Re: [PATCH 4.4 05/48] mm: fix devm_memremap_pages crash, use mem_hotplug_{begin, done}

[Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1747 bytes --]

On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 11:46 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> ------------------
> 
> From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> 
> commit f931ab479dd24cf7a2c6e2df19778406892591fb upstream.
> 
> Both arch_add_memory() and arch_remove_memory() expect a single threaded
> context.
[...]
> The result is that two threads calling devm_memremap_pages()
> simultaneously can end up colliding on pgd initialization.  This leads
> to crash signatures like the following where the loser of the race
> initializes the wrong pgd entry:
[...]
> Hold the standard memory hotplug mutex over calls to
> arch_{add,remove}_memory().
[...]

This is not a sufficient fix, because memory_hotplug.c still assumes
there's only one 'writer':

void put_online_mems(void)
{
	...
        if (!--mem_hotplug.refcount && unlikely(mem_hotplug.active_writer))
                wake_up_process(mem_hotplug.active_writer);
        ...
}

void mem_hotplug_begin(void)
{
        mem_hotplug.active_writer = current;

        memhp_lock_acquire();
        for (;;) {
                mutex_lock(&mem_hotplug.lock);
                if (likely(!mem_hotplug.refcount))
                        break;
                __set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
                mutex_unlock(&mem_hotplug.lock);
                schedule();
        }
}

With multiple writers, one or more of them may hang or
{get,put}_online_mems() may mess up the hotplug reference count.

Is there a good reason that memory_hotplug.c isn't using an rwsem?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
All the simple programs have been written, and all the good names
taken.


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]