linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>, Moni Shoua <monis@mellanox.com>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>,
	Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@gmail.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] add the option of fortified string.h functions
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 17:32:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1496439121.13303.1.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170602140743.274b9babba6118bfd12c7a26@linux-foundation.org>

On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 14:07 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 26 May 2017 05:54:04 -0400 Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> 
> > This adds support for compiling with a rough equivalent to the glibc
> > _FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 feature, providing compile-time and runtime buffer
> > overflow checks for string.h functions when the compiler determines
> > the
> > size of the source or destination buffer at compile-time. Unlike
> > glibc,
> > it covers buffer reads in addition to writes.
> 
> Did we find a bug in drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c?
> 
> i386 allmodconfig:
> 
> In file included from ./include/linux/bitmap.h:8:0,
>                  from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:11,
>                  from ./include/linux/mm_types_task.h:13,
>                  from ./include/linux/mm_types.h:4,
>                  from ./include/linux/kmemcheck.h:4,
>                  from ./include/linux/skbuff.h:18,
>                  from drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c:34:
> In function 'memcpy',
>     inlined from 'send_atomic_ack.constprop' at
> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c:998:2,
>     inlined from 'acknowledge' at
> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c:1026:3,
>     inlined from 'rxe_responder' at
> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c:1286:10:
> ./include/linux/string.h:309:4: error: call to '__read_overflow2'
> declared with attribute error: detected read beyond size of object
> passed as 2nd parameter
>     __read_overflow2();
> 
> 
> If so, can you please interpret this for the infiniband developers?

It copies sizeof(skb->cb) bytes with memcpy which is 48 bytes since cb
is a 48 byte char array in `struct sk_buff`. The source buffer is a
`struct rxe_pkt_info`:

struct rxe_pkt_info {
	struct rxe_dev		*rxe;		/* device that owns packet */
	struct rxe_qp		*qp;		/* qp that owns packet */
	struct rxe_send_wqe	*wqe;		/* send wqe */
	u8			*hdr;		/* points to bth */
	u32			mask;		/* useful info about pkt */
	u32			psn;		/* bth psn of packet */
	u16			pkey_index;	/* partition of pkt */
	u16			paylen;		/* length of bth - icrc */
	u8			port_num;	/* port pkt received on */
	u8			opcode;		/* bth opcode of packet */
	u8			offset;		/* bth offset from pkt->hdr */
};

That looks like 32 bytes (1 byte of padding) on 32-bit and 48 bytes on
64-bit (1 byte of padding), so on 32-bit there's a read overflow of 16
bytes from the stack here.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-02 21:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-26  9:54 [PATCH v4] add the option of fortified string.h functions Daniel Micay
2017-06-02 21:07 ` Andrew Morton
2017-06-02 21:32   ` Daniel Micay [this message]
2017-06-03  5:07     ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1496439121.13303.1.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=danielmicay@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dja@axtens.net \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=hal.rosenstock@gmail.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=monis@mellanox.com \
    --cc=sean.hefty@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).