From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ksm: introduce ksm_max_page_sharing per page deduplication limit
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 16:33:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459974829.28435.6.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447181081-30056-2-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 840 bytes --]
On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 19:44 +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Without a max deduplication limit for each KSM page, the list of the
> rmap_items associated to each stable_node can grow infinitely
> large.
>
> During the rmap walk each entry can take up to ~10usec to process
> because of IPIs for the TLB flushing (both for the primary MMU and
> the
> secondary MMUs with the MMU notifier). With only 16GB of address
> space
> shared in the same KSM page, that would amount to dozens of seconds
> of
> kernel runtime.
Silly question, but could we fix this problem
by building up a bitmask of all CPUs that have
a page-with-high-mapcount mapped, and simply
send out a global TLB flush to those CPUs once
we have changed the page tables, instead of
sending out IPIs at every page table change?
--
All rights reversed
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-06 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-10 18:44 RFC [PATCH 0/1] ksm: introduce ksm_max_page_sharing per page deduplication limit Andrea Arcangeli
2015-11-10 18:44 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Andrea Arcangeli
2015-12-09 16:19 ` Petr Holasek
2015-12-09 17:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2015-12-09 18:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2015-12-10 16:06 ` Petr Holasek
2015-12-11 0:31 ` Andrew Morton
2016-01-14 23:36 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-01-16 17:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-01-16 18:00 ` Arjan van de Ven
2016-01-18 8:14 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-01-18 14:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2016-01-18 9:10 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-01-18 9:45 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-01-18 17:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-03-17 21:34 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-03-17 21:50 ` Andrew Morton
2016-03-18 16:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-01-18 11:01 ` Mel Gorman
2016-01-18 22:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-01-19 10:43 ` Mel Gorman
2016-04-06 20:33 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2016-04-06 22:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-09-21 15:12 ` Gavin Guo
2016-09-21 15:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-09-22 10:48 ` Gavin Guo
2016-10-28 6:26 ` Gavin Guo
2016-10-28 18:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2017-04-20 3:14 ` Gavin Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1459974829.28435.6.camel@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pholasek@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).