On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 13:57 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:00:43PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, 2016-08-29 at 15:31 -0600, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2016-08-29 at 23:48 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > 
 :
> > Looking further, these shmem_huge handlings only check pre-
> > conditions.  So, we should 
> > be able to make shmem_get_unmapped_area() as a wrapper, which
> > checks such shmem-specific conitions, and
> > then call __thp_get_unmapped_area() for the actual work.  All DAX-
> > specific checks are performed in thp_get_unmapped_area() as well.
> >  We can make  __thp_get_unmapped_area() as a common function.
> > 
> > I'd prefer to make such change as a separate item,
> 
> Do you have plan to submit such change?

Yes, I will submit the change once I finish testing.

Thanks,
-ToshiN‹§²æìr¸›zǧu©ž²Æ {­†éì¹»®&Þ–)îÆi¢žØ^n‡r¶‰šŽŠÝ¢j$½§$¢¸¢¹¨­è§~Š'.)îÄÃ,yèm¶ŸÿÃ%Š{±šj+ƒðèž×¦j)Z†·Ÿ