocache(void *to,
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 2e67086..0bb88b5 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1393,6 +1393,9 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
 	p->hardirq_context = 0;
 	p->softirq_context = 0;
 #endif
+
+	p->pagefault_disabled = 0;
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
 	p->lockdep_depth = 0; /* no locks held yet */
 	p->curr_chain_key = 0;
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-11 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-11 15:52 [PATCH v1 00/15] decouple pagefault_disable() from preempt_disable() David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 02/15] mm, uaccess: trigger might_sleep() in might_fault() with disabled pagefaults David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 03/15] uaccess: clarify that uaccess may only sleep if pagefaults are enabled David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 04/15] mm: explicitly disable/enable preemption in kmap_atomic_* David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 05/15] mips: kmap_coherent relies on disabled preemption David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 06/15] mm: use pagefault_disable() to check for disabled pagefaults in the handler David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 07/15] drm/i915: use pagefault_disabled() to check for disabled pagefaults David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 08/15] futex: UP futex_atomic_op_inuser() relies on disabled preemption David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 09/15] futex: UP futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() " David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 10/15] arm/futex: " David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 11/15] arm/futex: UP futex_atomic_op_inuser() " David Hildenbrand
2015-05-12 19:00   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-05-13  7:38     ` David Hildenbrand
2015-05-13  8:19       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-05-13  8:55         ` David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 12/15] futex: clarify that preemption doesn't have to be disabled David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 13/15] powerpc: enable_kernel_altivec() requires disabled preemption David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 14/15] mips: properly lock access to the fpu David Hildenbrand
2015-05-11 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 15/15] uaccess: decouple preemption from the pagefault logic David Hildenbrand
2015-05-15 14:23 ` [PATCH v1 00/15] decouple pagefault_disable() from preempt_disable() Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-18 12:46   ` David Hildenbrand
2015-05-18 13:04     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1431359540-32227-2-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=hocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yang.shi@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).