linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: "Jörn Engel" <joern@purestorage.com>,
	"Spencer Baugh" <sbaugh@catern.com>,
	"Toshi Kani" <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Fengguang Wu" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	"Joern Engel" <joern@logfs.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Shachar Raindel" <raindel@mellanox.com>,
	"Boaz Harrosh" <boaz@plexistor.com>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@amacapital.net>,
	"Joonsoo Kim" <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	"Andrey Ryabinin" <a.ryabinin@samsung.com>,
	"Roman Pen" <r.peniaev@gmail.com>,
	"Andrey Konovalov" <adech.fo@gmail.com>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
	"Rob Jones" <rob.jones@codethink.co.uk>,
	"WANG Chao" <chaowang@redhat.com>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"Spencer Baugh" <Spencer.baugh@purestorage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add resched points to remap_pmd_range/ioremap_pmd_range
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:29:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1437985792.3838.21.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150727070840.GB11317@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 09:08 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 24-07-15 09:56:27, JA?rn Engel wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:04:21AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Thu 23-07-15 14:54:33, Spencer Baugh wrote:
> > > > From: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
> > > > 
> > > > Mapping large memory spaces can be slow and prevent high-priority
> > > > realtime threads from preempting lower-priority threads for a long time.
> > > 
> > > How can a lower priority task block the high priority one? Do you have
> > > preemption disabled?
> > 
> > Yes.
> 
> Yes what? PREEMT enabled and still low priority task starving a high
> priority one? What is your exact setup?

There are other places that are pretty horrible too if you don't run a
PREEMPT kernel.  Spending milliseconds in kernel kinda takes the real
outta realtime, even for the most casual of users.

(ponder: preempt kernel for rt only, rt could have decent latency
without driving normal task throughput through the floor)

kbuild make -j8 + cyclictest -Smp99

PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY Before:
T: 0 ( 6459) P:99 I:1000 C: 286022 Min:      1 Act:    1 Avg:    5 Max:    1718
T: 1 ( 6460) P:99 I:1500 C: 190701 Min:      1 Act:    1 Avg:    5 Max:    1639
T: 2 ( 6461) P:99 I:2000 C: 143024 Min:      1 Act:    2 Avg:    5 Max:    2504
T: 3 ( 6462) P:99 I:2500 C: 114420 Min:      1 Act:    1 Avg:    5 Max:    1922
T: 4 ( 6463) P:99 I:3000 C:  95350 Min:      1 Act:    1 Avg:    5 Max:    1482
T: 5 ( 6464) P:99 I:3500 C:  81728 Min:      1 Act:    2 Avg:    5 Max:    1496
T: 6 ( 6465) P:99 I:4000 C:  71511 Min:      1 Act:    1 Avg:    5 Max:    1813
T: 7 ( 6466) P:99 I:4500 C:  63566 Min:      1 Act:    1 Avg:    5 Max:    1901

PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY After:
T: 0 ( 6997) P:99 I:1000 C: 286032 Min:      1 Act:    2 Avg:    3 Max:     125
T: 1 ( 6998) P:99 I:1500 C: 190687 Min:      1 Act:    1 Avg:    4 Max:     130
T: 2 ( 6999) P:99 I:2000 C: 143015 Min:      1 Act:    1 Avg:    4 Max:      97
T: 3 ( 7000) P:99 I:2500 C: 114411 Min:      1 Act:    2 Avg:    4 Max:      90
T: 4 ( 7001) P:99 I:3000 C:  95341 Min:      1 Act:    1 Avg:    4 Max:     139
T: 5 ( 7002) P:99 I:3500 C:  81722 Min:      1 Act:    2 Avg:    4 Max:     112
T: 6 ( 7003) P:99 I:4000 C:  71506 Min:      1 Act:    2 Avg:    4 Max:     137
T: 7 ( 7004) P:99 I:4500 C:  63561 Min:      1 Act:    2 Avg:    4 Max:     109

---
 mm/memory.c     |    8 ++++++--
 mm/page_alloc.c |    1 +
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -1174,8 +1174,10 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struc
 		force_flush = 0;
 		tlb_flush_mmu_free(tlb);
 
-		if (addr != end)
+		if (addr != end) {
+			cond_resched();
 			goto again;
+		}
 	}
 
 	return addr;
@@ -1336,8 +1338,10 @@ void unmap_vmas(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
 
 	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(mm, start_addr, end_addr);
-	for ( ; vma && vma->vm_start < end_addr; vma = vma->vm_next)
+	for ( ; vma && vma->vm_start < end_addr; vma = vma->vm_next) {
 		unmap_single_vma(tlb, vma, start_addr, end_addr, NULL);
+		cond_resched();
+	}
 	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, start_addr, end_addr);
 }
 
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1934,6 +1934,7 @@ void free_hot_cold_page_list(struct list
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(page, next, list, lru) {
 		trace_mm_page_free_batched(page, cold);
 		free_hot_cold_page(page, cold);
+		cond_resched();
 	}
 }
 




--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-27  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-23 21:54 [PATCH] mm: add resched points to remap_pmd_range/ioremap_pmd_range Spencer Baugh
2015-07-23 23:32 ` Toshi Kani
2015-07-24 17:00   ` Jörn Engel
2015-07-24  7:04 ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-24 16:56   ` Jörn Engel
2015-07-27  7:08     ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-27  8:29       ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2015-07-27 15:18       ` Jörn Engel
2015-07-28 13:32         ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-28 17:08           ` Jörn Engel
2015-07-29  9:54             ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-30 15:22               ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-30 16:58                 ` Jörn Engel
2015-07-30 18:55                   ` Mike Galbraith
2015-08-09  9:25                     ` [hack] sched: create PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY_RT and some RT specific resched points Mike Galbraith
2015-08-09 10:51                       ` Mike Galbraith
2015-08-06  8:55                   ` [PATCH] mm: add resched points to remap_pmd_range/ioremap_pmd_range Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1437985792.3838.21.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    --cc=Spencer.baugh@purestorage.com \
    --cc=a.ryabinin@samsung.com \
    --cc=adech.fo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boaz@plexistor.com \
    --cc=chaowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=joern@logfs.org \
    --cc=joern@purestorage.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=r.peniaev@gmail.com \
    --cc=raindel@mellanox.com \
    --cc=rob.jones@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=sbaugh@catern.com \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).