From: Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@arm.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com
Cc: n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com, mhocko@suse.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com, mike.kravetz@oracle.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, will.deacon@arm.com, steve.capper@arm.com,
kaly.xin@arm.com, nd@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, vbabka@suze.cz,
Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] mm: fix the "counter.sh" failure for libhugetlbfs
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 17:17:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1480929431-22348-1-git-send-email-shijie.huang@arm.com> (raw)
(1) Background
For the arm64, the hugetlb page size can be 32M (PMD + Contiguous bit).
In the 4K page environment, the max page order is 10 (max_order - 1),
so 32M page is the gigantic page.
The arm64 MMU supports a Contiguous bit which is a hint that the TTE
is one of a set of contiguous entries which can be cached in a single
TLB entry. Please refer to the arm64v8 mannul :
DDI0487A_f_armv8_arm.pdf (in page D4-1811)
(2) The bug
After I tested the libhugetlbfs, I found the test case "counter.sh"
will fail with the gigantic page (32M page in arm64 board).
The counter.sh is just a wrapper for counter.c.
You can find them in:
https://github.com/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs/blob/master/tests/counters.c
https://github.com/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs/blob/master/tests/counters.sh
The error log shows below:
----------------------------------------------------------
...........................................
LD_PRELOAD=libhugetlbfs.so shmoverride_unlinked (32M: 64): PASS
LD_PRELOAD=libhugetlbfs.so HUGETLB_SHM=yes shmoverride_unlinked (32M: 64): PASS
quota.sh (32M: 64): PASS
counters.sh (32M: 64): FAIL mmap failed: Invalid argument
********** TEST SUMMARY
* 32M
* 32-bit 64-bit
* Total testcases: 0 87
* Skipped: 0 0
* PASS: 0 86
* FAIL: 0 1
* Killed by signal: 0 0
* Bad configuration: 0 0
* Expected FAIL: 0 0
* Unexpected PASS: 0 0
* Strange test result: 0 0
**********
----------------------------------------------------------
The failure is caused by:
1) kernel fails to allocate a gigantic page for the surplus case.
And the gather_surplus_pages() will return NULL in the end.
2) The condition checks for some functions are wrong:
return_unused_surplus_pages()
nr_overcommit_hugepages_store()
hugetlb_overcommit_handler()
This patch set adds support for gigantic surplus hugetlb pages,
allowing the counter.sh unit test to pass.
Test this patch set with Juno-r1 board.
v2 -- > v3:
1.) In patch 2, change argument "no_init" to "do_prep"
2.) In patch 3, also change alloc_fresh_huge_page().
In the v2, this patch only changes the alloc_fresh_gigantic_page().
3.) Merge old patch #4,#5 into the last one.
4.) Follow Babka's suggestion, do the NULL check for @mask.
5.) others.
v1 -- > v2:
1.) fix the compiler error in X86.
2.) add new patches for NUMA.
The patch #2 ~ #5 are new patches.
Huang Shijie (4):
mm: hugetlb: rename some allocation functions
mm: hugetlb: add a new parameter for some functions
mm: hugetlb: change the return type for some functions
mm: hugetlb: support gigantic surplus pages
include/linux/mempolicy.h | 8 +++
mm/hugetlb.c | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
mm/mempolicy.c | 44 ++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
--
2.5.5
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2016-12-05 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-05 9:17 Huang Shijie [this message]
2016-12-05 9:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mm: hugetlb: rename some allocation functions Huang Shijie
2016-12-05 9:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm: hugetlb: add a new parameter for some functions Huang Shijie
2016-12-05 9:17 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: hugetlb: change the return type " Huang Shijie
2016-12-05 9:17 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] mm: hugetlb: support gigantic surplus pages Huang Shijie
2016-12-05 9:31 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] mm: fix the "counter.sh" failure for libhugetlbfs Michal Hocko
2016-12-06 10:03 ` Huang Shijie
2016-12-07 15:02 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-08 9:36 ` Huang Shijie
2016-12-08 9:52 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-09 9:58 ` Huang Shijie
2016-12-07 8:46 ` Huang Shijie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1480929431-22348-1-git-send-email-shijie.huang@arm.com \
--to=shijie.huang@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kaly.xin@arm.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
--cc=vbabka@suze.cz \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).