linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: use srcu for shrinkers
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 18:33:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1434591216.1903.44.camel@stgolabs.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150617074751.GC25056@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 09:47 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On the other hand using srcu is a neat idea. Shrinkers only need the
> existence guarantee when racing with unregister. Register even shouldn't
> be that interesting because such a shrinker wouldn't have much to
> shrink anyway so we can safely miss it AFAIU. With the srcu read lock
> we can finally get rid of the try_lock. I do not think you need an
> ugly spin_is_locked as the replacement though. We have the existence
> guarantee and that should be sufficient.

So the reason for the spin_is_locked check was that I was concerned
about new reader(s) that come in while doing the registry. Currently
this is forbidden by the trylock and fake-ish retry. But yes, perhaps I
was being over safe and we shouldn't be blockling the reclaim simply
because a shrinker is registering. And it would be cleaner to get rid of
the whole retry idea and just use rcu guarantees.

This is probably a little late in the game to try to push for 4.2, so
I'll send a v2 with any other updates that might come up once the merge
window closes.

Thanks,
Davidlohr

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-18  1:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-15 20:03 [PATCH] mm: use srcu for shrinkers Davidlohr Bueso
2015-06-17  7:47 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-18  1:33   ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2015-07-16 20:55 ` [PATCH -next v2] mm: srcu-ify shrinkers Davidlohr Bueso
2015-07-21 12:19   ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-24 14:25     ` Paul Gortmaker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1434591216.1903.44.camel@stgolabs.net \
    --to=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).