From: CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: avagin@gmail.com, Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: check zone->all_unreclaimable in all_unreclaimable()
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 04:47:46 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491537913.283996.1304930866703.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110509155612.1648.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
----- Original Message -----
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > On 03/05/2011 06:20 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 02:44:16PM +0300, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> > > >> Check zone->all_unreclaimable in all_unreclaimable(), otherwise
> > > >> the
> > > >> kernel may hang up, because shrink_zones() will do nothing, but
> > > >> all_unreclaimable() will say, that zone has reclaimable pages.
> > > >>
> > > >> do_try_to_free_pages()
> > > >> shrink_zones()
> > > >> for_each_zone
> > > >> if (zone->all_unreclaimable)
> > > >> continue
> > > >> if !all_unreclaimable(zonelist, sc)
> > > >> return 1
> > > >>
> > > >> __alloc_pages_slowpath()
> > > >> retry:
> > > >> did_some_progress = do_try_to_free_pages(page)
> > > >> ...
> > > >> if (!page&& did_some_progress)
> > > >> retry;
> > > >>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin<avagin@openvz.org>
> > > >> ---
> > > >> mm/vmscan.c | 2 ++
> > > >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > > >>
> > > >> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > > >> index 6771ea7..1c056f7 100644
> > > >> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > > >> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > > >> @@ -2002,6 +2002,8 @@ static bool all_unreclaimable(struct
> > > >> zonelist
> > > >> *zonelist,
> > > >>
> > > >> for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
> > > >> gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
> > > >> + if (zone->all_unreclaimable)
> > > >> + continue;
> > > >> if (!populated_zone(zone))
> > > >> continue;
> > > >> if (!cpuset_zone_allowed_hardwall(zone, GFP_KERNEL))
> > > >
> > > > zone_reclaimable checks it. Isn't it enough?
> > > I sent one more patch [PATCH] mm: skip zombie in OOM-killer.
> > > This two patches are enough.
> > > > Does the hang up really happen or see it by code review?
> > > Yes. You can reproduce it for help the attached python program.
> > > It's
> > > not
> > > very clever:)
> > > It make the following actions in loop:
> > > 1. fork
> > > 2. mmap
> > > 3. touch memory
> > > 4. read memory
> > > 5. munmmap
> > >
> > > >> --
> > > >> 1.7.1
> > I have tested this for the latest mainline kernel using the
> > reproducer
> > attached, the system just hung or deadlock after oom. The whole oom
> > trace is here.
> > http://people.redhat.com/qcai/oom.log
> >
> > Did I miss anything?
>
> Can you please try commit 929bea7c714220fc76ce3f75bef9056477c28e74?
As I have mentioned that I have tested the latest mainline which have
already included that fix. Also, does this problem only for x86? The
testing was done using x86_64. Not sure if that would be a problem.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-09 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-05 11:44 [PATCH] mm: check zone->all_unreclaimable in all_unreclaimable() Andrey Vagin
2011-03-05 15:20 ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-05 15:34 ` Andrew Vagin
2011-03-05 15:53 ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-05 16:41 ` Andrew Vagin
2011-03-05 17:07 ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-07 21:58 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-07 23:45 ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-09 5:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-09 5:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-10 6:58 ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-10 23:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-11 0:18 ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-11 6:08 ` avagin
2011-03-14 1:03 ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-08 0:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-08 3:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-08 19:02 ` avagin
2011-03-09 5:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-09 6:17 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-10 14:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-08 8:12 ` Andrew Vagin
2011-03-09 6:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-04 1:38 ` CAI Qian
2011-05-09 6:54 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-09 8:47 ` CAI Qian [this message]
2011-05-09 9:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-10 8:11 ` OOM Killer don't works at all if the system have >gigabytes memory (was Re: [PATCH] mm: check zone->all_unreclaimable in all_unreclaimable()) KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-10 8:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] oom: improve dump_tasks() show items KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-10 23:29 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-13 10:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-10 8:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] oom: kill younger process first KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-10 23:31 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-13 10:15 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-11 23:33 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-12 0:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-12 1:30 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-12 1:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-12 2:23 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-12 3:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-12 4:17 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-12 14:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-13 10:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-10 8:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] oom: oom-killer don't use permillage of system-ram internally KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-10 23:40 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-13 10:30 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-10 8:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] oom: don't kill random process KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-10 23:41 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-10 23:22 ` OOM Killer don't works at all if the system have >gigabytes memory (was Re: [PATCH] mm: check zone->all_unreclaimable in all_unreclaimable()) David Rientjes
2011-05-11 2:30 ` CAI Qian
2011-05-11 20:34 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-12 0:13 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-12 19:38 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-13 4:16 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-13 11:04 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-16 20:42 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-13 6:53 ` CAI Qian
2011-05-16 20:46 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1491537913.283996.1304930866703.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com \
--to=caiqian@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avagin@gmail.com \
--cc=avagin@openvz.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).