From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
mauricio.porto@hpe.com, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix mmap MAP_POPULATE for DAX pmd mapping
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 17:21:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1449102105.9855.15.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449078237.31589.30.camel@hpe.com>
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 10:43 -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 19:45 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 14:08 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
:
> > > >
> > > > Hey Toshi,
> > > >
> > > > I ended up fixing this differently with follow_pmd_devmap() introduced
> > > > in this series:
> > > >
> > > > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2015-November/003033.html
> > > >
> > > > Does the latest libnvdimm-pending branch [1] pass your test case?
> > >
> > > Hi Dan,
> > >
> > > I ran several test cases, and they all hit the case "pfn not in memmap" in
> > > __dax_pmd_fault() during mmap(MAP_POPULATE). Looking at the dax.pfn,
> > > PFN_DEV is set but PFN_MAP is not. I have not looked into why, but I
> > > thought I let you know first. I've also seen the test thread got hung up
> > > at the end sometime.
> >
> > That PFN_MAP flag will not be set by default for NFIT-defined
> > persistent memory. See pmem_should_map_pages() for pmem namespaces
> > that will have it set by default, currently only e820 type-12 memory
> > ranges.
> >
> > NFIT-defined persistent memory can have a memmap array dynamically
> > allocated by setting up a pfn device (similar to setting up a btt).
> > We don't map it by default because the NFIT may describe hundreds of
> > gigabytes of persistent and the overhead of the memmap may be too
> > large to locate the memmap in ram.
>
> Oh, I see. I will setup the memmap array and run the tests again.
I setup a pfn device, and ran a few test cases again. Yes, it solved the
PFN_MAP issue. However, I am no longer able to allocate FS blocks aligned by
2MB, so PMD faults fall back to PTE. They are off by 2 pages, which I suspect
due to the pfn metadata. If I pass a 2MB-aligned+2pages virtual address to
mmap(MAP_POPULATE), the mmap() call gets hung up.
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-02 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-23 20:04 [PATCH] mm: Fix mmap MAP_POPULATE for DAX pmd mapping Toshi Kani
2015-11-23 20:53 ` Dan Williams
2015-11-23 22:15 ` Toshi Kani
2015-11-30 22:08 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-02 2:19 ` Toshi Kani
2015-12-02 3:45 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-02 17:43 ` Toshi Kani
2015-12-02 17:01 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-02 18:06 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-02 19:26 ` Toshi Kani
2015-12-02 19:00 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-02 20:02 ` Toshi Kani
2015-12-02 20:12 ` Toshi Kani
2015-12-02 19:57 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-02 21:37 ` Toshi Kani
2015-12-02 20:54 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-02 21:55 ` Toshi Kani
2015-12-03 23:43 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-04 16:55 ` Toshi Kani
2015-12-02 22:00 ` Dave Hansen
2015-12-02 22:03 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-02 22:09 ` Dave Hansen
2015-12-03 0:21 ` Toshi Kani [this message]
2015-12-02 23:33 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1449102105.9855.15.camel@hpe.com \
--to=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=mauricio.porto@hpe.com \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).