From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more for !CONFIG_COMPACTION
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 13:14:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1463051677-29418-3-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463051677-29418-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org>
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Joonsoo has reported that he is able to trigger OOM for !costly high
order requests (heavy fork() workload close the OOM) with the new
oom detection rework. This is because we rely only on should_reclaim_retry
when the compaction is disabled and it only checks watermarks for the
requested order and so we might trigger OOM when there is a lot of free
memory.
It is not very clear what are the usual workloads when the compaction
is disabled. Relying on high order allocations heavily without any
mechanism to create those orders except for unbound amount of reclaim is
certainly not a good idea.
To prevent from potential regressions let's help this configuration
some. We have to sacrifice the determinsm though because there simply is
none here possible. should_compact_retry implementation for
!CONFIG_COMPACTION, which was empty so far, will do watermark check
for order-0 on all eligible zones. This will cause retrying until either
the reclaim cannot make any further progress or all the zones are
depleted even for order-0 pages. This means that the number of retries
is basically unbounded for !costly orders but that was the case before
the rework as well so this shouldn't regress.
Reported-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 620ec002aea2..7e2defbfe55b 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3310,6 +3310,24 @@ should_compact_retry(struct alloc_context *ac, unsigned int order, int alloc_fla
enum migrate_mode *migrate_mode,
int compaction_retries)
{
+ struct zone *zone;
+ struct zoneref *z;
+
+ if (!order || order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * There are setups with compaction disabled which would prefer to loop
+ * inside the allocator rather than hit the oom killer prematurely. Let's
+ * give them a good hope and keep retrying while the order-0 watermarks
+ * are OK.
+ */
+ for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx,
+ ac->nodemask) {
+ if(zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, min_wmark_pages(zone),
+ ac_classzone_idx(ac), alloc_flags))
+ return true;
+ }
return false;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_COMPACTION */
--
2.8.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-12 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-12 11:14 [PATCH 0/2] oom detection fixups Michal Hocko
2016-05-12 11:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmotm: mm-oom-rework-oom-detection-fix Michal Hocko
2016-05-13 3:59 ` Hillf Danton
2016-05-12 11:14 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-05-13 4:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more for !CONFIG_COMPACTION Hillf Danton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1463051677-29418-3-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).