From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: travis@sgi.com, roland@purestorage.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
mcgrof@suse.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 2/3] mm, x86: Remove region_is_ram() call from ioremap
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:23:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1437088996-28511-3-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437088996-28511-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hp.com>
__ioremap_caller() calls region_is_ram() to walk through the
iomem_resource table to check if a target range is in RAM, which
was added to improve the lookup performance over page_is_ram()
(commit 906e36c5c717 "x86: use optimized ioresource lookup in
ioremap function"). page_is_ram() was no longer used when this
change was added, though.
__ioremap_caller() then calls walk_system_ram_range(), which had
replaced page_is_ram() to improve the lookup performance (commit
c81c8a1eeede "x86, ioremap: Speed up check for RAM pages").
Since both checks walk through the same iomem_resource table for
the same purpose, there is no need to call the two functions.
Furthermore, region_is_ram() always returns with -1, which makes
walk_system_ram_range() as the only check being used at this point.
Therefore, this patch changes __ioremap_caller() to call
walk_system_ram_range() only.
Note, removing the call to region_is_ram() is also necessary to
fix bugs in region_is_ram(). walk_system_ram_range() requires
RAM ranges be page-aligned in the iomem_resource table to work
properly. This restriction has allowed multiple ioremaps to RAM
(setup_data) which are page-unaligned. Using fixed region_is_ram()
will cause these callers to start failing. After all ioremap
callers to setup_data are converted, __ioremap_caller() may call
region_is_ram() instead to remove this restriction.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@suse.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
---
arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c | 24 ++++++------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
index fd3df0d..b9d4a33 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
@@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ static void __iomem *__ioremap_caller(resource_size_t phys_addr,
pgprot_t prot;
int retval;
void __iomem *ret_addr;
- int ram_region;
/* Don't allow wraparound or zero size */
last_addr = phys_addr + size - 1;
@@ -115,26 +114,15 @@ static void __iomem *__ioremap_caller(resource_size_t phys_addr,
/*
* Don't allow anybody to remap normal RAM that we're using..
*/
- /* First check if whole region can be identified as RAM or not */
- ram_region = region_is_ram(phys_addr, size);
- if (ram_region > 0) {
- WARN_ONCE(1, "ioremap on RAM at 0x%lx - 0x%lx\n",
- (unsigned long int)phys_addr,
- (unsigned long int)last_addr);
- return NULL;
- }
-
- /* If could not be identified(-1), check page by page */
- if (ram_region < 0) {
- pfn = phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- last_pfn = last_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- if (walk_system_ram_range(pfn, last_pfn - pfn + 1, NULL,
+ pfn = phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ last_pfn = last_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ if (walk_system_ram_range(pfn, last_pfn - pfn + 1, NULL,
__ioremap_check_ram) == 1) {
- WARN_ONCE(1, "ioremap on RAM at 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
+ WARN_ONCE(1, "ioremap on RAM at 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
phys_addr, last_addr);
- return NULL;
- }
+ return NULL;
}
+
/*
* Mappings have to be page-aligned
*/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-16 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-16 23:23 [PATCH RESEND 0/3] mm, x86: Fix ioremap RAM check interfaces Toshi Kani
2015-07-16 23:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/3] mm, x86: Fix warning in ioremap RAM check Toshi Kani
2015-07-16 23:23 ` Toshi Kani [this message]
2015-07-21 14:31 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/3] mm, x86: Remove region_is_ram() call from ioremap Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-21 15:07 ` Toshi Kani
2015-07-16 23:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/3] mm: Fix bugs in region_is_ram() Toshi Kani
2015-07-18 1:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 0/3] mm, x86: Fix ioremap RAM check interfaces Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1437088996-28511-3-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hp.com \
--to=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mcgrof@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@purestorage.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).