From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC 0/3] get rid of mm_struct::owner
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 13:50:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1432641006-8025-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz> (raw)
Hi,
this small series drops IMO awkward mm_struct::owner field which is
used to track task which owns the mm_struct and which is then used for
mm->mem_cgroup mapping. The motivation for the change and drawback
(namely user visible change of behavior) is described in the patch 3.
The first patch is a trivial cleanup by Tejun
(http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=143197860820270) and I have added it
here just to prevent from conflicts with his changes.
Patch 2 is preparatory and it shouldn't cause any functional changes.
It simply replaces mc.to as an indicator of the charge migration
during task move by using mc.moving_task because we need to have mc.to
available even when the charges are not migrated.
I am sending this as an RFC because of the user visible aspect of the
change. I am not convinced that there is a strong usecase to justify
keeping mm->owner but I would like to hear back first.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2015-05-26 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-26 11:50 Michal Hocko [this message]
2015-05-26 11:50 ` [RFC 1/3] memcg: restructure mem_cgroup_can_attach() Michal Hocko
2015-05-26 11:50 ` [RFC 2/3] memcg: Use mc.moving_task as the indication for charge moving Michal Hocko
2015-05-26 11:50 ` [RFC 3/3] memcg: get rid of mm_struct::owner Michal Hocko
2015-05-26 14:10 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-05-26 15:11 ` Michal Hocko
2015-05-26 17:20 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-05-27 14:48 ` Michal Hocko
2015-05-28 21:07 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-29 12:08 ` Michal Hocko
2015-05-29 13:10 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-29 13:45 ` Michal Hocko
2015-05-29 14:07 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-29 14:57 ` Michal Hocko
2015-05-29 15:23 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-29 15:26 ` Michal Hocko
2015-05-26 16:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-26 17:22 ` Michal Hocko
2015-05-26 17:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-27 9:43 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1432641006-8025-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).