From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f178.google.com (mail-pf0-f178.google.com [209.85.192.178]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A494B82F60 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:47:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf0-f178.google.com with SMTP id 4so106632054pfd.0 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 11:47:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com. [134.134.136.24]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qx12si13425508pab.169.2016.03.20.11.41.48 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 11:41:48 -0700 (PDT) From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: [PATCH 36/71] fscache: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:40:43 +0300 Message-Id: <1458499278-1516-37-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1458499278-1516-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> References: <1458499278-1516-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Linus Torvalds Cc: Christoph Lameter , Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Kirill A. Shutemov" , David Howells PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> ; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Cc: David Howells --- fs/fscache/page.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fscache/page.c b/fs/fscache/page.c index 6b35fc4860a0..3078b679fcd1 100644 --- a/fs/fscache/page.c +++ b/fs/fscache/page.c @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ try_again: wake_up_bit(&cookie->flags, 0); if (xpage) - page_cache_release(xpage); + put_page(xpage); __fscache_uncache_page(cookie, page); return true; @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static void fscache_end_page_write(struct fscache_object *object, } spin_unlock(&object->lock); if (xpage) - page_cache_release(xpage); + put_page(xpage); } /* @@ -884,7 +884,7 @@ void fscache_invalidate_writes(struct fscache_cookie *cookie) spin_unlock(&cookie->stores_lock); for (i = n - 1; i >= 0; i--) - page_cache_release(results[i]); + put_page(results[i]); } _leave(""); @@ -982,7 +982,7 @@ int __fscache_write_page(struct fscache_cookie *cookie, radix_tree_tag_set(&cookie->stores, page->index, FSCACHE_COOKIE_PENDING_TAG); - page_cache_get(page); + get_page(page); /* we only want one writer at a time, but we do need to queue new * writers after exclusive ops */ @@ -1026,7 +1026,7 @@ submit_failed: radix_tree_delete(&cookie->stores, page->index); spin_unlock(&cookie->stores_lock); wake_cookie = __fscache_unuse_cookie(cookie); - page_cache_release(page); + put_page(page); ret = -ENOBUFS; goto nobufs; -- 2.7.0 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org