linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laura Abbott <laura@labbott.name>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Laura Abbott <laura@labbott.name>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] mm: Add Kconfig option for slab sanitization
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:40:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450755641-7856-7-git-send-email-laura@labbott.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450755641-7856-1-git-send-email-laura@labbott.name>


The SL[AOU]B allocators all behave differently w.r.t. to what happen
an object is freed. CONFIG_SLAB_SANITIZATION introduces a common
mechanism to control what happens on free. When this option is
enabled, objects may be poisoned according to a combination of
slab_sanitization command line option and whether SLAB_NO_SANITIZE
is set on a cache.

All credit for the original work should be given to Brad Spengler and
the PaX Team.

Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <laura@labbott.name>
---
 init/Kconfig | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)

diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index 235c7a2..37857f3 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -1755,6 +1755,42 @@ config SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
 	  which requires the taking of locks that may cause latency spikes.
 	  Typically one would choose no for a realtime system.
 
+config SLAB_MEMORY_SANITIZE
+	bool "Sanitize all freed memory"
+	help
+	  By saying Y here the kernel will erase slab objects as soon as they
+	  are freed.  This in turn reduces the lifetime of data
+	  stored in them, making it less likely that sensitive information such
+	  as passwords, cryptographic secrets, etc stay in memory for too long.
+
+	  This is especially useful for programs whose runtime is short, long
+	  lived processes and the kernel itself benefit from this as long as
+	  they ensure timely freeing of memory that may hold sensitive
+	  information.
+
+	  A nice side effect of the sanitization of slab objects is the
+	  reduction of possible info leaks caused by padding bytes within the
+	  leaky structures.  Use-after-free bugs for structures containing
+	  pointers can also be detected as dereferencing the sanitized pointer
+	  will generate an access violation.
+
+	  The tradeoff is performance impact. The noticible impact can vary
+	  and you are advised to test this feature on your expected workload
+	  before deploying it
+
+	  The slab sanitization feature excludes a few slab caches per default
+	  for performance reasons. The level of sanitization can be adjusted
+	  with the sanitize_slab commandline option:
+		sanitize_slab=off: No sanitization will occur
+		santiize_slab=slow: Sanitization occurs only on the slow path
+		for all but the excluded slabs
+		(relevant for SLUB allocator only)
+		sanitize_slab=partial: Sanitization occurs on all path for all
+		but the excluded slabs
+		sanitize_slab=full: All slabs are sanitize
+
+	  If unsure, say Y here.
+
 config MMAP_ALLOW_UNINITIALIZED
 	bool "Allow mmapped anonymous memory to be uninitialized"
 	depends on EXPERT && !MMU
-- 
2.5.0

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-22  3:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-22  3:40 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Sanitization of slabs based on grsecurity/PaX Laura Abbott
2015-12-22  3:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] mm/slab_common.c: Add common support for slab saniziation Laura Abbott
2015-12-22 20:48   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-01-06  0:17     ` Kees Cook
2016-01-06  2:06       ` Laura Abbott
2016-01-06  0:19   ` Kees Cook
2015-12-22  3:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] slub: Add support for sanitization Laura Abbott
2015-12-22  3:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] slab: " Laura Abbott
2015-12-22  3:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] slob: " Laura Abbott
2015-12-22  3:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] mm: Mark several cases as SLAB_NO_SANITIZE Laura Abbott
2016-01-06  0:21   ` Kees Cook
2016-01-06  2:11     ` Laura Abbott
2015-12-22  3:40 ` Laura Abbott [this message]
2015-12-22  9:33   ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC][PATCH 6/7] mm: Add Kconfig option for slab sanitization Mathias Krause
2015-12-22 17:51     ` Laura Abbott
2015-12-22 18:37       ` Mathias Krause
2015-12-22 19:18         ` Laura Abbott
2015-12-22 20:01         ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-22 20:06           ` Mathias Krause
2015-12-22 14:57   ` Dave Hansen
2015-12-22 16:25     ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-22 17:22       ` Dave Hansen
2015-12-22 17:24         ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-22 17:28           ` Dave Hansen
2015-12-22 18:08             ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-22 18:19               ` Dave Hansen
2015-12-22 19:13                 ` Laura Abbott
2015-12-22 19:32                   ` Dave Hansen
2016-01-06  0:29                   ` Kees Cook
2016-01-06  2:46                     ` Laura Abbott
2015-12-22  3:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] lkdtm: Add READ_AFTER_FREE test Laura Abbott
2016-01-06  0:15   ` Kees Cook
2016-01-06  2:49     ` Laura Abbott
2015-12-22 16:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Sanitization of slabs based on grsecurity/PaX Christoph Lameter
2015-12-22 16:15   ` [kernel-hardening] " Dave Hansen
2015-12-22 16:38   ` Daniel Micay
2015-12-22 20:04   ` Laura Abbott
2016-01-06  0:09     ` Kees Cook
2016-01-06  3:17       ` Laura Abbott
2016-01-07 16:26         ` Christoph Lameter
2016-01-08  1:23           ` Laura Abbott
2016-01-08 14:07             ` Christoph Lameter
2016-01-14  3:49               ` Laura Abbott
2016-01-21  3:35                 ` Laura Abbott
2016-01-21 15:39                   ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1450755641-7856-7-git-send-email-laura@labbott.name \
    --to=laura@labbott.name \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).