From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
kernel-team@lge.com, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/10] mm: make rmap_walk void function
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:24:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1489555493-14659-9-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1489555493-14659-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org>
There is no user of return value from rmap_walk friend so this
patch makes them void function.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/ksm.h | 5 ++---
include/linux/rmap.h | 4 ++--
mm/ksm.c | 16 ++++++----------
mm/rmap.c | 32 +++++++++++++-------------------
4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/ksm.h b/include/linux/ksm.h
index e1cfda4..78b44a0 100644
--- a/include/linux/ksm.h
+++ b/include/linux/ksm.h
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static inline void set_page_stable_node(struct page *page,
struct page *ksm_might_need_to_copy(struct page *page,
struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address);
-int rmap_walk_ksm(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc);
+void rmap_walk_ksm(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc);
void ksm_migrate_page(struct page *newpage, struct page *oldpage);
#else /* !CONFIG_KSM */
@@ -94,10 +94,9 @@ static inline int page_referenced_ksm(struct page *page,
return 0;
}
-static inline int rmap_walk_ksm(struct page *page,
+static inline void rmap_walk_ksm(struct page *page,
struct rmap_walk_control *rwc)
{
- return 0;
}
static inline void ksm_migrate_page(struct page *newpage, struct page *oldpage)
diff --git a/include/linux/rmap.h b/include/linux/rmap.h
index 6028c38..1d7d457c 100644
--- a/include/linux/rmap.h
+++ b/include/linux/rmap.h
@@ -264,8 +264,8 @@ struct rmap_walk_control {
bool (*invalid_vma)(struct vm_area_struct *vma, void *arg);
};
-int rmap_walk(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc);
-int rmap_walk_locked(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc);
+void rmap_walk(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc);
+void rmap_walk_locked(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc);
#else /* !CONFIG_MMU */
diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index 19b4f2d..6edffb9 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -1933,11 +1933,10 @@ struct page *ksm_might_need_to_copy(struct page *page,
return new_page;
}
-int rmap_walk_ksm(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc)
+void rmap_walk_ksm(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc)
{
struct stable_node *stable_node;
struct rmap_item *rmap_item;
- int ret = SWAP_AGAIN;
int search_new_forks = 0;
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageKsm(page), page);
@@ -1950,7 +1949,7 @@ int rmap_walk_ksm(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc)
stable_node = page_stable_node(page);
if (!stable_node)
- return ret;
+ return;
again:
hlist_for_each_entry(rmap_item, &stable_node->hlist, hlist) {
struct anon_vma *anon_vma = rmap_item->anon_vma;
@@ -1978,23 +1977,20 @@ int rmap_walk_ksm(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc)
if (rwc->invalid_vma && rwc->invalid_vma(vma, rwc->arg))
continue;
- ret = rwc->rmap_one(page, vma,
- rmap_item->address, rwc->arg);
- if (ret != SWAP_AGAIN) {
+ if (SWAP_AGAIN != rwc->rmap_one(page, vma,
+ rmap_item->address, rwc->arg)) {
anon_vma_unlock_read(anon_vma);
- goto out;
+ return;
}
if (rwc->done && rwc->done(page)) {
anon_vma_unlock_read(anon_vma);
- goto out;
+ return;
}
}
anon_vma_unlock_read(anon_vma);
}
if (!search_new_forks++)
goto again;
-out:
- return ret;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index 04d5355..987b0d2 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1603,13 +1603,12 @@ static struct anon_vma *rmap_walk_anon_lock(struct page *page,
* vm_flags for that VMA. That should be OK, because that vma shouldn't be
* LOCKED.
*/
-static int rmap_walk_anon(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc,
+static void rmap_walk_anon(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc,
bool locked)
{
struct anon_vma *anon_vma;
pgoff_t pgoff_start, pgoff_end;
struct anon_vma_chain *avc;
- int ret = SWAP_AGAIN;
if (locked) {
anon_vma = page_anon_vma(page);
@@ -1619,7 +1618,7 @@ static int rmap_walk_anon(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc,
anon_vma = rmap_walk_anon_lock(page, rwc);
}
if (!anon_vma)
- return ret;
+ return;
pgoff_start = page_to_pgoff(page);
pgoff_end = pgoff_start + hpage_nr_pages(page) - 1;
@@ -1633,8 +1632,7 @@ static int rmap_walk_anon(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc,
if (rwc->invalid_vma && rwc->invalid_vma(vma, rwc->arg))
continue;
- ret = rwc->rmap_one(page, vma, address, rwc->arg);
- if (ret != SWAP_AGAIN)
+ if (SWAP_AGAIN != rwc->rmap_one(page, vma, address, rwc->arg))
break;
if (rwc->done && rwc->done(page))
break;
@@ -1642,7 +1640,6 @@ static int rmap_walk_anon(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc,
if (!locked)
anon_vma_unlock_read(anon_vma);
- return ret;
}
/*
@@ -1658,13 +1655,12 @@ static int rmap_walk_anon(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc,
* vm_flags for that VMA. That should be OK, because that vma shouldn't be
* LOCKED.
*/
-static int rmap_walk_file(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc,
+static void rmap_walk_file(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc,
bool locked)
{
struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
pgoff_t pgoff_start, pgoff_end;
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
- int ret = SWAP_AGAIN;
/*
* The page lock not only makes sure that page->mapping cannot
@@ -1675,7 +1671,7 @@ static int rmap_walk_file(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc,
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
if (!mapping)
- return ret;
+ return;
pgoff_start = page_to_pgoff(page);
pgoff_end = pgoff_start + hpage_nr_pages(page) - 1;
@@ -1690,8 +1686,7 @@ static int rmap_walk_file(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc,
if (rwc->invalid_vma && rwc->invalid_vma(vma, rwc->arg))
continue;
- ret = rwc->rmap_one(page, vma, address, rwc->arg);
- if (ret != SWAP_AGAIN)
+ if (SWAP_AGAIN != rwc->rmap_one(page, vma, address, rwc->arg))
goto done;
if (rwc->done && rwc->done(page))
goto done;
@@ -1700,28 +1695,27 @@ static int rmap_walk_file(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc,
done:
if (!locked)
i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
- return ret;
}
-int rmap_walk(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc)
+void rmap_walk(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc)
{
if (unlikely(PageKsm(page)))
- return rmap_walk_ksm(page, rwc);
+ rmap_walk_ksm(page, rwc);
else if (PageAnon(page))
- return rmap_walk_anon(page, rwc, false);
+ rmap_walk_anon(page, rwc, false);
else
- return rmap_walk_file(page, rwc, false);
+ rmap_walk_file(page, rwc, false);
}
/* Like rmap_walk, but caller holds relevant rmap lock */
-int rmap_walk_locked(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc)
+void rmap_walk_locked(struct page *page, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc)
{
/* no ksm support for now */
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageKsm(page), page);
if (PageAnon(page))
- return rmap_walk_anon(page, rwc, true);
+ rmap_walk_anon(page, rwc, true);
else
- return rmap_walk_file(page, rwc, true);
+ rmap_walk_file(page, rwc, true);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
--
2.7.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-15 5:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-15 5:24 [PATCH v2 00/10] make try_to_unmap simple Minchan Kim
2017-03-15 5:24 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] mm: remove unncessary ret in page_referenced Minchan Kim
2017-03-15 5:24 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] mm: remove SWAP_DIRTY in ttu Minchan Kim
2017-03-15 5:24 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] mm: remove SWAP_MLOCK check for SWAP_SUCCESS " Minchan Kim
2017-03-15 5:24 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] mm: make the try_to_munlock void function Minchan Kim
2017-03-15 7:31 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-08 3:18 ` alexander.levin
2017-04-11 2:56 ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-15 5:24 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] mm: remove SWAP_MLOCK in ttu Minchan Kim
2017-03-15 5:24 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] mm: remove SWAP_AGAIN " Minchan Kim
2017-03-15 5:24 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] mm: make ttu's return boolean Minchan Kim
2017-03-15 5:24 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2017-03-15 5:24 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] mm: make rmap_one boolean function Minchan Kim
2017-03-15 5:24 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] mm: remove SWAP_[SUCCESS|AGAIN|FAIL] Minchan Kim
2017-03-16 4:40 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-16 5:33 ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-16 5:44 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-16 5:51 ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-16 5:57 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-16 18:54 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1489555493-14659-9-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).