From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 6/6] oom, oom_reaper: allow to reap mm shared by the kthreads
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:26:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467365190-24640-7-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467365190-24640-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org>
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
oom reaper was skipped for an mm which is shared with the kernel thread
(aka use_mm()). The primary concern was that such a kthread might want
to read from the userspace memory and see zero page as a result of the
oom reaper action. This seems to be overly conservative because none of
the current use_mm() users need to do copy_from_user or get_user. aio
code used to rely on copy_from_user but this is long gone along with
use_mm() usage in fs/aio.c.
We currently have only 3 users in the kernel:
- ffs_user_copy_worker, ep_user_copy_worker only do copy_to_iter()
- vhost_worker needs to copy from userspace but it relies on the
safe __get_user_mm, copy_from_user_mm resp. copy_from_iter_mm
Add a note to use_mm about the copy_from_user risk and allow the oom
killer to invoke the oom_reaper for mms shared with kthreads. This will
practically cause all the sane use cases to be reapable.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
mm/mmu_context.c | 6 ++++++
mm/oom_kill.c | 14 +++++++-------
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mmu_context.c b/mm/mmu_context.c
index f802c2d216a7..61a7a90250be 100644
--- a/mm/mmu_context.c
+++ b/mm/mmu_context.c
@@ -16,6 +16,12 @@
* mm context.
* (Note: this routine is intended to be called only
* from a kernel thread context)
+ *
+ * Do not use copy_from_user/__get_user from this context
+ * and use the safe copy_from_user_mm/__get_user_mm because
+ * the address space might got reclaimed behind the back by
+ * the oom_reaper so an unexpected zero page might be
+ * encountered.
*/
void use_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 38a0cd32c01b..d5ea082a7360 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -914,13 +914,7 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
continue;
if (same_thread_group(p, victim))
continue;
- if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) || is_global_init(p)) {
- /*
- * We cannot use oom_reaper for the mm shared by this
- * process because it wouldn't get killed and so the
- * memory might be still used. Hide the mm from the oom
- * killer to guarantee OOM forward progress.
- */
+ if (is_global_init(p)) {
can_oom_reap = false;
set_bit(MMF_OOM_REAPED, &mm->flags);
pr_info("oom killer %d (%s) has mm pinned by %d (%s)\n",
@@ -928,6 +922,12 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
task_pid_nr(p), p->comm);
continue;
}
+ /*
+ * No use_mm() user needs to read from the userspace so we are
+ * ok to reap it.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
+ continue;
do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, true);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
--
2.8.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-01 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-01 9:26 [RFC PATCH 0/6] fortify oom killer even more Michal Hocko
2016-07-01 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] oom: keep mm of the killed task available Michal Hocko
2016-07-03 2:45 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-07 8:24 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-07 11:48 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-07 13:32 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-01 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] oom, suspend: fix oom_killer_disable vs. pm suspend properly Michal Hocko
2016-07-01 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] exit, oom: postpone exit_oom_victim to later Michal Hocko
2016-07-01 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] oom, oom_reaper: consider mmget_not_zero as a failure Michal Hocko
2016-07-01 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] vhost, mm: make sure that oom_reaper doesn't reap memory read by vhost Michal Hocko
2016-07-03 13:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-03 14:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-07-03 15:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-03 15:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-07-03 16:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-03 21:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-07-07 8:28 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-07 15:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-07-08 12:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-11 14:14 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-12 14:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-07 8:42 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-07 16:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-07-07 8:39 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-22 11:09 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-01 9:26 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1467365190-24640-7-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).