* Re: [Bug 107771] New: Single process tries to use more than 1/2 physical RAM, OS starts thrashing [not found] <bug-107771-27@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> @ 2016-04-15 19:15 ` Andrew Morton 2016-04-15 19:31 ` Rik van Riel 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2016-04-15 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-mm Cc: bugzilla-daemon, Rik van Riel, Johannes Weiner, Mel Gorman, theosib (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web interface). This is ... interesting. On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:46:35 +0000 bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107771 > > Bug ID: 107771 > Summary: Single process tries to use more than 1/2 physical > RAM, OS starts thrashing > Product: Memory Management > Version: 2.5 > Kernel Version: 4.3.0-040300-generic (Ubuntu) > Hardware: All > OS: Linux > Tree: Mainline > Status: NEW > Severity: normal > Priority: P1 > Component: Page Allocator > Assignee: akpm@linux-foundation.org > Reporter: theosib@gmail.com > Regression: No > > I have a 24-core (48 thread) system with 64GB of RAM. > > When I run multiple processes, I can use all of physical RAM before swapping > starts. However, if I'm running only a *single* process, the system will start > swapping after I've exceeded only 1/2 of available physical RAM. Only after > swap fills does it start using more of the physical RAM. > > I can't find any ulimit settings or anything else that would cause this to > happen intentionally. > > I had originally filed this against Ubuntu, but I'm now running a more recent > kernel, and the problem persists, so I think it's more appropriate to file > here. There are some logs that they had me collect, so if you want to see > them, the are here: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1513673 > > I don't recall this problem happening with older kernels (whatever came with > Ubuntu 15.04), although I may just not have noticed. By swapping early, I'm > limited by the speed of my SSD, which is moving only about 20MB/sec in each > direction, and that makes what I'm running take 10 times as long to complete. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are the assignee for the bug. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 107771] New: Single process tries to use more than 1/2 physical RAM, OS starts thrashing 2016-04-15 19:15 ` [Bug 107771] New: Single process tries to use more than 1/2 physical RAM, OS starts thrashing Andrew Morton @ 2016-04-15 19:31 ` Rik van Riel 2016-04-17 18:53 ` Michal Hocko 2016-04-22 22:44 ` Timothy Normand Miller 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Rik van Riel @ 2016-04-15 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton, linux-mm Cc: bugzilla-daemon, Johannes Weiner, Mel Gorman, theosib [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2608 bytes --] On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 12:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via > the > bugzilla web interface). > > This is ... interesting. First things first. What is the value of /proc/sys/vm/zone_reclaim? I am assuming this is a two socket system, with two 12-core CPUs. Am I right? > On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:46:35 +0000 bugzilla- > daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > > > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107771 > > > > Bug ID: 107771 > > Summary: Single process tries to use more than 1/2 > > physical > > RAM, OS starts thrashing > > Product: Memory Management > > Version: 2.5 > > Kernel Version: 4.3.0-040300-generic (Ubuntu) > > Hardware: All > > OS: Linux > > Tree: Mainline > > Status: NEW > > Severity: normal > > Priority: P1 > > Component: Page Allocator > > Assignee: akpm@linux-foundation.org > > Reporter: theosib@gmail.com > > Regression: No > > > > I have a 24-core (48 thread) system with 64GB of RAM. > > > > When I run multiple processes, I can use all of physical RAM before > > swapping > > starts. However, if I'm running only a *single* process, the > > system will start > > swapping after I've exceeded only 1/2 of available physical > > RAM. Only after > > swap fills does it start using more of the physical RAM. > > > > I can't find any ulimit settings or anything else that would cause > > this to > > happen intentionally. > > > > I had originally filed this against Ubuntu, but I'm now running a > > more recent > > kernel, and the problem persists, so I think it's more appropriate > > to file > > here. There are some logs that they had me collect, so if you want > > to see > > them, the are here: > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1513673 > > > > I don't recall this problem happening with older kernels (whatever > > came with > > Ubuntu 15.04), although I may just not have noticed. By swapping > > early, I'm > > limited by the speed of my SSD, which is moving only about 20MB/sec > > in each > > direction, and that makes what I'm running take 10 times as long to > > complete. > > -- All Rights Reversed. [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 107771] New: Single process tries to use more than 1/2 physical RAM, OS starts thrashing 2016-04-15 19:31 ` Rik van Riel @ 2016-04-17 18:53 ` Michal Hocko 2016-04-22 23:01 ` Timothy Normand Miller 2016-04-22 22:44 ` Timothy Normand Miller 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Michal Hocko @ 2016-04-17 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: theosib Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-mm, bugzilla-daemon, Johannes Weiner, Mel Gorman, Rik van Riel On Fri 15-04-16 15:31:22, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 12:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via > > the > > bugzilla web interface). > > > > This is ... interesting. > > First things first. What is the value of > /proc/sys/vm/zone_reclaim? Also snapshots of /proc/vmstat taken every 1s or so while you see the trashing would be helpful. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 107771] New: Single process tries to use more than 1/2 physical RAM, OS starts thrashing 2016-04-17 18:53 ` Michal Hocko @ 2016-04-22 23:01 ` Timothy Normand Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Timothy Normand Miller @ 2016-04-22 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michal Hocko Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-mm, bugzilla-daemon, Johannes Weiner, Mel Gorman, Rik van Riel On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote: > On Fri 15-04-16 15:31:22, Rik van Riel wrote: >> On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 12:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> > (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via >> > the >> > bugzilla web interface). >> > >> > This is ... interesting. >> >> First things first. What is the value of >> /proc/sys/vm/zone_reclaim? > > Also snapshots of /proc/vmstat taken every 1s or so while you see the > trashing would be helpful. It's been so long since I reported this bug that I don't recall exactly what I was doing. I think I was running Synopsys. I tried artificially reproducing this by just allocating a huge amount of memory and touching all the pages, but the problem didn't manifest. I wonder if Synopsys was allocating pages it didn't touch or mmaping files or some other weird thing. > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs -- Timothy Normand Miller, PhD Assistant Professor of Computer Science, Binghamton University http://www.cs.binghamton.edu/~millerti/ Open Graphics Project -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 107771] New: Single process tries to use more than 1/2 physical RAM, OS starts thrashing 2016-04-15 19:31 ` Rik van Riel 2016-04-17 18:53 ` Michal Hocko @ 2016-04-22 22:44 ` Timothy Normand Miller 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Timothy Normand Miller @ 2016-04-22 22:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rik van Riel Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-mm, bugzilla-daemon, Johannes Weiner, Mel Gorman On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 12:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via >> the >> bugzilla web interface). >> >> This is ... interesting. > > First things first. What is the value of > /proc/sys/vm/zone_reclaim? There is no such thing on this system. However: $ cat /proc/sys/vm/zone_reclaim_mode 0 > > I am assuming this is a two socket system, > with two 12-core CPUs. Am I right? Yes. > >> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:46:35 +0000 bugzilla- >> daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: >> >> > >> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107771 >> > >> > Bug ID: 107771 >> > Summary: Single process tries to use more than 1/2 >> > physical >> > RAM, OS starts thrashing >> > Product: Memory Management >> > Version: 2.5 >> > Kernel Version: 4.3.0-040300-generic (Ubuntu) >> > Hardware: All >> > OS: Linux >> > Tree: Mainline >> > Status: NEW >> > Severity: normal >> > Priority: P1 >> > Component: Page Allocator >> > Assignee: akpm@linux-foundation.org >> > Reporter: theosib@gmail.com >> > Regression: No >> > >> > I have a 24-core (48 thread) system with 64GB of RAM. >> > >> > When I run multiple processes, I can use all of physical RAM before >> > swapping >> > starts. However, if I'm running only a *single* process, the >> > system will start >> > swapping after I've exceeded only 1/2 of available physical >> > RAM. Only after >> > swap fills does it start using more of the physical RAM. >> > >> > I can't find any ulimit settings or anything else that would cause >> > this to >> > happen intentionally. >> > >> > I had originally filed this against Ubuntu, but I'm now running a >> > more recent >> > kernel, and the problem persists, so I think it's more appropriate >> > to file >> > here. There are some logs that they had me collect, so if you want >> > to see >> > them, the are here: >> > >> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1513673 >> > >> > I don't recall this problem happening with older kernels (whatever >> > came with >> > Ubuntu 15.04), although I may just not have noticed. By swapping >> > early, I'm >> > limited by the speed of my SSD, which is moving only about 20MB/sec >> > in each >> > direction, and that makes what I'm running take 10 times as long to >> > complete. >> > > -- > All Rights Reversed. > -- Timothy Normand Miller, PhD Assistant Professor of Computer Science, Binghamton University http://www.cs.binghamton.edu/~millerti/ Open Graphics Project -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-04-22 23:01 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <bug-107771-27@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> 2016-04-15 19:15 ` [Bug 107771] New: Single process tries to use more than 1/2 physical RAM, OS starts thrashing Andrew Morton 2016-04-15 19:31 ` Rik van Riel 2016-04-17 18:53 ` Michal Hocko 2016-04-22 23:01 ` Timothy Normand Miller 2016-04-22 22:44 ` Timothy Normand Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).