From: Laura Abbott <laura@labbott.name>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Laura Abbott <laura@labbott.name>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] mm: Add Kconfig option for slab sanitization
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:40:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450755641-7856-7-git-send-email-laura@labbott.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450755641-7856-1-git-send-email-laura@labbott.name>
The SL[AOU]B allocators all behave differently w.r.t. to what happen
an object is freed. CONFIG_SLAB_SANITIZATION introduces a common
mechanism to control what happens on free. When this option is
enabled, objects may be poisoned according to a combination of
slab_sanitization command line option and whether SLAB_NO_SANITIZE
is set on a cache.
All credit for the original work should be given to Brad Spengler and
the PaX Team.
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <laura@labbott.name>
---
init/Kconfig | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index 235c7a2..37857f3 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -1755,6 +1755,42 @@ config SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
which requires the taking of locks that may cause latency spikes.
Typically one would choose no for a realtime system.
+config SLAB_MEMORY_SANITIZE
+ bool "Sanitize all freed memory"
+ help
+ By saying Y here the kernel will erase slab objects as soon as they
+ are freed. This in turn reduces the lifetime of data
+ stored in them, making it less likely that sensitive information such
+ as passwords, cryptographic secrets, etc stay in memory for too long.
+
+ This is especially useful for programs whose runtime is short, long
+ lived processes and the kernel itself benefit from this as long as
+ they ensure timely freeing of memory that may hold sensitive
+ information.
+
+ A nice side effect of the sanitization of slab objects is the
+ reduction of possible info leaks caused by padding bytes within the
+ leaky structures. Use-after-free bugs for structures containing
+ pointers can also be detected as dereferencing the sanitized pointer
+ will generate an access violation.
+
+ The tradeoff is performance impact. The noticible impact can vary
+ and you are advised to test this feature on your expected workload
+ before deploying it
+
+ The slab sanitization feature excludes a few slab caches per default
+ for performance reasons. The level of sanitization can be adjusted
+ with the sanitize_slab commandline option:
+ sanitize_slab=off: No sanitization will occur
+ santiize_slab=slow: Sanitization occurs only on the slow path
+ for all but the excluded slabs
+ (relevant for SLUB allocator only)
+ sanitize_slab=partial: Sanitization occurs on all path for all
+ but the excluded slabs
+ sanitize_slab=full: All slabs are sanitize
+
+ If unsure, say Y here.
+
config MMAP_ALLOW_UNINITIALIZED
bool "Allow mmapped anonymous memory to be uninitialized"
depends on EXPERT && !MMU
--
2.5.0
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-22 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-22 3:40 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Sanitization of slabs based on grsecurity/PaX Laura Abbott
2015-12-22 3:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] mm/slab_common.c: Add common support for slab saniziation Laura Abbott
2015-12-22 20:48 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-01-06 0:17 ` Kees Cook
2016-01-06 2:06 ` Laura Abbott
2016-01-06 0:19 ` Kees Cook
2015-12-22 3:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] slub: Add support for sanitization Laura Abbott
2015-12-22 3:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] slab: " Laura Abbott
2015-12-22 3:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] slob: " Laura Abbott
2015-12-22 3:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] mm: Mark several cases as SLAB_NO_SANITIZE Laura Abbott
2016-01-06 0:21 ` Kees Cook
2016-01-06 2:11 ` Laura Abbott
2015-12-22 3:40 ` Laura Abbott [this message]
2015-12-22 9:33 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC][PATCH 6/7] mm: Add Kconfig option for slab sanitization Mathias Krause
2015-12-22 17:51 ` Laura Abbott
2015-12-22 18:37 ` Mathias Krause
2015-12-22 19:18 ` Laura Abbott
2015-12-22 20:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-22 20:06 ` Mathias Krause
2015-12-22 14:57 ` Dave Hansen
2015-12-22 16:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-22 17:22 ` Dave Hansen
2015-12-22 17:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-22 17:28 ` Dave Hansen
2015-12-22 18:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-22 18:19 ` Dave Hansen
2015-12-22 19:13 ` Laura Abbott
2015-12-22 19:32 ` Dave Hansen
2016-01-06 0:29 ` Kees Cook
2016-01-06 2:46 ` Laura Abbott
2015-12-22 3:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] lkdtm: Add READ_AFTER_FREE test Laura Abbott
2016-01-06 0:15 ` Kees Cook
2016-01-06 2:49 ` Laura Abbott
2015-12-22 16:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Sanitization of slabs based on grsecurity/PaX Christoph Lameter
2015-12-22 16:15 ` [kernel-hardening] " Dave Hansen
2015-12-22 16:38 ` Daniel Micay
2015-12-22 20:04 ` Laura Abbott
2016-01-06 0:09 ` Kees Cook
2016-01-06 3:17 ` Laura Abbott
2016-01-07 16:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-01-08 1:23 ` Laura Abbott
2016-01-08 14:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-01-14 3:49 ` Laura Abbott
2016-01-21 3:35 ` Laura Abbott
2016-01-21 15:39 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1450755641-7856-7-git-send-email-laura@labbott.name \
--to=laura@labbott.name \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).