From: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
To: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com" <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
"Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
"david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
"jack@suse.cz" <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] dax: use sb_issue_zerout instead of calling dax_clear_sectors
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 21:03:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1458939796.5501.8.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4iKK=1Nhz4QqEkhc4gum+UvUS4a=+Sza2zSa1Kyrth41w@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2016-03-25 at 11:47 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.c
> om> wrote:
> >
> > From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
> >
> > dax_clear_sectors() cannot handle poisoned blocks. These must be
> > zeroed using the BIO interface instead. Convert ext2 and XFS to
> > use
> > only sb_issue_zerout().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
> > [vishal: Also remove the dax_clear_sectors function entirely]
> > Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> > ---
> > fs/dax.c | 32 --------------------------------
> > fs/ext2/inode.c | 7 +++----
> > fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 9 ---------
> > include/linux/dax.h | 1 -
> > 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> > index bb7e9f8..a30481e 100644
> > --- a/fs/dax.c
> > +++ b/fs/dax.c
> > @@ -78,38 +78,6 @@ struct page *read_dax_sector(struct block_device
> > *bdev, sector_t n)
> > return page;
> > }
> >
> > -/*
> > - * dax_clear_sectors() is called from within transaction context
> > from XFS,
> > - * and hence this means the stack from this point must follow
> > GFP_NOFS
> > - * semantics for all operations.
> > - */
> > -int dax_clear_sectors(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t _sector,
> > long _size)
> > -{
> > - struct blk_dax_ctl dax = {
> > - .sector = _sector,
> > - .size = _size,
> > - };
> > -
> > - might_sleep();
> > - do {
> > - long count, sz;
> > -
> > - count = dax_map_atomic(bdev, &dax);
> > - if (count < 0)
> > - return count;
> > - sz = min_t(long, count, SZ_128K);
> > - clear_pmem(dax.addr, sz);
> > - dax.size -= sz;
> > - dax.sector += sz / 512;
> > - dax_unmap_atomic(bdev, &dax);
> > - cond_resched();
> > - } while (dax.size);
> > -
> > - wmb_pmem();
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_clear_sectors);
> What about the other unwritten extent conversions in the dax path?
> Shouldn't those be converted to block-layer zero-outs as well?
Could you point me to where these might be? I thought once we've
converted all the zeroout type callers (by removing dax_clear_sectors),
and fixed up dax_do_io to try a driver fallback, we've handled all the
media error cases in dax..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-25 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-24 23:17 [PATCH 0/5] dax: handling of media errors Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] block, dax: pass blk_dax_ctl through to drivers Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] dax: fallback from pmd to pte on error Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] dax: enable dax in the presence of known media errors (badblocks) Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:23 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-24 23:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] dax: use sb_issue_zerout instead of calling dax_clear_sectors Vishal Verma
2016-03-25 10:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-25 21:01 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-25 18:47 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-25 21:03 ` Verma, Vishal L [this message]
2016-03-25 21:20 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-28 20:01 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-28 23:34 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-29 18:57 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-29 19:37 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-30 7:49 ` Jan Kara
2016-04-01 19:17 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-04-04 12:09 ` Jan Kara
2016-03-24 23:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] dax: handle media errors in dax_do_io Vishal Verma
2016-03-25 10:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-25 20:59 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-25 21:42 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-25 22:36 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-26 16:53 ` hch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1458939796.5501.8.camel@intel.com \
--to=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).