From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f174.google.com (mail-pf0-f174.google.com [209.85.192.174]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC78B82F60 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:48:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf0-f174.google.com with SMTP id x3so237566398pfb.1 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 11:48:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com. [192.55.52.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hc1si9272707pac.16.2016.03.20.11.41.46 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 11:41:46 -0700 (PDT) From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: [PATCH 28/71] dlm: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:40:35 +0300 Message-Id: <1458499278-1516-29-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1458499278-1516-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> References: <1458499278-1516-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Linus Torvalds Cc: Christoph Lameter , Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Christine Caulfield , David Teigland PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> ; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Cc: Christine Caulfield Cc: David Teigland --- fs/dlm/lowcomms.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c index 00640e70ed7a..1ab012a27d9f 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c +++ b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ static int receive_from_sock(struct connection *con) con->rx_page = alloc_page(GFP_ATOMIC); if (con->rx_page == NULL) goto out_resched; - cbuf_init(&con->cb, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE); + cbuf_init(&con->cb, PAGE_SIZE); } /* @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ static int receive_from_sock(struct connection *con) * buffer and the start of the currently used section (cb.base) */ if (cbuf_data(&con->cb) >= con->cb.base) { - iov[0].iov_len = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - cbuf_data(&con->cb); + iov[0].iov_len = PAGE_SIZE - cbuf_data(&con->cb); iov[1].iov_len = con->cb.base; iov[1].iov_base = page_address(con->rx_page); nvec = 2; @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ static int receive_from_sock(struct connection *con) ret = dlm_process_incoming_buffer(con->nodeid, page_address(con->rx_page), con->cb.base, con->cb.len, - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE); + PAGE_SIZE); if (ret == -EBADMSG) { log_print("lowcomms: addr=%p, base=%u, len=%u, read=%d", page_address(con->rx_page), con->cb.base, @@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@ void *dlm_lowcomms_get_buffer(int nodeid, int len, gfp_t allocation, char **ppc) spin_lock(&con->writequeue_lock); e = list_entry(con->writequeue.prev, struct writequeue_entry, list); if ((&e->list == &con->writequeue) || - (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - e->end < len)) { + (PAGE_SIZE - e->end < len)) { e = NULL; } else { offset = e->end; -- 2.7.0 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org